Billion secs = 32 yrs, Trillion secs = 32,000 yrs

Visit to learn more!

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Prof. Richard Lindzen Weighs In On Climate Change, Risking Prison Term? | Western Free Press

OK, so for 50 years they've been trying and failing to convince the public that man is destroying the planet through global warming/climate change but time is on their side. They won't stop because it's key to their land stealing scheme called UN Agenda 21 which is a lynchpin of their plans for a one world government. As the old saying goes, if you tell a lie long enough...

Prof. Richard Lindzen Weighs In On Climate Change, Risking Prison Term? | Western Free Press

 | April 18 2016
David Leeper
Lindzen NyeWhom should one consult on the science behind climate-change alarmism? Maybe BillBill Nye, “The Science Guy”? Or maybe RichardRichard Lindzen, MIT Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Physics?
If you’re a politician, activist, or reporter (Group 3 as Lindzen calls it in the video), you should probably stick with Bill Nye.
Granted, Nye’s credentials aren’t nearly as impressive as Lindzen’s, and he often behaves like a rodeo clown, but he buys in to the climate change hysteria that is so beloved by politicians who seek wealth and power, activists who need a grand cause to champion, and those media that thrive on doomsday headlines.
In fact, Nye says he’s comfortable with jail terms for those who dare to challenge climate change “science”!
On the other hand, if you haven’t bought in to climate-change hysteria just yet, you may want to hear first from Lindzen in the Prager University 5-minute video below. After that, if you still want to jump on the climate-change bandwagon, thereby avoiding a Bill-Nye-recommended jail sentence, at least you’ll have done it with your eyes open.
In one sense, I suppose Lindzen has been a fool. He could have sacrificed his integrity long ago by falsifying data, perverting its interpretation, and/or outright lying in print in exchange for massive federal grants to “prove” the mythical “scientific consensus” about anthropogenic climate change (aka global warming).
Sadly, Lindzen has allowed himself to be swayed by hard data, objective analysis, and thescientific method. Apparently he is among those who insist that:
If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. And if it’s science, it isn’t consensus. 
Too bad for Prof. Lindzen. He could end up in prison next to the other ‘deniers’.
How about you? See Video here

Okay, okay, so this article is kind of sarcastic and silly. Imagine comparing a science clown like Bill Nye to a top-tier atmospheric physicist like Richard Lindzen. No one should take this seriously, right?
See also this link or simply Google “climate change deniers Loretta Lynch” and see what comes up.
This is all deadly serious. The US Attorney General is giving serious consideration to prosecuting real scientists who dare to challenge the “settled science” of climate change. What’s next? Ordinary citizens who ask legitimate questions about it?
If American leftists/neo-Marxists/progressives/statists/Stalinists/Maoists/whatever-ists can criminalize scientific inquiry, what do you think they’ll do with political speech they don’t like?
How about:
  • Prosecuting Common Core critics for endangering the welfare of minors
  • Prosecuting Obamacare critics for creating a public health hazard
  • Prosecuting open border critics for hate speech
  • And so on, and so on

No comments:

Post a Comment