Billion secs = 32 yrs, Trillion secs = 32,000 yrs

Visit to learn more!

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Memory Delete Key: I’m SO glad people in power are good otherwise this could be bad!!!

Scientist are taking us into uncharted territory, places we’ve never been and probably should never go!

This should really come in handy in the new world order!

How Scientists Are Learning To Shape Our Memory

The next treatment for trauma could be spotless minds.

By Virginia Hughes Posted 11.25.2013 at 10:13 am

BrainTubeDown Memory Lane

The human brain has roughly 100 billion neurons and can store about 2.5 petabytes of information. But where you put your keys last night? The answer is always suspiciously unavailable.

Sam Kaplan

Roadside bombs, childhood abuse, car accidents—they form memories that can shape (and damage) us for a lifetime. Now, a handful of studies have shown that we’re on the verge of erasing and even rewriting memories. The hope is that this research will lead to medical treatments, especially for addiction and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Researchers have known for decades that memories are unreliable. They’re particularly adjustable when actively recalled because at that point they’re pulled out of a stable molecular state. Last spring, scientists published a study performed at the University of Washington in which adult volunteers completed a survey about their eating and drinking habits before age 16. A week later, they were given personalized analyses of their answers that stated—falsely—that they had gotten sick from rum or vodka as a teen. One in five not only didn’t notice the lie, but also recalled false memories about it and rated that beverage as less desirable than they had before. Studies like these point to possible treatments for mental health problems. Both PTSD and addiction disorders hinge on memories that can trigger problematic behaviors, such as crippling fear caused by loud noises or cravings brought about by the sight of drug paraphernalia.

Studies have found chemical compounds that can be used to subdue or even delete memories.Several studies have found chemical compounds that can be used to subdue or even delete memories in mice (and maybe someday in people). In June, a report led by an Emory University researcher showed that SR-8993, a drug that acts on the brain’s opioid receptors, can prevent a fear memory from forming. Researchers strapped mice to a wooden board for two hours—a stressful experience that later gave them a heightened sense of fear similar to PTSD. But mice given SR-8993 before or after the stressful incident were less likely to end up this way. Another study identified a drug, Latrunculin A, that can erase memories days later. The researchers trained rodents to consume methamphetamine in an environment with distinctive visual, tactile, and scent cues such as black walls, gridded floors, and the scent of vanilla or peppermint. Rodents that were injected with Latrunculin A two days later didn’t seek out meth when returned to that environment, but others did. Latrunculin A is known to mess up scaffolding that supports connections between neurons. Considering how broadly these two drugs affect the brain, there’s a possibility of serious side effects.

To make more targeted treatments, researchers will ultimately need to understand how the brain’s neurons encode each memory. Last year, Susumu Tonegawa at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology reported that individual memories in mice leave telltale molecular signatures in the brain’s hippocampus region. In July, his group caused mice to falsely associate an old memory with a new context—essentially creating a false memory. First, they genetically engineered a mouse so that when its hippocampal cells were activated, they would be tagged with a protein that the researchers could switch on later. Then, they put the mouse in an unfamiliar cage. The next day, they moved it to a strikingly different cage (smelly with black walls). Then, at precisely the same time, they gave it an uncomfortable shock and switched on the tagging protein to briefly activate cells that had been active in the old cage. When they put the mouse back in the old cage, it froze as if afraid—as if it had a false memory of being shocked there.

The idea of scientists manipulating memory does, naturally, sound a bit creepy. But it also points to some possible good: treatment for millions of people tormented by real memories. And that’s something worth remembering. 

This article originally appeared in the December 2013 issue of Popular Science.

Monday, November 25, 2013

One mystery of ‘mystery religion’ revealed: Why do the Illuminati telegraph their evil deeds?

I’ve seen tons of examples of tragic events appearing in comic books, movies, TV programs, even on our paper money, weeks, months, sometimes even years before they happened. I wondered if it was to signal other insiders, or if it was a form of narcissistic braggadocio, or what. Eureka, I think I’ve found out!

The excerpt from the following article from Cutting Edge’s website provides a very plausible explanation!


Now, let us get back to our question of the hour: why do the Illuminist leaders of this day seem obsessed with telling the people ahead of time what they are planning to do to them?

A Cutting Edge subscriber from South Africa wrote me a couple of days ago to tell me of something he had discovered about the Kabbala from researching this system on his computer; in researching the Kabbala, he discovered an email link to the originator of the site. This subscriber was curious as to why the Jewish Kabbalists who had placed a 'Pulsa Dinura' curse (killing curse) on Sharon went public with their evil ceremony. Listen to what this subscriber discovered.

"I rushed into the full article about that famous kabbalist curse on Ariel Sharon, specially the interview of that rabbi that conducted the ritual ... I have been asking myself for months WHY on earth do the Illuminati always present (through occult masking) all their upcoming plans into medias, films, or music? What is the reason of their support to those hard-rock, pop musicians?"

When this subscriber asked this Kabbalist via email why the Jewish Kabbalists went public with their 'Pulsa Dinura' curse (killing curse) on Sharon, he received a chilling reply: ""the cursed person needs to know, for the curse to be effective".


Did you catch the horrific meaning of this statement? According to Kabbalistic rituals, one has to tell his cursed victim that they are cursed! Therefore, when they die even after knowing what is about to happen to them, the supreme, supernatural power of the occult is revealed and glorified to the entire world. Satanists of all stripes love to glory in their power -- they love to tell their victim what is about to happen to them, and then see that victim unable -- totally powerless -- to prevent their demise.

Now, you know why the Illuminati "telegraphs their punches" so consistently -- from FEMA's infamous "Three Threats", to the movie "Oil Storm" which preceded Hurricane Katrina to this latest monstrosity, ""It Could Happen Tomorrow", from the Weather Channel. The Kabbalist Elite are putting the entire world on notice as to what is planned to happen to them. Once the victims are killed, or are forced from their homes and are stripped of their comfortable lifestyle, the supernatural power of the Kabbalist Illuminati is glorified.

They told you what they are about to do to you, and you did not have the power to stop them! Satan is glorified in all his pride and arrogance. Their global leadership cares not that the public may know what is coming, because they know that no one has the power to can prevent the event from occurring! Whenever this global Elite can demonstrate their overwhelming power, they will do so.

With this kind of hellish prideful arrogance on display, is it any wonder all the prophetic signs the Bible gives to alert us that the End of the Age is here, are happening all around us -- in your Daily News! Mankind is inching its way toward a prophetic climax of the ages.

Friday, November 22, 2013

Chart of DOOM—Great Depression era stock market chart compared to todays

Everyone On Wall Street Is Passing Around This Chart As The US Dollar Has Just Lost Reserve Status – X22Report

(Before It's News) Friday, November 22, 2013 6:43

The story below from Business Insider is an eye-opener and seems to signal another step towards our ‘New World Order’. The market is now on the cusp of a HUGE crash, comparable to the Great Depression. Wall Streeters now know it as shown in the tweet below. How much time do we have? More below tweet including a video report from the X22Report: The Dollar Has Just Lost Reserve Status.

Wall Streeters Are Starting To Pass Around This Chart Showing The Market On The Cusp Of A Big Crash
Dan Greenhaus of BTIG (@danBTIG) includes this chart in his latest nightly email. It shows the current market aligned with the market in the days before the Depression.
What does the chart mean?
Dan has the best take: HERE.

Thursday, November 21, 2013

‘Knockout’; Thanks Obama! Breitbart warned about this before Obama assassinated him!


'Knockout' Assaults Reported in DC...
VIC: Teens need to be 'empowered'...
Congresswoman attacked, mugged near Capitol building...
'I'm from New York City and I have not been mugged like that'...

America from Christ to antichrist

It could easily be argued that America began as a church. What is a church, it’s a community of believers in a geographical location. In the New Testament how did the apostles address the churches? By their geographical location.

Paul addressed the Church at Philippi but not all Philippians were Christians. There was a company of believers within Philippi. America was unique in that regard because all the inhabitants of the colony were Christians.

Who would argue that the Pilgrims' at Plymouth Rock were not a community of Christians?

Now other settlements sprang up from folks fleeing the old world but the lion’s share of those folk were Christians. So if Paul were to write a letter to the Christians in the new world he could have addressed it to the Church at America and that would have encompassed all the settlements because they were all Christian settlements.

The founding documents were written with the view that the new nation would be composed of Christian peoples guided by Christian principles. I would argue that it never entered into the founding father’s thoughts that America would be anything else but a Christian nation. To deny this by arguing that one or two of the founders was a Universalist or an atheist is frivolous to the extreme.

How did we get from there to here? The following was not a warning about the world but about the Church, the community of believers!

Acts Chapter 20

27 For I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God.

28 Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.

29 For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.

30 Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.

Jude Chapter 1

3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.

4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.

6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.

9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.

10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.

11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.

12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;

13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.

14 And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,

15 To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.

16 These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men's persons in admiration because of advantage.

17 But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ;

18 How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.

19 These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit.


The apostles must have been looking down the centuries at the Society of Jesus aka The Jesuits! It is they who have wrought havoc in the world and especially Protestant nations for the last 500 years.

The Town FEMA Turned Down

  • The tide goes out on religious liberty

Nov 25, 2013, Vol. 19, No. 11 • By JONATHAN V. LAST

Ocean Grove, N.J.
When Sandy swept across the Jersey shore in October 2012, the coastal town of Ocean Grove was spared the worst. Sure, half the town’s boardwalk was destroyed and its pier was swept out to sea. And yes, sand, trees, and concrete benches were carried two blocks inland, while entire buildings were picked up and moved across town. But Ocean Grove’s crown jewel, an ornate and beautiful 6,250-seat auditorium, built in 1894, survived. It only had a third of its roof torn off. The auditorium’s foundation was intact and, most important, its 11,561-pipe organ was unscathed by the wind and rain.



So despite everything, the residents of Ocean Grove counted themselves lucky. That is, until they had to deal with the federal government. Ocean Grove has been denied rebuilding funds from FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency. In one sense, this denial is part of the Obama administration’s quiet campaign against religion in the public square. Yet the story of FEMA’s conflict with Ocean Grove is about more than just Barack Obama. It’s the story of modern America’s rebellion against its religious foundations, rendered in miniature.

In the late 1860s, a Methodist preacher named William Osborn assembled a small group of pastors from around Philadelphia to purchase a patch of land at the shore in central New Jersey. On July 31, 1869, they christened their one square mile of paradise “Ocean Grove.” 

At first, it was just a campsite—the preachers and their flocks pitched tents during the summer in order to get away from the bustle of the city. That December they organized a government for the nascent community, setting up the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association of the Methodist Episcopal Church. In the Northeast of the 1860s, this was a commonplace: Camp meeting associations stemming from the Second Great Awakening were formed in Martha’s Vineyard, Willimantic, Conn., Merrick, N.Y., and elsewhere.

Ocean Grove’s camp meeting was particularly successful. In 1870 the New Jersey state legislature granted the Camp Meeting Association a charter, giving them the power to hold and maintain their property, establish infrastructure, and even create a police force—all in the name of setting their land aside for “the perpetual worship of Jesus Christ.” It was, as they say, a different time.

Moving beyond simple campsites, the association set about building a town. They mapped a network of streets and plots of land. They dug wells and eventually ran electric lines. In 1894, the Great Auditorium, a grand Victorian building at the center of town, was erected in just 92 days. Throughout this period, Ocean Grove thrived. Before he was elected president, James Garfield summered there. Later, Ulysses Grant would be a frequent visitor, often popping in to see his sister, who lived in town.

One of the peculiar laws the town established was a prohibition against the presence of horses (and later cars) anywhere on the streets, parked or moving, from sundown on Saturday to sundown on Sunday. This ban was absolute. One Sunday in 1875, President Grant arrived by carriage and, upon reaching the gates at the town limits, tethered his horses and walked the remaining half mile to his sister’s house. (Grant was so fond of Ocean Grove that his final public appearance took place at the Great Auditorium, during a reunion of Civil War Army chaplains. As Wayne Bell recounts in his history of the town, Grant was introduced to speak by one Dr. A. J. Palmer, who concluded his remarks by declaring that “no combination of Wall Street sharpers shall tarnish the luster of my old commander’s fame for me.” Bell reports, “Grant was too overcome with emotion to acknowledge the thunderous ovation and retired without a word.”)

In 1879, the state created a new township, called Neptune, and placed Ocean Grove within its boundaries. But while Ocean Grove paid some taxes to Neptune, they continued to provide their own city services and retained independent authority over local laws.

Yet eventually, Ocean Grove was caught in the church-state tensions that were building between elected officials and the judiciary. In 1920, the state legislature incorporated Ocean Grove as a fully independent borough. But a year later, the state court of appeals held that this was unconstitutional because of Ocean Grove’s religiously based ordinances. The municipality was dissolved, and Ocean Grove reverted to being a semi-autonomous part of Neptune township, with the Camp Meeting Association still in charge of governance.

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Climate change (though debunked) hysteria will not go away, it’s the lynchpin of the NWO plan!

No matter how solidly debunked, no matter how many scientist disagree, no matter how ludicrous the claims, no matter how firmly common sense disputes the claims, the ones behind the new world order will not retreat from climate change mania.

Climate change is the foundation of UN Agenda 21 which intends to put all humans in cages so the wildlife can roam the ranges.

There is also soooo much money in it and even more when they succeed in imposing carbon taxes.

And then there’s the whole religious aspect. It is a religion to many and they are more ardent in their faith than most Christians are in theirs.

If you still believe in 'climate change' read this…

By James Delingpole Environment Last updated: September 3rd, 2013

Put him in the Special Punishment wing. He's earned it

If any business were to submit a prospectus as patently false and deliberately dishonest as the ones used to advance the cause of the global warming industry, its directors would all be in prison by now. (C Jeff Randall)

Does that mean Ed Davey should have followed Chris Huhne into the slammer for his claim to Andrew Neil on BBC Daily Politics the other day that in "a recent analysis of 12,000 climate papers…of the scientists who expressed a view 97 per cent said that climate change was happening and that it was human-made activity."?

Not quite, unfortunately, because nothing Davey has said there is technically untrue. A better candidate for prison, actually, would be whoever tweets under the name @BarackObama. When he Tweeted: "Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous" he was promulgating a demonstrable untruth.

No one has ever doubted that climate changes.

Pretty much everyone – probably more than 97 per cent, even – agrees that there is a degree of anthropogenic input, even it's just the barely measurable contribution of beef cattle farts or the heat produced by cities.

But the dangerous bit? No one has come even close to demonstrating it, there is no reliable evidence for it, and very few scientists – certainly far, far fewer than 97 per cent of them – would ever stake their reputations on such a tendentious claim.

The background to all this – and the "97 per cent of climate scientists say…." meme – is expertly covered in a new paper for the Global Warming Policy Foundation by Andrew Montford.

In a sane world it wouldn't have needed writing. An obscure green political activist called John Cook and a few of his eco-cronies produced a pseudo-scientific paper so riddled with flaws that it ought to have been tossed straight in the bin. Instead, it was bigged up by a compliant mainstream media, a desperate and propaganda-hungry green industry, and by the US President as a vitally significant meta-analysis offering indisputable proof of the scientific "consensus" on "climate change."

Montford concludes:

The consensus as described by the survey is virtually meaningless and tells us nothing about the current state of scientific opinion beyond the trivial observation that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and that human activities have warmed the planet to some unspecified extent. The survey methodology therefore fails to address the key points that are in dispute in the global warming debate."

So how do the bastards go on getting away with it? Jamie Whyte provides a fascinating, erudite and original answer in his new paper for the Institute of Economic Affairs – Quack Policy.

(And for a summary of the lefty reaction so far, see here)

In it, he exposes the "rhetorical bluster" used, inter alia, by the climate alarmist establishment to make their case sound stronger and more trustworthily "scientific" than it really is. He is especially sceptical of those who try to advance their cause with the weasel phrase "evidence-based" policy.

"They are partial in their accounting for costs and benefits; they ignore substitution effects; they pretend that mathematical precision is evidence; they confound risk and uncertainty; and they exaggerate the certainty warranted by the available evidence. Having committed such errors, they obscure them with grandiose irrelevancies about peer-reviewed publication, consensus among scientists and the proclamations of official scientific committees."

For Whyte – an economist as well as a philosopher – the fundamental flaw in the warmist argument is its failure to a use a realistic discount rate.

None of the projected disastrous effects of climate change exists in the present but only in an imaginary future (which may never come to pass: these are only unverifiable computer model "projections", remember). So we ought, when considering our expensive prevention/mitigation policies, factor in the key point that "future generations" are going to be richer than we are and therefore better able to pay for any problems that "climate change" may cause them.

But the alarmists cannot afford to admit this, for to do so would be fatally to weaken their case that the time for action is now and that any delay will be fatal. Their emphasis on their imminence of catastrophe is designed to preclude rational analysis, so as to railroad through policies before more temperate heads notice their flaws.

In order to give this catastrophism more credibility, alarmists are wont to appeal to the authority of the "consensus.' (Which is why, of course, the warmist establishment made such a meal of the Cook paper above).

Again, Whyte finds a fatal flaw in this line of argument:

The climate models that predict AGW have not been tested and they are not mere entailments of well-known physics and chemistry. Why, then, do scientists have such high levels of confidence in them? In other words, if a scientific consensus really does exist, this is what needs to be explained. It cannot explain itself, nor justify itself.

Good point. And I'd love to hear a convincing answer to this from the numerous well-known scientists who have used their prestige or their celebrity or their presumed expertise to help push the great climate change scare. I'm thinking here of everyone from Lord Winston and Sir Paul Nurse to science-background celebs such as Ben Goldacre, Simon Singh and Dara O'Briain, all of whom on various occasions have purported to know that "climate change" is a major problem because apparently there is some kind of "consensus" among scientists.

Whyte elucidates further:

We do not have confidence in the predictions of physics because physicists say we should. Rather, our confidence is founded on the extraordinary success of physics. Physical theory does not merely allow us to anticipate the existence and location of previously unobserved planets or the speed at which little trolleys will travel across school science laboratories; it allows us to build televisions, space ships, microwave ovens and so on. Physicists inherit their credibility from physics, not vice versa. That is why their special credibility is restricted to physicists.

Those who build climate models are scientists. But their branch of science has no success with which to impress us, neither in its predictions nor in its applications. In the absence of such success, their assertions of confidence should carry little weight. Especially when such assertions are predictable even in the absence of proper grounds for confidence.

Whyte is right. The idea that the catastrophic climate change industry can derive any authority from real science is an insult to real science.

By way of further confirmation, you might care to read this superb recent essay from Dr Richard Lindzen, which you can reach via Watts Up With That?. He argues that mainstream climate science is currently akin to Lysenkoism and that its adherents have more in common with religious zealots than scrupulous seekers-after-truth.

“Global climate alarmism has been costly to society, and it has the potential to be vastly more costly. It has also been damaging to science, as scientists adjust both data and even theory to accommodate politically correct positions. How can one escape from the Iron Triangle when it produces flawed science that is immensely influential and is forcing catastrophic public policy?”

Right, snivelling, mendacious, corrupt, shrivelled-and-syphilitic-membered, pseudo-scientific, rabid climate trolls. Let's be hearing your pitiful excuses….


IPCC in denial. “Just-so” excuses use ocean heat to hide their failure.

Al Qaeda in Kentucky: This is what got Brittany Murphy poisoned!

Brittany Murphy stood by Julia Davis, a Homeland Security whistleblower, who reported flaws in border control that allowed terrorists to seep across the porous Mexican Border.

For supporting the whistleblower Brittany was put under government surveillance, she was followed around and her phone was tapped.

Her death was reported as due to pneumonia but her father didn’t buy it especially when her husband died 5 months later the same way. He ordered toxicology tests ad the results suggests she was indeed poisoned!

So the stories below about terrorists sneaking into the US juxtaposed with this story prove that the terrorist were/are intentionally allowed to sneak in…this is treasonous!

Brittany Murphy’s Death — Was She Poisoned By The Government?

Brittany, 32, passed away on December 20, 2009 — her husband, Simon Monjack, 40, died just five months later. And while it was originally due to “natural causes,” Angelo said she was poisoned to death after defending a whistleblower fighting the government.Brittany Murphy Poisoned Government


US May Have Let 'Dozens' of Terrorists Into Country As Refugees...


Al Qaeda in Kentucky?

Jesuits centuries old war to wipe out WASP is almost complete; over 150 curses pronounced at Council of Trent

Whose behind the decline of the West? The Society of Jesus aka The Jesuits aka The Company of Jesus aka The Company aka The Order aka The Pope’s Marines aka God’s Marines aka The Pope’s Assassins…

And now, for the first time (that we know of) the pope is a Jesuit, consider the oath below when you think on that! The Superior General of the Jesuits is also known as the black pope and many say he is he real head of the church. So now both are Jesuits.

In 13 December 1545 the Holy Roman Catholic Church convened what’s known as the Council of Trent. The convention was hijacked by the Society of Jesus aka Jesuits whose sole mission was to counter the Protestant Reformation. By the end of the council over 150 curses ("let him be anathema") were pronounced on the protestant heretics.

They were established as a military order unlike any previous order whose leader was known as the Superior General. They didn’t fight with swords and spears but with infiltration, subterfuge, treason, lies, and assassination.

It’s members empty themselves of all that is them and becomes whatever their superior desires. Never in the history of mankind had men been called upon to be subjected so complete to control by others. The Jesuit was the first true zombie, the first automaton. The Members of the order swear an oath:

The Jesuit Oath of Induction is also recorded in the Congressional Record of the U.S.A. (House Bill 1523, Contested election case of Eugene C. Bonniwell, against Thos. S. Butler, Feb. 15, 1913, pp. 3215-3216) It can also be found in the book entitled, "Subterranean Rome" by Charles Didier translated from the French and published in New York in 1843. Dr.

The article below was taken from the book Subterranean Rome by Charles Didier, translated from the French and published in New York in 1843. Dr. Alberto Rivera escaped from the Jesuit Order in 1967, and he describes his Jesuit oath in exactly the same way as it appears in this book. After reading this, ask yourself the question: Is this REALLY the church of Jesus Christ???

"When a Jesuit of the minor rank is to be elevated to command, he is conducted into the Chapel of the Convent of the Order, where there are only three others present, the principal or Superior standing in front of the altar. On either side stands a monk, one of whom holds a banner of yellow and white, which are the Papal colors, and the other a black banner with a dagger and red cross above a skull and crossbones, with the word INRI, and below them the words IUSTUM, NECAR, REGES, IMPIOUS. The meaning of which is: It is just to exterminate or annihilate impious or heretical Kings, Governments, or Rulers. Upon the floor is a red cross at which the postulant or candidate kneels. The Superior hands him a small black crucifix, which he takes in his left hand and presses to his heart, and the Superior at the same time presents to him a dagger, which he grasps by the blade and holds the point against his heart, the Superior still holding it by the hilt, and thus addresses the postulant:"

Superior speaks:

My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to be a reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant, and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope.

You have been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace. To take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.

You have been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every source; to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of the family circle of Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and universities, in parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to be all things to all men, for the Pope's sake, whose servants we are unto death.

You have received all your instructions heretofore as a novice, a neophyte, and have served as co-adjurer, confessor and priest, but you have not yet been invested with all that is necessary to command in the Army of Loyola in the service of the Pope. You must serve the proper time as the instrument and executioner as directed by your superiors; for none can command here who has not consecrated his labors with the blood of the heretic; for "without the shedding of blood no man can be saved." Therefore, to fit yourself for your work and make your own salvation sure, you will, in addition to your former oath of obedience to your order and allegiance to the Pope, repeat after me---

The Extreme Oath of the Jesuits:

"1, _ now, in the presence of Almighty God, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed Michael the Archangel, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the holy Apostles St. Peter and St. Paul and all the saints and sacred hosts of heaven, and to you, my ghostly father, the Superior General of the Society of Jesus, founded by St. Ignatius Loyola in the Pontificate of Paul the Third, and continued to the present, do by the womb of the virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear, that his holiness the Pope is Christ's Vice-regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by virtue of the keys of binding and loosing, given to his Holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, states, commonwealths and governments, all being illegal without his sacred confirmation and that they may safely be destroyed. Therefore, to the utmost of my power I shall and will defend this doctrine of his Holiness' right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and the now pretended authority and churches of England and Scotland, and branches of the same now established in Ireland and on the Continent of America and elsewhere; and all adherents in regard that they be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome. I do now renounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or state named Protestants or Liberals, or obedience to any of the laws, magistrates or officers.

I do further declare that the doctrine of the churches of England and Scotland, of the Calvinists, Huguenots and others of the name Protestants or Liberals to be damnable and they themselves damned who will not forsake the same.

I do further declare, that I will help, assist, and advise all or any of his Holiness' agents in any place wherever I shall be, in Switzerland, Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, England, Ireland or America, or in any other Kingdom or territory I shall come to, and do my uttermost to extirpate the heretical Protestants or Liberals' doctrines and to destroy all their pretended powers, regal or otherwise.

I do further promise and declare, that notwithstanding I am dispensed with, to assume my religion heretical, for the propaganda of the Mother Church's interest, to keep secret and private all her agents' counsels from time to time, as they may entrust me and not to divulge, directly or indirectly, by word, writing or circumstance whatever; but to execute all that shall be proposed, given in charge or discovered unto me, by you, my ghostly father, or any of this sacred covenant.

I do further promise and declare, that I will have no opinion or will of my own, or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver (perinde ac cadaver), but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the Militia of the Pope and of Jesus Christ.

That I may go to any part of the world withersoever I may be sent, to the frozen regions of the North, the burning sands of the desert of Africa, or the jungles of India, to the centers of civilization of Europe, or to the wild haunts of the barbarous savages of America, without murmuring or repining, and will be submissive in all things whatsoever communicated to me.

I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants' heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.

In confirmation of which, I hereby dedicate my life, my soul and all my corporal powers, and with this dagger which I now receive, I will subscribe my name written in my own blood, in testimony thereof; and should I prove false or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the Militia of the Pope cut off my hands and my feet, and my throat from ear to ear, my belly opened and sulphur burned therein, with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth and my soul be tortured by demons in an eternal hell forever!

All of which, I, _, do swear by the Blessed Trinity and blessed Sacraments, which I am now to receive, to perform and on my part to keep inviolable; and do call all the heavenly and glorious host of heaven to witness the blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist, and witness the same further with my name written and with the point of this dagger dipped in my own blood and sealed in the face of this holy covenant."

(He receives the wafer from the Superior and writes his name with the point of his dagger dipped in his own blood taken from over his heart.)

Superior speaks:

"You will now rise to your feet and I will instruct you in the Catechism necessary to make yourself known to any member of the Society of Jesus belonging to this rank.

In the first place, you, as a Brother Jesuit, will with another mutually make the ordinary sign of the cross as any ordinary Roman Catholic would; then one cross his wrists, the palms of his hands open, and the other in answer crosses his feet, one above the other; the first points with forefinger of the right hand to the center of the palm of the left, the other with the forefinger of the left hand points to the center of the palm of the right; the first then with his right hand makes a circle around his head, touching it; the other then with the forefinger of his left hand touches the left side of his body just below his heart; the first then with his right hand draws it across the throat of the other, and the latter then with a dagger down the stomach and abdomen of the first. The first then says Iustum; and the other answers Necar; the first Reges. The other answers Impious." (The meaning of which has already been explained.) "The first will then present a small piece of paper folded in a peculiar manner, four times, which the other will cut longitudinally and on opening the name Jesu will be found written upon the head and arms of a cross three times. You will then give and receive with him the following questions and answers:

Question —From whither do you come? Answer — The Holy faith.

Q. —Whom do you serve?

A. —The Holy Father at Rome, the Pope, and the Roman Catholic Church Universal throughout the world.

Q. —Who commands you?

A. —The Successor of St. Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus or the Soldiers of Jesus Christ.

Q. —Who received you? A. —A venerable man in white hair.

Q. —How?

A. —With a naked dagger, I kneeling upon the cross beneath the banners of the Pope and of our sacred order.

Q. —Did you take an oath?

A. —I did, to destroy heretics and their governments and rulers, and to spare neither age, sex nor condition. To be as a corpse without any opinion or will of my own, but to implicitly obey my Superiors in all things without hesitation of murmuring.

Q. —Will you do that? A. —I will.

Q. —How do you travel? A. —In the bark of Peter the fisherman.

Q. —Whither do you travel? A. —To the four quarters of the globe.

Q. —For what purpose?

A. —To obey the orders of my general and Superiors and execute the will of the Pope and faithfully fulfill the conditions of my oaths.

Q. —Go ye, then, into all the world and take possession of all lands in the name of the Pope. He who will not accept him as the Vicar of Jesus and his Vice-regent on earth, let him be accursed and exterminated."

Christianity at risk of dying out in a generation, warns Lord Carey

  • Lord Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, warns Christianity "a generation away from extinction" in Britain

Reverend Dr George Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, calls for urgent change to attract youngsters to the church

Lord Carey has warned that Christianity is "a generation away from extinction" in Britain Photo: ANDREW CROWLEY FOR THE TELEGRAPH
By John Bingham, Religious Affairs Editor

Christianity is just a “generation away from extinction” in Britain unless churches make a dramatic breakthrough in attracting young people back to the faith, the former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey has warned.

Clergy are now gripped by a “feeling of defeat”, congregations are worn down by “heaviness” while the public simply greets both with “rolled eyes and a yawn of boredom”, he said.

His comments at a Christian conference came as a stark report laid before the Church of England’s General Synod warned that its position as a “national institution” will be in doubt if numbers in the pews drop much further.

The Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, also underlined the scale of the crisis telling members of the Synod they must “evangelise or fossilise”.

In an impassioned plea for Church to adopt a new missionary stance, he told them that their constant internal debates were like no more than “rearranging furniture when the house is on fire”.

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Duh? Why is there any question as to whether there was more than one shooter?

They accounted for two bullets, one tore through President Kennedy’s body, through Governor Connelly's body and wrist and lodged in pristine condition two inches into his thigh. The other hit President Kennedy in the skull and exploded and blew a portion of his skull and brain out.

The first was a full metal jacket and the second was a obviously hollow point. Did Oswald use two different types of ammo? I  don’t think so. The sizes of the entry wounds were different, according to some accounts I’ve seen, so two different calibers were used, did Oswald use two different calibers? I don’t think so!

It’s preposterous that this was not a major consideration in the investigation and subsequent Warren Comission, make that Omission!

There is no way Oswald operated alone if indeed Oswald acted at all! I don’t think the ‘patsy’ fired a shot.

From the very first time I saw the fatal shot in the Zapruder footage I was sure it was a frontal shot. His head jerked backward and the brain and skull material were blasted onto the back of the car. I’ll never forget seeing Jackie scrambling along the trunk of the car to retrieve the blasted out matter.

They say the reason for that was that the car was moving. It wasn’t moving that fast at that time.  It sped up after the fatal shot. 

Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

  • Confirms testimony of doctors who treated Kennedy
      Published: 10/27/2013 at 1:32 PM

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Warren Commission, in its effort to portray Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin of President John F. Kennedy, had to ignore or otherwise obfuscate abundant medical evidence and testimony that JFK suffered an exit wound in the back of his head.

    A front-entry wound in his body means that more than one shooter had to have been involved, as Oswald’s Texas School Book Depository building was behind JFK’s limo when the shooting began.

    One little known piece of evidence can be found at the end of the famous film footage by Abraham Zapruder, as the presidential limo is about to go under the triple overpass, says WND senior writer Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released “Who Really Killed Kennedy? 50 Years Later: Stunning New Revelations about the JFK Assassination.”

    The remarkable series of frames in the Zapruder film shows a frantic Jackie Kennedy in the back seat propping her husband up to a full sitting position, as if he were alive.

    The sequence, rarely watched or studied, begins to be clearly seen around frame 456.

    Secret details of JFK’s assassination are finally unlocked. Get your autographed copy of “Who Really Killed Kennedy?” by Jerome Corsi now!

    In the instant after the fatal headshot, Jackie Kennedy reacted with the type of hysteria that some unfortunate victims experience who have lost an appendage or part of an appendage. Just as those victims will try to jam the severed appendage back in place, in the film Jackie scrambles onto the trunk of the limo trying to grab some part of JFK’s skull or brain matter.

    Once Jackie gets back in the seat, it appears she desperately tries to put her husband back together again to the point of moving the head flap back in place.

    Zapruder film, frame 456

    By frame 456, JFK can be seen in an upright sitting position, even though he is brain dead from the massive headshot wounds.

    Zapruder film frame 456 enlarged shows more clearly the discoloration in the back of JFK’s head that has been interpreted to represent bloody hair from a massive exit wound.

    “Who Really Killed Kennedy,” released last month as the 50th anniversary of the assassination approaches, is bolstered by recently declassified documents that shed new light on the greatest “who-done-it” mystery of the 20th century. Corsi sorted through tens of thousands of documents, all 26 volumes of the Warren Commission’s report, hundreds of books, several films and countless photographs.

    Jackie blacks out

    In her testimony to the Warren Commission, Jackie Kennedy was asked if she remembered Secret Service Agent Clint Hill, who climbed on the back of the limo to help.

    “I don’t remember anything,” she answered, adding a few questions later that she had no recollection whatsoever of climbing out on the back of the car after the shooting.

    Secret Service Agent Clint Hill wrote a 2012 book, “Mrs. Kennedy and Me,” in which he describes his experience during the JFK assassination.

    “I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

    For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s must have been an exit wound.

    “As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.”

    The importance of the few frames at the end of the Zapruder film is the fleeting view of the back of JFK’s head.

    The hair around the back head wound is a richer brownish-red color, with the discoloration adjacent to the right ear about the size of a grapefruit.

    While the visual evidence of Zapruder frame 456 is not indisputable proof of a rear exit wound to JFK’s head, the discoloration at the back of his head observed in frame 456 is consistent with the description of the head wound made public by the physicians at Parkland Hospital that attended JFK.

    ‘Massive wound at the back of his head’

    Immediately after JFK’s death, the Parkland Hospital medical team went public with their conclusion that the wound they observed in the occipital range of his head near the right ear, a wound most described as being the size of a grapefruit, was an exit wound.

    At the Parkland Hospital press conference held one hour and 15 minutes after JFK had been pronounced dead, Dr. Malcolm Perry, one of the attending physicians in the emergency room, and Dr. Kemp Clark, a neurosurgeon who also attended to JFK in the emergency room, attributed the cause of death to a massive wound at the back of his head.

    The two physicians knew almost nothing about the facts of the assassination and were cautious about making deductions from the medical evidence.

    Clark exhibited caution when he told a reporter that “the head wound could have been either the exit wound from the neck or it could have been a tangential wound, as it was simply a large, gaping loss of tissue.”

    Either way, it’s clear the two doctors considered the gaping hole at the back of JFK’s skull to have been an exit wound and the bullet hole observed in JFK’s neck to have been an entrance wound.

    Dr. Charles Carrico, a surgeon doing his residency at Parkland Hospital at the time, was the first physician to treat JFK in the emergency room. In his testimony to the Warren Commission, Carrico described JFK’s head wound in questioning from assistant counsel Arlen Specter, who later served 30 years in the U.S. Senate:

    Dr. Carrico: [JFK’s head wound] was a 5- by 51-cm defect in the posterior skull, the occipital region. There was an absence of the calvarium or skull in this area, with shredded tissue, brain tissue present and initially considerable slow oozing. Then after we established some circulation there was more profuse bleeding from the wound.

    Mr. Specter: Was any other wound observed on the head in addition to this large opening where the skull was absent?

    Dr. Carrico: No other wound on the head.

    Dr. Robert McClelland, a surgeon on the staff of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, was giving a lecture at Parkland Hospital when JFK was brought into the emergency room.

    Summoned to the emergency room, McClelland arrived after the tracheotomy had been given. Putting on surgical gloves, McClelland also observed a massive wound to the back of JFK’s head.

    He testified to the Warren Commission that through that wound, “you could actually look down into the skull cavity itself and see that possibly a third or so, at least, of the brain tissue, posterior cerebral tissue and some of the cerebellar tissue had been blasted out.”

    McClelland’s testimony shows that the emergency room doctors were more concerned with trying to save the president’s life than trying to figure out how he had been shot.

    “The initial impression that we had was that perhaps the wound in the neck, the anterior part of the neck, was an entrance wound and that it had perhaps taken a trajectory off the anterior vertebral body and again into the skull, exiting out the back, to produce the massive injury in the head,” he testified.

    “However, this required some straining of the imagination to imagine that this would happen, and it was much easier to explain the apparent trajectory by means of two bullets.”

    Dr. Crenshaw’s account

    Charles A. Crenshaw, M.D., one of the physicians attending JFK at Parkland has continued to insist the wound to JFK’s head was a front-entry wound – a story Crenshaw told in his book “JFK: Conspiracy of Silence” that was published in 1992 and republished this year without change under the title, “JFK Has Been Shot: A Parkland Hospital Surgeon Speaks Out.”

    Crenshaw wrote:

    I walked to the President’s head to get a closer look. His entire right cerebral hemisphere appeared to be gone. It looked like a crater – an empty cavity. All I could see there was mangled, bloody tissue. From the damage I saw, there was no doubt in my mind that the bullet had entered his head through the front, and as it surgically passed through his cranium, the missile obliterated part of the temporal and all the parietal and occipital lobes before it lacerated the cerebellum. The wound resembled a deep furrow in a freshly plowed field. Several years later when I viewed slow-motion films of the bullet striking the President, the physics of the head being thrown back provided final and complete confirmation of a frontal entry by the bullet to the cranium.

    The basic logic of gunshot wounds apply: entrance wounds tend to be small, bullet-size holes, as the Parkland Hospital emergency room physicians observed in JFK’s neck wound before the incision was made for the tracheotomy. Exit wounds tend to be larger, such as the grapefruit-sized, gaping wounds the Parkland Hospital emergency room physicians observed in the back of JFK’s head.

    Crenshaw’s testimony was so damaging to the Warren Commission’s conclusion that those who maintain Oswald was the lone assassin have attacked him. The American Medical Association claimed in a press conference held in New York City on May 19, 1992, that Crenshaw was not n Parkland Hospital’s Trauma Room One at the time emergency treatment was provided to President Kennedy.

    Crenshaw sued the AMA, winning in 1994 an out-of-court monetary settlement that ended the case, substantiating Crenshaw’s claim.

    The Warren Commission did not call Crenshaw to testify.

    Note: Media wishing to interview Jerome Corsi, please contact us here.

    Secret details of Kennedy’s assassination are finally unlocked. Get your autographed copy of “Who Really Killed Kennedy?” by Jerome Corsi now!


    Friday, November 15, 2013

    Secret Service purge under way?

    Along with 200 or so top military brass being booted out of the service in what many see as a purge we may be seeing the same occurring in the Secret Service.

    Is Obama surrounding himself with agents created in his own image and likeness? Is he creating his own SS?

    Secret Service officials reportedly accused of misconduct in 17 countries


    April 14, 2012: U.S. secret service agents walk around the Convention Center in Cartagena, Colombia, prior to the Summit of the Americas.AP

    Secret Service officials are being accused of recently engaging in sexual misconduct and other indiscretions in a total of 17 countries, according to a report Friday in The Washington Post.

    The paper reported that the claims were made by whistleblowers to a Senate committee. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., top Republican on that Homeland Security subcommittee, told the Post that the accounts contradict claims made by Secret Service leaders that the agency does not allow such behavior.

    The shocking allegations follow the April 2012 incident where a number of agents were caught drinking and seeing prostitutes while on assignment in Colombia.

    The Post also reported this week that two supervisors were removed from President Obama’s detail and are under investigation for alleged sexual misconduct. The paper reported that two senior supervisors at the agency, Ignacio Zamora, Jr., and Timothy Barraclough, were found to have sent sexually suggestive emails to a female subordinate.

    N-word: Barkley: ‘What I Do With My Black Friends Is Not Up To White America To Dictate’

    So why does black America get to dictate what I do with my white friends?

    It’s obvious that the n-word is an essential part of blacks communicating with one another and one of the favorite words of black comedians and musicians (I use that word loosely); I don’t know if they could perform if the word was stricken from their vocabulary.

    The confusing part is why they are so offended if a white person uses the word among their friends. Why do they get to dictate what words whites use among their friends?

    I remember when ‘Dog the Bounty Hunter’ had to cry and apologize and beg repeatedly after a tape was release of him using the n-word. And he still lost his TV show for quite a while.

    “Sticks and stones may brake my bones but words can never hurt me.” That’s something I was taught when I was a child, why doesn’t it work anymore?

    I don’t care if Barkley uses the word, or black comedians and musicians use the word. I don’t even care if Dog or Paula Dean uses the word, but that’s just me…

    Barkley: ‘What I Do With My Black Friends Is Not Up To White America To Dictate’

    Thursday, November 14, 2013

    Prosecutor: For years, “the mafia has laundered money and made investments with the complicity of the church

    Prosecutor warns of a mafia threat against Pope Francis

    By Eric J. Lyman | Religion News Service, Published: November 13

    ROME — Pope Francis could be at risk from the ‘Ndrangheta organized crime organization, according to a leading anti-mob prosecutor who has himself been the target of threats from the mafia.


    Nicola Gratteri, 55, a state prosecutor in the southern Italian region of Calabria, where the ‘Ndrangheta is most active, said the pope’s effort to reform the church is making the ‘Ndrangheta “very nervous.”

    The organization is considered by experts in Italy to be the most dangerous, most unified and most difficult to penetrate mafia-type organization in the country.

    “I cannot say if the organization is in a position to do something like this, but they are dangerous and it is worth reflecting on,” Gratteri warned. “If the godfathers can find a way to stop him, they will seriously consider it.

    “Those who have up until now profited from the influence and wealth drawn from the church are getting very nervous,” he added. “For many years, the mafia has laundered money and made investments with the complicity of the church. But now the pope is dismantling the poles of economic power in the Vatican, and that is dangerous.”

    Gratteri noted that in southern Italy organized crime figures have strong and high-profile relationships with local church leaders, who help give the crime figures legitimacy.

    He also said most Italian mobsters are practicing Catholics, despite their violent activities.

    “A gunman from the ‘Ndrangheta will pray and kiss his rosary before shooting someone,” said Gratteri, who has been under police protection against the mob since the 1980s.

    More from Barack Obama childhood friend Mia Pope

    More Shocking Obama Revelations From Mia Pope & Jeff Rense

    (Before It's News)  Thursday, November 14, 2013 7:40

    Jeff Rense is joined by Barack Obama childhood friend Mia Pope for a follow-up conversation to an earlier viral story/video about the ‘real’ Barack Obama. From the mysterious way that Barack Obama was admitted to Punahou High School in Hawaii to Barack Obama’s bi-sexual tendencies, this interview is one that Barack Obama surely doesn’t want to get out to the entire world.



    Obamacare Noose: NC Senator runs way from Obamacare she rammed down out throats

    Attn: North Carolinians, Kay Hagan has been in the news lately trying to separate herself from the nightmare called Obamacare. She is one of the top 10 democrats that owe us an apology for her support of it.

    She could have stopped it from becoming a reality, she didn’t. Instead she championed it. Now she’s trying to make us forget that. We won’t forget!

    SEN. KAY HAGAN (D-NC): “We need to support the private insurance industry so that people who have insurance they're happy with can keep it while also providing a backstop option for people without access to affordable coverage.” (“Republicans Vent As Other Compromise Plans Get Aired,” National Journal’s Congress Daily, 6/18/09)

    160,000 residents of North Carolina has lost their health coverage. Sen. Hagan has been most aggressive in trying to separate herself from ObamaCare. No wonder, since even a Democrat poll has found her now in a statistical tie with any of her possible Republican challengers. In September,  Hagan held a 12-17 point lead. She is up for reelection next year and should apologize.

    Wednesday, November 13, 2013

    Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Fukushima? World's Most Perilous Nuclear Operation Set To Begin

    What’s causing the recent death of thousands of sea turtles and the ‘wasting’ disease that’s killing the starfish on the west coast? It may very well be radiation from Fukushima. Could the Pacific ocean be contaminated from Japan to the American continent. If so, we may be on the cusp of unparalleled disaster.

    With the world’s largest garbage pile headed for the USA’s west coast, the rubble from Japan, one wonders if the radiation has also spread from Japan to America. I’ve seen several confirmed reports of contaminated water leaks into the ocean from the damaged nuclear facility. There are also fears that there is under ground seepage, so no one is sure how much contaminated water has leaked from the reactors into the ocean water.

    Add to that the story below and we are in a very perilous time!   

    'Trust Us': World's Most Perilous Nuclear Operation Set To Begin

    With effort to remove fuel rods from Fukushima's Reactor 4 expected any day, few trust TEPCO's assurances
    - Jon Queally, staff writer

    Nuclear fuel rods are seen in the spent fuel pool inside the No.4 reactor building at Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO)'s tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Fukushima prefecture. (Credit: REUTERS/Tomohiro Ohsumi)"No one here trusts Tokyo Electric."

    That's how Reuters, quoting former local resident Ichiro Kazawa, concludes their latest reporting on the pending and enormously dangerous operation scheduled to begin inside the crippled Reactor 4 building at the Fukushima nuclear plant.

    "Full release from the Unit-4 spent fuel pool, without any containment or control, could cause by far the most serious radiological disaster to date."

    As Common Dreams has previously reported, the operation to remove the fuel rods from Reactor 4 has nuclear experts sounding every alarm bell they can find in order to draw attention to the potentially devastating results if something goes wrong with the effort.

    And as Kazawa's comments make clear, very few find trust in the promises coming from the plant's owner, the Tokyo Electric Company (or TEPCO).

    According to Reuters:

    The hazardous removal operation has been likened by Arnie Gundersen, a veteran U.S. nuclear engineer and director of Fairewinds Energy Education, to trying to pull cigarettes from a crushed pack.

    When the time comes, extracting spent fuel from the plant's other reactors, where radiation levels are much higher because of core meltdowns, will be even more challenging. Reactors No. 1 and No. 3 sustained heavier damage than No. 4 as a result of the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami that knocked out power and cooling at the Fukushima station, triggering three meltdowns that sent a plume of radiation into the air and nearby Pacific Ocean.

    The urgency to clear Reactor No. 4 of the fuel assemblies is because of the risk in having spent fuel stored at such a height - some 18 meters above ground level - in a building that has buckled and tilted and could collapse if another quake strikes.

    Also, if the pool housing the fuel assemblies is punctured and the water drains away, there could be a fire that releases more radiation than during the 2011 disaster, threatening Tokyo, some 200 kms (125 miles) to the south.

    "Full release from the Unit-4 spent fuel pool, without any containment or control, could cause by far the most serious radiological disaster to date," independent consultants Mycle Schneider and Antony Froggatt wrote in a recent World Nuclear Industry Status Report.

    The exact start date of the operation is being kept secret from the public, says TEPCO, because of "security" concerns.

    However, according to longtime anti-nuclear activist Harvey Wasserman, the real concern should be not knowing what's going on at Reactor 4 while TEPCO and nuclear industry apologists assure people they have things "under control." Pushing back, Wasserman recently called for an end to the secrecy surrounding the operation.

    Nothing short of a full-on global presence will do.  The bring-down of the fuel rods from Unit Four is a terrifying unknown.  There’s no precedent for an operation of this scope, precision or potential fallout.  

    At very least it demands fullest possible attention from all the world’s best scientists and engineers.  The global media must power through the Abe Administration’s crack-down on the flow of information.  And we must all direct our full awareness to what is about to happen at Fukushima.

    Unfortunately, it’s no exaggeration to say that our survival may depend on it.

    Republican Rockefeller and Democrat George Soros confirm sameness of the two parties!

    Two of the richest men in the world have almost unlimited influence in their respective parties, which are supposed to be diametrically opposed to one another, share the same world view of ‘global governance’ i. e., a new world order. From their ideals you would think they were in the same party. Wise up, they are!

    They, the ruling elite, the powers that be, the shadow government, have been creating the illusion that we are the land of the free when in fact we are not. The illusion is that we actually have a choice when we go the the voting booth. We don’t because they control both parties! It doesn't matter which party is in power they set the agenda.

    These two are joined at the hips in political ideology yet are in supposedly opposing parties. 

    From: Facebook Notes by Alan Scholl

    DavidRockefellerGlobalists1.  On page 405 of his book Memoirs, published in 2002, Random House Publishers, (you can buy this on today...), in a chapter appropriately entitled "Proud Internationalist," monopolist billionaire David Rockefeller, supreme traitor to American ideals of liberty and free enterprise, and national sovereignty, says, quote:
    "For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
    "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. ... It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." -David Rockefeller
    Excuse me, but that's a pair of confessions that would hold up in court. I have purchased a used copy of David Rockefellers autobiography, Memoirs, to verify these quotes. Sure enough, there they are on page 405 of Rockefellers "Memoirs"

    SorosPuppet12. George Soros, possibly the richest man on earth, has proven from age 14 that he has no morals at all, and seeks only power and self-preservation/promotion.  He is a world government socialist, a Marxist who, like Rockefeller, believes in monopoly, not freedom, not free enterprise.  Here is his own voice/commentary on his work with the Nazi's to round up fellow Jews and confiscate their property.  He is likely the biggest contributor to Obama's campaigns and programs.


    Here are his own words in video / audio about his Nazi "experiences" and the joy they brought him:
    Still a doubter?  Here is the entire transcript from the 60 Minutes interview, courtesy of Snopes, in case you worry about "verification" :
    KROFT: (Voiceover) To understand the complexities and contradictions in his personality, you have to go back to the very beginning: to Budapest, where George Soros was born 68 years ago to parents who were wealthy, well-educated and Jewish.
    When the Nazis occupied Budapest in 1944, George Soros' father was a successful lawyer. He lived on an island in the Danube and liked to commute to work in a rowboat. But knowing there were problems ahead for the Jews, he decided to split his family up. He bought them forged papers and he bribed a government official to take 14-year-old George Soros in and swear that he was his Christian godson. But survival carried a heavy price tag. While hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews were being shipped off to the death camps, George Soros accompanied his phony godfather on his appointed rounds, confiscating property from the Jews.
    (Vintage footage of Jews walking in line; man dragging little boy in line)
    KROFT: (Voiceover) These are pictures from 1944 of what happened to George Soros' friends and neighbors.
    (Vintage footage of women and men with bags over their shoulders walking; crowd by a train)
    KROFT: (Voiceover) You're a Hungarian Jew...
    Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Mm-hmm.
    KROFT: (Voiceover) ...who escaped the Holocaust...
    (Vintage footage of women walking by train)
    Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Mm-hmm.
    (Vintage footage of people getting on train)
    KROFT: (Voiceover) ... by -- by posing as a Christian.
    Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Right.
    (Vintage footage of women helping each other get on train; train door closing with people in boxcar)
    KROFT: (Voiceover) And you watched lots of people get shipped off to the death camps.
    Mr. SOROS: Right. I was 14 years old. And I would say that that's when my character was made.
    KROFT: In what way?
    Mr. SOROS: That one should think ahead. One should understand and -- and anticipate events and when -- when one is threatened. It was a tremendous threat of evil. I mean, it was a -- a very personal experience of evil.
    KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.
    Mr. SOROS: Yes. Yes.
    KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.
    Mr. SOROS: Yes. That's right. Yes.
    KROFT: I mean, that's -- that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?
    Mr. SOROS: Not -- not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don't -- you don't see the connection. But it was -- it created no -- no problem at all.
    KROFT: No feeling of guilt?
    Mr. SOROS: No.
    KROFT: For example that, 'I'm Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.' None of that?
    Mr. SOROS: Well, of course I c -- I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn't be there, because that was -- well, actually, in a funny way, it's just like in markets -- that if I weren't there -- of course, I wasn't doing it, but somebody else would -- would -- would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the -- whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the -- I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt."

    Reeling yet?

    So the most powerful and largest contributor to the Republican “mainstream” is a UN-promoting, internationalist, by his own admission, whose cabal used the media to dupe us all and has publicly thanked them.

    And the largest most powerful Democratic / Obama supporter is a former Nazi collaborator, and international socialist... i.e., a Marxist.

    Former Fed official: QE the greatest backdoor Wall Street bailout of all time

    This partnership of government and ‘big business’ is sinister; it’s diabolical. It hides the weakness of the economy by artificially propping up the stock market while filling the pockets of stock holders, who are mostly the rich.

    All the while it is doing further damage to an already weak economy and the longer this goes on the worse the correction will be.

    The artificial influx of money into the economy is equivalent to stealing because the value of money is diminished with every QE installment making the dollar worth less and less and less and less…

    But that’s ok with the rich in the stock market, they’ll just sell off their stocks before the collapse. I just heard today that Warren Buffett and George Soros have drastically reduced their holdings in the stock market.    

    Ex-Fed official: 'I'm sorry for QE'

    By: Bruno J. Navarro | Online Producer

    Play Video

    Big problems with QE: Former Fed official

    There's a real question as to whether the benefits of monetary easing were worth the cost, former Federal Reserve official Andrew Huzar says.

    There's a real question as to whether the massive bond-buying program known as quantitative easing was worth the cost, former Federal Reserve official Andrew Huszar said Tuesday.

    "My argument is not that QE was not at all useful," he said on CNBC's "Fast Money."

    "I believe that at the time, it was just one more tool that the Fed introduced to try to help the economy," he said. "My point, ultimately, is the idea that very quickly into QE, it started becoming obvious that it wasn't working in the way that it was supposed to."

    Huszar, a senior fellow at Rutgers Business School and a former managing director at Morgan Stanley, noted a few of the program's unintended effects.

    "I think the real issue is that the Fed has expanded its tool kit so dramatically, and really there are some real questions as to how potentially it unwinds, when it unwinds," he said. "We saw this past summer there was this announcement of potentially a taper and the markets actually tanked, and after that the Fed backpedaled. What's going to happen if we go on for months, years longer?"

    Huszar apologized for his role in QE in a Wall Street Journal op-ed published Monday.

    (Read more: O'Shaughnessy: Crisis in long bonds is imminent)

    "I can only say: I'm sorry, America," he wrote. "The central bank continues to spin QE as a tool for helping Main Street. But I've come to recognize the program for what it really is: the greatest backdoor Wall Street bailout of all time."

    Full story>

    Thursday, November 7, 2013

    (VIDEO & AUDIO): Barry’s High School Classmate Reveals What He’s Been Hiding!

    Bombshell! Barack Obama High School Classmate Reveals That He Was A Well Known Homosexual

    (Before It's News)  Wednesday, November 6, 2013 11:44

    The truth finally comes out

    It took awhile, but now childhood friends of president Barack Obama are now coming forward to reveal a past that included massive cocaine use, rampant homosexuality and uncontrollable lying. At the very least, the events related to Obamacare in the past 2 weeks show beyond question is affinity for relentless, pathological lying.

    High school classmate and childhood friend, Maria Pope, has given an interview where she blows the lid of of Barry Soetoro’s wicked past. She reveals that it was open for all to see back then that he spent most of his time with the gay community, and engaging in homosexual acts with rich Hawiian businessmen for drugs and money. Miss Pope said that his use of cocaine and crack were common knowledge. Perhaps now you see why he spent so much money to seal and cover up his records from his school days. But even all that money and secrecy has not prevented the truth from coming out.

    All of Obama’s childhood friends knew that he was born and raised in Indonesia, it was never a question. Even throughout his murky college years, everyone he came in contact with knew he was born in Indonesia.

    The above photograph of Barry Soetoro – a.k.a Barack Hussein Obama – show how he might have looked in his high school days. He was well-known is his youth to dress in womens clothing as illustrated above. In this photo, Miss Pope said he was emulating one of his heros, the transsexual character from the cult movie “Rocky Horror Picture Show“, which she says he saw quite often. We make no claims of authenticity for the photograph, but in deciding whether or not to accept Miss Pope’s testimony, let us breifly remind you of the following news items from the past year:

    America, this is your president. Why do you think he has been so pro-homosexual in his laws and policies? He is simply seeking to advance his own kind.

    If you love America, you must share this story and video with everyone you know on every social outlet you have. Let’s let the whole world see exactly who and what is occupying the White House.

    We're all children in Big Mother's global ‘communitarian’ family

    The EU is the incubator, the model, America is following suit…

    Here's the part that our politicians and the "experts" never tell us about communitarianism: it's also the law of the European Union. Communitarian Law is the entire basis for the supremacy of law clause that overrules all national, state, county and municipal laws in conflict with it.

    Our Common Community

    Americans have a lot more in common with the British than many may realize. On both sides of the Atlantic there is a very quiet and totally identical revolution underway. Commoners from Alaska to London face the same enemy with the same name. What binds them in a way that surpasses all others is the simple fact that neither side knows what exactly their enemy is called.

    ARTICLE | MAY 31, 2010 - 12:00AM | BY NIKKI RAPANA

    It's not hard to notice cameras on every street corner. Their parents may still need personalized retraining, but every school age child has been taught their new responsibilities and requirements. Our national government's new and very serious concerns regarding our health and smoking, drinking, overeating and exercise is impossible to ignore. New strange sounding "wars" are being waged on activities like overeating and freedom of speech. It's no joke anymore that we all may have to pay global taxes on the air we breathe. Inside our private homes we're all dealing with a whole new bureaucratic system that assumed the role of our new Big Mother.

    What we share in common is we're all children in Big Mother's global communitarian family. I do know communitarianism is a mouthful to say and a challenge to spell, but it is the most important word you'll mumble aloud this year. Its use is slipping into the mainstream a little more each month and I think they're gearing up to unveil it before the "unwashed masses."

    Some of you may remember when it was introduced by Tony Blair and New Labour as the Third Way. Now Phillip Blond is reintroducing communitarianism as the newest theoretical political answer to what ails us. The British Conservative Party, under David Cameron, is leading the British communitarian resurgence.

    Former U.S. President Bill Clinton, in a TV interview on April 18, 2010, described Americans as more diverse and communitarian now. This was just the latest of Bill's assertions about American communitarianism, a repeat of speeches he's made in Toronto, Montreal and Berkeley over the past year. For once in his public-private career, Bill Clinton is not lying.

    Communitarianism is a political system that gives authority over individuals to unelected community "stakeholder" councils. A stakeholder is defined as a "group, person, organization or system" which can be just about anybody or anything. You'll find the term used in just about every government and grant funded project in existence today. It's always used as if it means you.

    Forming "partnerships" with "stakeholders" is an effective way to bypass voters and taxpayers living in the affected regions. Their community goals and missions always include "raising public awareness" and advising legitimate government bodies how to adopt the new communitarian laws (never identified as that though, unless it's a former communist new member EU state like Serbia, Croatia or the Czech Republic, or Bolivia and Peru with their new openly communitarian constitutions). Claiming to include more citizens in the democratic process, communitarian councils do just the opposite. And they continually seek more power.

    Bill's right. We are all communitarians now. What that means to us is any body's guess. Most people will adopt the vague party line and agree it's a fresh solution to partisan politics. The libertarians will tell you they like the part about giving power to unelected, self-appointed community councils who have the communitarian power to regulate every one's personal life in the community. The Catholics will tell you they just hope a communitarian spirituality is included. The Protestants, Jews and Muslims won't want to seem selfish so they'll assume a moral value in it somewhere too. The left will dismiss it a right wing conspiracy theory and the far right will call it a communist plot. (If Sarah Palin ever mentions it we can be sure she'll confirm it!)

    Here's the part that our politicians and the "experts" never tell us about communitarianism: it's also the law of the European Union. Communitarian Law is the entire basis for the supremacy of law clause that overrules all national, state, county and municipal laws in conflict with it.

    Lots of really smart people will go to great lengths to explain the theory, how some parts of it make real sense to other smart people. Those same smart people will probably tell you they don't know anything about the law part, sorry. It's just a benign social theory, they say, one that rose and fell already, nothing to worry about. Others will tell you the law's a conspiracy theory.

    Communitarian Law is the law regulating all community based government. At the top level it represents the global community. At the middle level it represents the regional community. At the bottom it represent the local community ("not to be confused with local government." Amitai Etzioni).

    In October, 2004, Professor Jan Mazak, Ph.D., Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic published one of the most amazing descriptions of the EU I've ever come across. In it, he details the "immediate applicability of the communitarian law." He explains that the Slovak Constitution gave the Slovak government the power to sign an international treaty that transferred some of the republic's power over to the EU Courts, telling in no uncertain terms that communitarian law overrules conflicting national laws.

    There was one news report that identified the French and Dutch referendums rejecting the EU Constitution in 2005 as based on voter concerns about the EU's supremacy of communitarian law clause. But both times the Irish voted on it I couldn't find any Irish articles or debates about the EU communitarian legal system Ireland was adopting. I thought that a matter of such importance would become a primary issue in a national vote over joining the EU. It never even became a minor point. The theories of communitarian justice, economics, development, morality, policing and mandatory volunteerism are not up for debate. To join, or not to join, that is the only question.

    But the real dilemma is this: communitarianism is also the philosophical/legal theory for global sustainable development. Communitarian supremacy is the moral philosophy justifying new land and resource use regulations under UN Local Agenda 21. We don't need to accept EU style regional government to become communitarians. Yes the EU Communitarian system of harmonization and norms is the model for all the emerging trade unions from the Middle East to Africa and South America. But we already adopted community government hook line and sinker when we changed our national mission statements to adopt sustainable development principles.

    Americans, like their neighbors across the sea, are manipulated back and forth between the right and the left, and then they're admonished for not thinking more communitarian. Whatever that means.

    Communitarianism enriches experts, stakeholders and compliant citizens only. Individuals who can read and think for themselves need not apply. Voters who insist their national and state law reigns supreme in their nations must be re-educated into more moral, enlightened thinking. Our Common Destiny requires we all share one Common Purpose. We can forget Common Sense, it's completely outdated.