TEA party patriots are a new phenomenon, so new that the Luciferian Rothschild/Rockefeller bankster cabal hasn’t been able to infiltrate it at the top, so they must be discredited and purged from the leadership. They upset the apple cart, so to speak.
Why has the country always, with rare exceptions, moved left no matter which party was in power? The answer should scare you…and then make you furious. We’ve been had, lied to, played like a Stradivarius so as to believe we were free and had a choice in our future.
A money changer in the 1700’s came up with a plan to gain power through money. That man was Mayer Amschel Rothschild, a man of immense intellectual ability. He sent his five sons to Frankfurt, London, Paris, Vienna, and Naples, to establish financial institutions.
He devised a plan, a grandiose plan to set up a one world government. Why and how did he come up with such a plan, I can only speculate. I surmise that Rothschild was a cabalist who tapped into forbidden occult knowledge. Through occultism he was guided by Lucifer, the plan was Lucifer's. If you want to know the details of the plan read ‘The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Israel’.
Don’t be fooled by the story that the document is a forgery, read it and see for yourselves, it reads like a history book of everything that’s happened from the 1700’s till this very day.
There is no way you get the sense that it’s a forgery, how could someone come up with it, it’s too precise, too detailed, too up to date.?
The Rothschild’s spread their tentacles throughout Europe gaining adherents through cabalism, fraternalism, coercion, deception, and oh yes, buying them.
Coming to America
I don’t know but I don’t believe the founding of America was part of this plan. The Pilgrims, the founding fathers, the Constitution, why would they esteem individual freedom if the plan was to enslave mankind. The Great Seal with all it’s occult Masonic symbolism wasn’t a part of the new nation, it came later.
America was just another brick in the wall as far as the plan for a new world order was concerned. As America gained in prominence it became a more integral part of the plan.
How could they undo the Constitution and the ideals of freedom in the political arena? By controlling politics. Create two opposing views and place people at the top of both views. They cultivated the left right paradigm to divide the populace--a house divided against itself.
They created the Democrat Party to espouse their ideals and the Republican Party with an opposition view. The tactic is known as ‘controlled opposition’. That way they gave us the illusion of freedom, the illusion of choice. By controlling both parties it doesn’t matter which party is in power, their agenda wins out every time.
The left right paradigm is the Matrix, it doesn’t matter which party people ‘choose’, in reality, they have no choice as to what direction the country is headed. Unless we break the left right paradigm, the two party system, we’re doomed to a one world government, owned by the Rothschilds!
Having seen House Speaker John Boehner’s antics this year at the Republican National Convention, what is taking place now with the fiscal talks issues are not surprising, but neither is his recent initiation of a purge of true fiscal conservatives from committees on Monday.
The decisions were made by the GOP Steering Committee at a Monday meeting, which reviewed a spreadsheet listing each GOP lawmaker and how often he or she had voted with leadership, three sources said.
Reps. David Schweikert of Arizona and Walter Jones of North Carolina were booted from the Financial Services Committee. Reps. Justin Amash of Michigan and Tim Huelskamp of Kansas were removed from the Budget Committee.
According to a source, Schweikert was told that he was ousted in part because his “votes were not in lockstep with leadership.”
This seems par for the course. If you were not in lockstep with the establishment back in the primaries or the convention you were treated like this too.
According to the article, “All of the lawmakers other than Jones were rebellious right-wingers. Huelskamp and Amash, for instance, both voted against the budget proposed by Budget Chairman Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin in committee and on the floor, because it did not cut spending fast enough. They also voted against the current continuing resolution that is funding the government through the end of March.”
Justin Amash wrote on Facebook that he had not even been made aware of his removal, except by way of finding out from “news reports.” He said that he looked ” forward to hearing from my party’s leadership about why my principled, conservative voting record offends them. That’s sur
e to be a lively and entertaining conversation.”
Amash then asked,
What message does leadership’s heavy-handedness send? It says that independent thinking won’t be tolerated, not even 5% of the time. It says that voting your conscience won’t be respected. It says that fulfilling your commitment to your constituents to work with both Republicans and Democrats to reduce our debt takes a back seat to the desires of corporate special interests. And, most troubling for our party, it says to the growing number of young believers in liberty that their views are not welcome here.
One GOP leadership aide said, “Changes are made for a variety of reasons, most often at the request of committee chairs.”
Another GOP strategist said, “This is a move that the whip team has been advocating for some time. They are using all of the tools at their disposal.”
Rep. Amash is one that is not to be bullied though. The Michigan Congressman said, “If they think kicking me off of a committee will lead me to abandon my principles or stifle my bipartisan work toward a balanced budget, I have a message for them: You’re dead wrong.”
I agree with Mr. Amash. I have contacted his office with regards to an interview to discuss the matter. As of the writing of this article I have not heard back from them yet. The GOP establishment is scared of the Tea Party and wants it silenced, but what they are doing will only bring a louder outcry against them.