Extraordinary measures used to ensure Barak Hussein Obama Presidency—blackmailed even him too

Normally the ‘real rulers of this world’ choose a democrat and a republican and let them duke it out for the presidency, it doesn’t usually matter to them who wins since they control both parties but there was something about the installation of Barak Hussein Obama that was different, he was the chosen one!

I remember when he and Hillary were fighting it out. It was close but she had an ace up her sleeves—the super delegates, everyone was certain they would side with her.

Then she and Obama were whisked away secretly to the Bilderberg meeting one night. I remember because Obama left the press waiting on his campaign plane, waiting for him but he never showed up. They were in a tizzy about being stood up.

Immediately afterwards the worm turned, super delegate Ted Kennedy surprised everyone by throwing his support behind Obama…other super delegates followed suit and the rest is history!

One thing I surmise from this is that Obama was the perfect one to carry out their plans at this specific time. Was it because, as a Kenyan, he has no allegiance to America and could be pushed to accelerate the destruction of America with no hint of conscience at all.

Although It’s hard to think that there is someone more evil than the Bushes and the Clintons, maybe they set things up and Obama was brought in for the kill!

Bush-Era NSA Whistleblower Makes Most Explosive Allegations Yet About Extent of Gov’t Surveillance — and You Won’t Believe Who He Says They Spied On

Jun. 20, 2013 8:09pm Jason Howerton

Russ Tice (Wikipedia)

Russ Tice, a former intelligence analyst and Bush-era NSA whistleblower, claimed Wednesday that the intelligence community has ordered surveillance on a wide range of groups and individuals, including high-ranking military officials, lawmakers and diplomats.

He also made another stunning allegation. He says the NSA had ordered wiretaps on phones connected to then-Senate candidate Barack Obama back in 2004.

“They went after–and I know this because I had my hands literally on the paperwork for these sort of things–they went after high-ranking military officers; they went after members of Congress, both Senate and the House, especially on the intelligence committees and on the armed services committees and some of the–and judicial,” Tice told Peter B. Collins on Boiling Frog Post News.

He went on: “But they went after other ones, too. They went after lawyers and law firms. All kinds of–heaps of lawyers and law firms. They went after judges. One of the judges is now sitting on the Supreme Court that I had his wiretap information in my hand. Two are former FISA court judges. They went after State Department officials. They went after people in the executive service that were part of the White House–their own people.”

Then Tice dropped the bombshell about Obama.

“Here’s the big one,” he said. “[T]his was in summer of 2004, one of the papers that I held in my hand was to wiretap a bunch of numbers associated with a 40-something-year-old wannabe senator for Illinois. You wouldn’t happen to know where that guy lives right now would you? It’s a big white house in Washington, D.C. That’s who they went after, and that’s the president of the United States now.”

FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds and Tice agreed that such wide-ranging surveillance of officials could provide the intelligence agencies with unthinkable power to blackmail their opponents.

“I was worried that the intelligence community now has sway over what is going on,” Tice said.

Tice first blew the whistle on what he alleged was seriously unconstitutional domestic spying across multiple agencies in 2005. He later admitted he was the key source in a bombshell New York Times report that exposed the Bush administration’s use of warrantless wiretapping of international communications in the United States.

The Bush administration admitted to the wiretapping on a small scale but denied Tice’s claims that the tactic was likely being used to gather data on millions of Americans.

NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden also claimed that as an analyst, he could wiretap the phones of anyone, including judges or the president of the United States if he had access to the right information.

Michael Hastings said the Obama administration is at war with the press, shortly thereafter he dies

LA Times Reports Hastings Was Going Into Hiding Before His Death

Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com June 22, 2013

Despite FBI assertions to the contrary, journalist Michael Hastings was under investigation by the agency. In an email sent out hours before his death, Hastings said his “close friends and associates” were being harassed by the FBI and he was going to “go off the radar for a bit,” in other words into hiding. The Los Angeles Times reported on the email on Friday.

At 2:32 into this video, Michael Hastings says the Obama administration is at war with the press.

“Perhaps if the authorities arrive” at the news website Buzzfeed, they “may be wise to immediately request legal counsel before any conversations or interviews about our news-gathering practices or related journalism issues,” he wrote.

Buzzfeed editor Ben Smith added that Hastings had told friends and family “he was concerned that he was under investigation” for his journalism.

Wikileaks also confirmed that Hastings was under investigation by the FBI.

The establishment media is attempting to portray theories about the journalist’s death as unfounded and irresponsible conspiracies. “Since Hastings’ death early Tuesday, wild conspiracy theories have bloomed on the Internet, implying that he was murdered by powerful forces wanting to silence him,” the San Francisco Chronicle reported on Thursday, insinuating that Wikileaks is attempting to exploit the journalist’s death.

During a Reddit interview last year, Hastings said the military had repeatedly investigated him. “The Pentagon has launched three investigations into stories I’ve done over the past 18 months under the pretense of finding the wrongdoing we were exposing. But the investigations were really about creating a Pentagon approved official document to criticize journalism they don’t like,” he said.

Hastings also talked about government attempts to control the internet. “On the one hand, we’re already bombarded with so much government propaganda, it might be hard to notice,” he wrote. “But I think we’d definitely see a more direct targeting of certain communities within the U.S. with propaganda that was produced overseas. I think what we’d also see is all sorts of disturbing online and internet initiatives produced by the government. The Pentagon is already trying to do this.”

Prior to his death, Hastings was working on a story about Jill Kelly, the military socialite who received email messages from Paula Broadwell, the biographer who had an affair with former general and CIA director David Petraeus. Kelly believes the FBI leaked her name to the media to discredit her.

Earlier this month, Buzzfeed posted a final article by Hastings, “Why Do Democrats Love to Spy On Americans.”

As we noted on Thursday, Hastings was renowned for being “only interested in writing stories someone didn’t want him to write — often his subjects,” according to Buzzflash editor Ben Smith. “He knew that there are certain truths that nobody has an interest in speaking, ones that will make you both your subjects and their enemies uncomfortable. They’re stories that don’t get told because nobody in power has much of an interest in telling them.”

Related Articles

• Free Barrett Brown Offers Condolences for Hastings, Urges Immediate Investigation
• Autopsy declares “natural death” for man tasered 4 times by police
• Authorities, Media Dismiss Michael Hastings Assassination Claims
• Evidence Indicates Michael Hastings Was Assassinated
• Is Journalist Michael Hastings a Victim of Obama’s Assassination Policy?

This article was posted: Saturday, June 22, 2013 at 2:10 pm

More intrigue in the Michael Hastings car crash (assassination?) Researching story on Petraeus takedown

Witness recounts one-car crash that killed controversial reporter...

Journalist Michael Hastings in Vermont (Penguin/Rolling Stone)

A driver who witnessed the fiery crash that killed journalist Michael Hastings says the vehicle the 33-year-old was driving shook his car "like a freight truck" as it flew by early Tuesday morning in Los Angeles.

"Was stopped at a red light tonight when a pearl white Mercedes flew past," Michael Carter wrote on Facebook a few hours later. "It shook my car like a freight truck going by. Saw it burst into flames a quarter mile down the road when it hit a tree."

In a Facebook message to Yahoo News, Carter explained in detail what he saw:

I was stopped at the light at Santa Monica [Boulevard], headed south on Highland [Avenue]. I looked down to

• 'Several weeks' to determine cause of death...

Researching story on Petraeus takedown...

Michael Hastings researching Jill Kelley case before death

By Brian Bennett

June 20, 2013, 9:24 a.m.

WASHINGTON – During the weeks before he was killed in a car crash in Los Angeles, reporter Michael Hastings was researching a story about a privacy lawsuit brought by Florida socialite Jill Kelley against the Department of Defense and the FBI.

Hastings, 33, was scheduled to meet with a representative of Kelley next week in Los Angeles to discuss the case, according to a person close to Kelley. Hastings wrote for Rolling Stone and the website BuzzFeed.

Kelley alleges that military officials and the FBI leaked her name to the media to discredit her after she reported receiving a stream of emails that were traced to Paula Broadwell, a biographer of former CIA director David H. Petraeus, according to a lawsuit filed in Federal District Court in Washington, D.C., on June 3.

Petraeus resigned from the CIA after publicly admitting that he and Broadwell had carried on an extramarital affair.

FBI denies tailing reporter...

9/11 preview: FOX airs program plot - US Government hijacking and crashing plane into the WTC

The Lone Gunmen Pilot - 9/11 Predictive Programming

Uploaded on Nov 10, 2009

The pilot episode for the FOX series "The Lone Gunmen" Which first aired on March 4, 2001. The plot envisioned the US Government hijacking a plane and crashing it into the World Trade Center.

Reporter who interviewed Assange, brought down General McChrystal assassinated?

Michael Hastings OBVIOUSLY murdered by bomb on gas tank

Jimstonefreelance.com, June 19 2013

This report is now finished and VASTLY improved. Please re-copy and paste, after a LOT of analysis it's really damning

Permalink

"For all 3 of those normal reasons, which account for virtually all car fires in modern cars, the fire would have started in the engine compartment, progressed slowly, and scorched the hell out of the paint before ever reaching the gas tank. That clean paint is the be all tell all, Michael Hastings was murdered, and the rest is detail."

Video above is from: http://www.mrconservative.com/2013/06/19533-wikileaks-claims-war-journalist-michael-hastings-told-their-lawyers-hours-before-his-death-fbi-was-watching-him/

UPDATE: Accident scenes switched. They swapped cars and locations to hide explosive damage, PROOF IS BELOW

UPDATE: It seems to me that Hastings may have been dead, his car parked there, and then blown up with him in it. This is because the flames are way too fresh for the car to have been there long, there is no impact damage where the car "struck the tree" to cause a gas tank explosion, and there are no flames on the road behind the car to indicate it was blown up while it was moving.

This appears to be a classic mafia hit, where you are killed and then burned in a car to hide the evidence. In this case, they obviously used a bomb to blow the gas tank as evidenced by the fact that the rear portion of the car is blown open and shredded with the rest of the car nicely intact, read the initial analysis below. And obviously, there was no high speed crash as reported by the lie factory. I will be working on this throughout the day.

It was perfect to have this happen on a late late Tuesday night, the quietest night of the week, one so quiet that many restaurants will not open. This would have helped ensure a proper setup with few witnesses.

Take a look at the following screen capture of this "crash" and observe a few things:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. There is no impact damage to this car. The only damage there is BLOWN OUT in the back, not smashed in the front and it obviously missed the tree as it rolled to a stop. The front bumper is obscured by the tree, all the way to the tire, OOPS! .

2. This was a Mercedes, not a Pinto, which means it did not burst into flames on its own. One (seldom quoted) eyewitness said the car "exploded". Interesting stuff.

3. Here is where it starts to get REALLY damning - LOOK AT THE FRONT PASSENGER DOOR. The paint is PERFECT yet the entire car is ablaze. This means that whoever photographed this was on scene right away, with a camera ready to film this in the wee hours of the morning, and nail it before the fire scorched the paint. HMMMMMM . . . . . .

4. Unlike what the so called single "eyewitness" report says about a high speed crash, the car did not impact a tree. The car did not impact ANYTHING. Look at where the car stopped. The car went off the road at a few miles an hour and missed the tree as it rolled to a stop.

5. There is no damage to the front of the car, it has no frontal impact damage AT ALL, it is blown out in the back and not crunched in from the front. HOW ON EARTH DID THAT BLOWN OUT BACK END HAPPEN?

AND FINALLY, THE MOST DAMNING THING OF ALL -

Here we have a car FULLY, and I mean FULLY in flames, from front to back, with NO SCORCHED PAINT because the flame is too new, which means the flame went from the back of the car to the front of the car instantaneously, at the same time it breached the floor and engulfed the passenger compartment before it had a chance to scorch anything, which means ONE THING - A BOMB ON THE GAS TANK, and a PHOTOGRAPHER READY TO SNAP THE PHOTO VERY EARLY ON. Even rapid car fires take time to progress through the car, and totally scorch the paint as they progress. Only a bomb could have blown gas through the floor to the inside of the passenger compartment and under the car all the way to the front of the engine compartment and lit the whole thing up at once. That's the only explanation for the shiny paint while it sits completely engulfed in flames. That flame did not progress through that car, it was blown through it with force and the photographer was on the scene the moment it happened and bagged a perfect shot. I'd like to know how that happened - early morning walk?

I'd like to also mention something here - Sheriff Larry Dever was most likely killed by an ECM hack, because he was driving something big and needed a serious high speed accident. With me, when they tried, the incident was with a semi because I was driving a Geo Metro. And in the case of Michael Hastings, his car was such a safe one that you could not guarantee a death in an incident with a semi, and also could not guarantee a death in a high speed crash. I'd bet Hastings wore his seat belt all the time, and Dever did not, and the murderers would know these details before doing it. So to have Hastings definitely dead, kill him first, put him in his car, and blow the gas tank. It may have been possible to remote control the car to where it is with the engine computer via an ECU hack with the oh so convenient Federally mandated always on 3g cell connection to the heart of the car's control computer with Hastings dead the entire time, and just blow the bomb when the car was where they wanted it. Mercedes are extremely advanced, and it is possible Hasting's car was full drive by wire.

No matter how you slice this particular pie, a Mercedes is not just going to explode into flames without a little assistance. Car fires in new cars happen for three main reasons - running the engine out of oil, or running the engine out of coolant, or after an absolutely huge car mangling accident, having the hot side of the battery short out against the frame before it reaches the fuse panel. And for all 3 of those normal reasons, which account for virtually all car fires in modern cars, the fire would have started in the engine compartment, progressed slowly, and scorched the hell out of the paint before ever reaching the gas tank. That clean paint is the be all tell all, Michael Hastings was murdered, and the rest is detail.

Update: LOCATIONS CHANGED AND PHONY WRECK USED TO HIDE EXPLOSIVE DAMAGE FOR DAY TIME PHOTO OP

Here is what they want you to believe

But that is not consistent with this: And notice the trees.

All of these photos are from the same news video. One question - Why is there a sheet on the front of the car in the photo below? Why are the trees not the same as in the original photo above? Where is the blown out section at the rear of the car, which is CLEARLY visible in the original photo above?

The answer is obvious. THEY SWITCHED CARS AND LOCATIONS FOR THE DAY TIME PHOTO OP. Look at both of these pictures, you can clearly see the car is not the same. The location is not the same. On top of that, why is the car still there the NEXT DAY, 10 hours after the crash, when wrecks always get towed away within a couple hours, as soon as the flames are out? Why is the front end not mangled in the original photo, or even the tree for that matter?

For the day time photo op which should not have been possible anyway (it would have been towed long before) they used a different location with different trees, and interspersed the night time fire photos and the daytime shots with those of a different wreck to show pictures of a car that was not destroyed by a bomb. Just look and think, it is OBVIOUS.

This is so far out there that I had to double and triple confirm I did not screw this up, and indeed I did not, ALL of the photos are frame captures from the exact same news video. They TOTALLY blew it with this one.

This is as messed up as Woolwich.

A note to the setup crew: When you produce your garbage, it is going to be analyzed by a LOT of brilliant people, and if you are not careful your efforts won't cut it. I am ashamed of you, surely the old world Russia or maybe East Berlin would have done this A LOT BETTER.

A note to the world: Take a look at what is here, and remember this the next time you see a bunch of hype about what a great free country America is. They do this to journalists and whistleblowers here.

For those of you who do not know, Michael Hastings was the Rolling Stone reporter who interviewed Assange, brought down General McChrystal, and did several other high level exposures of government corruption.

Obama Database Has 'Information About Everything on Every Individual'

Wonder if Obama (POTUS) has access to the government snooping apparatus for his massive database…

I’ll bet that’s classified too but Maxine wasn’t leaking, she was bragging! What do you think they will use that database for?

This is what the KGB and the Stasi did with their government surveillance and extensive network of informants.

Rep. Maxine Waters: Obama Campaign Database Has 'Information About Everything on Every Individual'

June 10, 2013 - 12:40 PM

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) praised the database she said President Barack Obama created during his presidential campaigns as having "information about everything on every individual" during a Feb. 4 interview on TV One.

- See more at: http://cnsnews.com/video/washington/rep-maxine-waters-obama-campaign-database-has-information-about-everything-every#sthash.M4NRznE2.dpuf

The military-industrial complex: “Maybe Ike was right”, duh!

Maybe Ike was right

posted at 12:41 pm on June 11, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

It’s been a very long time since I read Dwight Eisenhower’s final presidential address to the nation, televised live on January 17, 1961 — two years before I was born.  Now it’s available on YouTube, based on a poor-quality Kinescope made at the time.  The speech became famous for its warning about the dangers to liberty posed by the “military-industrial complex,” which eventually became almost a cliché. Reading it now, it seems more like prophecy in more ways than one:

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together. …

The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system — ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

In my column for The Week, I compare Ike’s warning to what we know now about the NSA surveillance program.  In this case, the threat is the intelligence-industrial complex, and the manner in which we had already surrendered to it before the NSA took advantage of the complacency:

The shift predicted by Eisenhower, of course, did not happen in a vacuum. The Cold War held real dangers to America and Americans, and the age of terror does now. The 9/11 attacks shocked the U.S. badly enough to create a huge demand for more security. We passed the PATRIOT Act and amended the FISA law to allow our intelligence and law-enforcement agencies to “connect the dots” before attacks took place, rather than seek evidence while the bodies were stacked afterward.

At the same time, we have culturally devalued privacy, in relationships with commercial as well as governmental entities. The internet companies involved provide the best evidence of this. US News‘ Robert Schlesinger argued that government surveillance on the internet followed corporate surveillance of Americans and others, a surveillance to which we acquiesced with hardly a murmur of protest. “It’s not a given that corporations must collect vast amounts of information from and about us,” Schlesinger writes. “But failing to do so wouldn’t be good for business.” …

This may be why polls don’t exactly show a high level of outrage over the NSA leaks. AWashington Post/Pew Center poll reported that a 56 percent majority of respondents supported the NSA survey of telecom metadata on phone calls, while only 41 percent objected. When it came to surveying internet content, a thin 52 percent majority opposed the NSA PRISM/BLARNEY effort if applied against Americans (a point which has yet to be clarified), but that 45 percent think the government should go further than it claims to do now to watch our online activities. For an electorate that has given up privacy for convenience to the commercial market, surrendering it to the government for security may be a smaller step than Eisenhower might have imagined.

The erosion of that “political and spiritual heritage” of liberty and limited government has other implications, too. Eisenhower presaged that the expansion of the government under pressure of the military-industrial complex would “endanger our liberties or democratic processes.” One cannot help but to draw connections to that expanding and intrusive government and its unaccountable bureaucracies and the targeting of political groups opposed to the current administration by the IRS, the disparate treatment by the EPA on FOIA requests depending on the politics of the requesters, and the overall lack of accountability from an administration whose best defense on these and other scandals has been ignorance of the abuses taking place on their watch. Even if these incidents come from nothing more than a government so large as to be unmanageable, Eisenhower’s admonitions are still prescient.

Glenn Reynolds warns today that this broad surrender on limited government allows for abuse of power and unchecked corruption on a scale Americans have never before seen:

But, in fact, there’s a common theme in all of these scandals: Abuse of power. And, what’s more, that abuse-of-power theme is what makes the NSA snooping story bigger than it otherwise would be. It all comes down to trust.

The justification for giving the government a lot of snooping power hangs on two key arguments: That snooping will make us safer and that the snooping power won’t be abused.

Has it made us safer? Anonymous government sources quoted in news reports say yes, but we know that all that snooping didn’t catch the Tsarnaev brothers before they bombed the Boston Marathon — even though they made extensive use of email and the Internet, and even though Russian security officials had warned us that they were a threat. The snooping didn’t catch Major Nidal Hasan before he perpetrated the Fort Hood Massacre, though he should have been spotted easily enough. It didn’t, apparently, warn us of the Benghazi attacks — though perhaps it explains how administration flacks were able to find and scapegoat a YouTube filmmaker so quickly . But in terms of keeping us safe, the snooping doesn’t look so great.

As for abuse, well, is it plausible to believe that a government that would abuse the powers of the IRS to attack political enemies, go after journalists who publish unflattering material or scapegoat a filmmaker in the hopes of providing political cover to an election-season claim that al-Qaeda was finished would have any qualms about misusing the massive power of government-run snooping and Big Data? What we’ve seen here is a pattern of abuse. There’s little reason to think that pattern will change, absent a change of administration — and, quite possibly, not even then. Sooner or later, power granted tends to become power abused. Then there’s the risk that information gathered might leak, of course, as recent events demonstrate.

Eisenhower tried to warn us fifty-two years ago about this very outcome.  Maybe it’s time to start listening.

Science fiction has become science fact: The rise of the machines

No, this isn’t about SkyNet and the machines aren’t joining forces against the humans but the humans are mastering machines in the art of war in a way we never imagined. Do you think India is alone in this?

What a boon for the ‘military industrialized complex’! Be afraid, be very very afraid. They come in all shapes and sizes from an insect to a submarine, maybe even smaller and maybe even larger!

If you are deemed an enemy of the State, with the global snooping capabilities of the government revealed recently and machine assassins in all shapes and sizes, we are in deep sh!t!

They even mention directed energy weapons ‘DEW’…can you say 9/11?

India developing robotic soldiers

Posted on June 10, 2013

samaylive.com | Jun 9, 2013

With futuristic warfare in mind, India is working to develop robotic soldiers as part of efforts to boost unmanned fighting capabilities, joining a select group of countries in this endeavour.

Under the project being undertaken by DRDO, robots would be developed with very high level of intelligence to enable them to differentiate between a threat and a friend.

These can then be deployed in difficult warfare zones, like the Line of Control (LoC), a step that would help avert the loss of human lives.

“We are going to work for robotic soldiers. We are going to look for very high level of intelligence in it than what we are talking today… It is a new programme and a number of labs are already working in a big way on robotics,” DRDO chief Avinash Chander told news agency in an interview.

The newly-appointed DRDO chief listed the project for development of robotic soldiers as one of his “priority thrust areas” saying that “unmanned warfare in land and air is the future of warfare. Initially the robotic soldier may be assisting the man.”

He said in the initial phase of the project, the robotic soldier would be required to be told by the human soldier to identify an enemy or a combatant but “slowly in due course of time, the robotic soldier would be at the front end and the human soldier would be assisting him.”

India developing robotic soldiers to replace humans in warfare:

Chander said the need for a robotic soldier is felt to save precious human lives and already robots are used in areas where humans do no want to venture such as defusing bombs or getting inside a high-radiation territory.

“Robotic soldier is one step further. It will have multiple technologies in terms of communication with team members, ability to recognise an enemy,” Chander said.

“Today, you have neural networks, whenever the soldier tells him (robotic soldier) that this is a human solider, he will derive his own logic as to what is the difference between him and others (civilians). That learning process will keep building up,” he said.

Asked if it would be capable of being deployed in areas such as the Line of Control, Chander said, “In due course of time but not before a decade in any way.”

He said many new technologies have to be developed such as “miniature communication, materials, cognitive technologies, self-learning processes and interaction with human.”

Chander said “already five to six countries are actively working. They have not yet developed it fully but they are in fairly advanced stages. This is one of my priority areas.”

Blog: Russians practicing assault tactics in the Midland/Odessa TX area

Is the UN planning action against American Citizens?  This is not the first report I’ve come across that mentions foreign troops on American soil. Some weeks ago there was a story about a huge contingent of Chinese military just across the border in México. There are plenty of reports that Obama and/or Kerry will sign the UN Arms Treaty.

CAN IT BE ANY MORE OBVIOUS THEN THIS-NOTICE POLICE PHOTOS BEING TAKEN FOR TERMINATION

We are fasting and praying with you and for you! Russian troops in
plainclothes have been spotted all over the Midland/Odessa TX area for the
past few months. Last week C-130's were "practicing" low paratrooper drops
in between the cities here. Friends in the police department have been
approached by Russians requesting to take their pictures, and gun shop
owners have been approached by Russians to see their stock not on display.
Obvious recon before the assault.

SECOND CONFIRMATION--Hey Steve,
I can confirm that 6 C-130s were indeed practicing low altitude parachute drops last week in the Midland/Odessa area. They flew right over my house, and they were all in line flying from east to west. I presume they flew out of Abilene. There's also been black helicopter activity in the area too.S.H.

Jun 10, 2013

Related links Arms treaty:

Kerry says US will sign UN treaty on arms regulation despite ...

www.foxnews.com/ politics/ 2013/ 06/ 03/ lawmakers-urge-obama-to-reject-un-arms-treaty-as-it-opens-for-signatu re/ - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

Jun 3, 2013 ... Could UN arms treaty infringe on US Constitution? ... said Monday that the Obama administration would sign a controversial U.N. treaty on arms ... Still, gun- rights supporters on Capitol Hill warn the treaty could be used as the ...

White House suggests Obama will put off signing arms treaty until ...

www.thehill.com/ blogs/ global-affairs/ un-treaties/ 303141-white-house-suggests-obama-will-put-off-signing-arms-treaty-un til-august - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

6 days ago ... Punting the signature to August would allow Obama to sign the pact during ... The treaty covers small arms and calls on states to keep records on "end ... to the U.N. to take a lead role in quickly getting the treaty before the U.N. ...

Obama punts on signing UN arms trade pact opposed by NRA - The ...

www.thehill.com/ blogs/ global-affairs/ un-treaties/ 303041-obama-punts-on-signing-un-arms-trade-pact - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

Jun 3, 2013 ... President Obama will not immediately sign a United Nations arms trade treaty but is ... The NRA insists the pact is a U.N.-backed gun grab.

Obama to Sign UN Gun Treaty During Summer Recess - Breitbart

www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/06/03/Obama-sneaks-arms-trade-treaty - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

6 days ago ... In an attempt to avoid public scrutiny, President Obama plans to sign the controversial United Nations gun treaty in August, when Congress is in ...

Obama to ignore senate, sign 2nd amendment-violating un gun treaty

www.thenewamerican.com/ reviews/ opinion/ item/ 15656-obama-to-ignore-senate-sign-2nd-amendment-violating-un-gun-trea ty - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

1 day ago ... This past Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry said that Obama will sign a controversial gun-control treaty promulgated by the United Nations.

Kerry: US Will Sign UN Gun Control Treaty - Katie Pavlich - Townhall

www.townhall.com/ tipsheet/ katiepavlich/ 2013/ 06/ 03/ kerry-us-will-sign-un-gun-control-treaty-n1612121 - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

6 days ago ... Kerry: US Will Sign UN Gun Control Treaty - Katie Pavlich: Despite ... Last week, 130 members of Congress signed a letter to Obama and Kerry ...

John Kerry pretty pumped about signing off on UN arms trade treaty ...

www.hotair.com/ archives/ 2013/ 06/ 03/ john-kerry-pretty-pumped-about-signing-off-on-un-arms-trade-treaty-wh ite-house-oddly-fine-with-waiting-it-out/ - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

6 days ago ... Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday that the Obama administration would sign a controversial U.N. treaty on arms regulation, despite ...

Obama May Sign U.N. Gun Grab Treaty Tomorrow « Pat Dollard

www.patdollard.com/ 2013/ 06/ obama-may-sign-u-n-gun-grab-treaty-tomorrow/ - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

Jun 2, 2013 ... Excerpted from The Hill: President Obama is hesitant to sign an international arms trade treaty opposed by the National Rifle Association, ...

UN Small Arms Treaty May Be Signed Under Cover Of Darkness ...

www.freedomoutpost.com/ 2013/ 06/ un-small-arms-treaty-may-be-signed-under-cover-of-darkness/ - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

6 days ago ... Instead of taking the opportunity to sign the United Nations Small Arms Treaty on Tuesday, the White House has indicated that Barack Obama ...

Related links foreign troops:

Chinese Troops Reportedly Amassing Near US-Mexico Border

www.activistpost.com/ 2012/ 04/ chinese-troops-reportedly-amassing-near.html - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

Apr 10, 2012 ... Why is it beyond the realm that China would have military in Mexico? ... East has established another home base across the border in Mexico. .... no credible sources, this is why I'll just stick with Land Destroyer instead of ...

UPDATE on Chinese Troops In Mexico - The Strong Watchman

www.thestrongwatchman.com/ news-underground/ 47-news-underground/ 717-update-on-chinese-troops-in-mexico.html - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

Mar 17, 2011 ... Can I just say that I am amazed at the concern about this article. ... Steve Quayle sends eyes across the border to try and get confirmation of ... Chinese, and North Korean military units having been seen in Northern Mexico, ...

Chinese Troops & 10,000 Armored Vehicles Confirmed in Texas ...

www.beforeitsnews.com/ china/ 2012/ 10/ chinese-troops-10000-armored-vehicles-confirmed-in-texas-armed-chines e-troops-in-texas-copying-the-u-s-model-2443674.html - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

Oct 6, 2012 ... Imagine there were armed Chinese troops in Texas, just like there are armed U.S. troops ... Iraq and in over 750 military bases that America has across the globe. .... metropolitan areas along the United States-Mexican border.

A planned Communist invasion of the United States and Canada ...

www.tldm.org/news3/nicaragua.htm - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

Apr 2, 2012 ... These plans are being formulated from Nicaragua, to go into Mexico, ... Thanks to Bill Clinton and China's recent, wholesale acquisition of U.S. military .... and it's stopping just over the left border of Georgia, and there's one ...

border - G2mil

www.g2mil.com/border.htm - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

They want cheap labor pouring across US borders to drive down wages, so they ... US citizens are not demanding new immigration laws, they just want the federal ... Guarding the Mexican border was the Army's primary peacetime mission until ..... While some people worry about China's military, they sh

Chinese army on US border with Mexico - Project Avalon

www.projectavalon.net/ forum4/ showthread.php?43436-Chinese-army-on-US-border-with-Mexico - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

This article is about Chinese troops crossing the US-Mexican border to .... through the information she's allowing her guest to put out have just ...

Think Again: Why China's Military Is Not Yet a Threat - By Drew ...

www.foreignpolicy.com/node/103626 - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

FP Passport: The Obama administration just can't seem to pivot to Asia · FP Passport: ... Certainly, China has made moves over the last few years that have stoked the ..... Mexico because of drugs and uncontrolled cross-border immigration.

Is the Chinese Army Probing Our Southern Flank? (Page 1 of 2)

www.yowusa.com/war/2000/war-2000-12a/1.shtml - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

Dec 1, 2000 ... In the first incident, Mexican troops actually crashed through a fence in ... October 24, at just after noon, a U.S. Border Patrol helicopter clearly ...

More Reports Of Chinese And Cuban Military On US - Mexican Border

www.rense.com/general6/mexborder.htm - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

May 1, 2001 ... They are trained in Mexico by Cubans and Chinese, with a few expatriot ... We continue to hear reports from illegals coming across the border that swear ... " They called the boss 'Fidel' because he had a beard just like Castro.

China Troops In Mexico To Invade US - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZC_NZwVYJE - View by Ixquick Proxy - Highlight

Apr 16, 2012 ... China may be on the verge of invading the US from Mexico. ... Many Military Convoys Now Moving Through the United States - CHINA ... URGENT - Invasion of the USA Emnent - 12 Chinese Military Bases CONFIRMED just South of US ... Obama has shut down our defense system on US/Mexico bor

US guilty of spying on the world but contractor who exposed it must be charged because he violated the law.

Yea, you see how this works; the law protects the criminal acts of the government but punishes the one who exposes it.

There should be a law against the government designating as classified it’s illegal acts! What if criminals could do that?

And slandering the messenger is classic Alinsky! Pray tell me how he or Bradley Manning would ever have been able to “make a statement” on capital hill…

Ex-CIA Officer Baer: China Could be Behind NSA Leaks

Sunday, 09 Jun 2013 06:43 PM By Greg Richter

Officials in Washington are likely looking at Thursday's leak of National Security Agency information as a possible case of Chinese espionage, says a former CIA officer.

Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old NSA contractor who admitted on Sunday he was the leaker of top secret information on the U.S. government's program to cull information from Internet sources such as Facebook and Google, was unwise to flee to Hong Kong, former CIA officer Robert Baer told CNN on Sunday.

"On the face of it, it looks like it's under some sort of Chinese control," Baer said, especially with U.S. President Barack Obama meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping today. "You have to ask what's going on? I mean, China is not a friendly country, and every aspect of that country is controlled."

Snowden could have fled to Sweden, Baer suggested. "And if he really wanted to make a statement, he should have done it on Capitol Hill."

Baer said the timing seemed to be "a pointed affront to the United States." If Obama tries to bring up any complaints of China hacking into U.S. defense contractors' computer system, the Chinese president can just respond that the United States is doing the same thing.

"I can see the Chinese doing that," Baer said.
Though Snowden said in a videotaped interview with The Guardian he feared U.S. operatives would snatch him and return him to the U.S. for trial. Baer said that will never happen.

"We'll never get him from China. There's not a chance. He'll disappear there," he said. "He won't be able to go anywhere else, but if, in fact, the Chinese had a hand in this … they're not about to send him to The United States."

Still, Baer said, the United States has no choice but to charge Snowden since he has revealed classified information.

"I just don't see any way out of it," Baer said. "Whether you agree with him or not, he's violated the law. They cannot let this pass."

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/snowden-guardian-nsa-leak/2013/06/09/id/508874?s=al&promo_code=13C59-1#ixzz2VotLdGrL
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!