seconds: Million 0.0328 years; Billion 31.7 years; Trillion 31,710 years


Visit USADebtClock.com to learn more!

Friday, April 27, 2012

Blood on Obama’s, Jackson’s, Sharpton’s, and the media’s hands…and they want more

Is Obama a white African-American or a black Caucasian?

They will not try to calm this down because, as Andrew Breitbart warned us before he was murdered, Obama’s plan is for ‘racial division’ and the media marches to the same band as Obama!

Motivated By Media Lies About George Zimmerman, a Hate Crime Occurs In Chicago

by John Nolte

We're learning today that in Obama's Chicago, 18 year-old Alton L. Hayes has just been charged by police with "attempted robbery and aggravated battery along with a hate crime" for attacking and robbing a 19 year-old man. Hayes is black, the victim is white, and Hayes told investigators "he was angry about the [Trayvon] Martin shooting and decided to attack the victim because of his race."

Now why would Hayes do this? For starters, Zimmerman is Hispanic, not Caucasian. Secondly, there's absolutely zero proof Zimmerman was racially motivated to shoot Martin. In fact, an overwhelming amount of evidence suggests race had nothing to do with it.

My guess is that if Hayes is telling the truth about his sinister motives, he's been watching too much CNN, MSNBC, NBC, and ABC. After all, those are the media outlets guilty, in some cases, of outright racial fabrication in their zeal to aid Barack Obama's re-election campaign by falsely attributing racism to Mr. Zimmerman's motives.

The bottom line is that if Hayes' professed motive for attacking another man is based on lies told over and over and over again by Obama's Media Palace Guards.

For those of us who monitor the corrupt media, the Trayvon Martin story was on our radars as a media phenomenon. But what confirmed the political motive was when our divisive, polarizing President gave his media minions the green-light to go all-in after he cynically made the shooting of an unarmed Florida teenager all about race ("My son would look like Trayvon").

Florida is a must-win swing state for the President and turnout is where his fortunes will live or die. Ginning up the base brings voters to the polls and nothing gins up Democrat voters like a good old-fashioned racial firestorm. And because the media's in bed with Barack Obama, a racial firestorm (based on misinformation) is what we got.

First came the media's obvious disappointment over the fact that the alleged shooter, a man with the name "Zimmerman," was neither Caucasian nor Jewish. Never ones to let facts get in the way of a witch hunt (remember Tucson), the media solved that little factual problem by making up an entirely new racial category for Zimmerman: "white Hispanic." Like our President, one of Zimmerman's parents is white, and yet we never hear Obama described as a "white African-American."

But of course we don't. That wouldn’t fit the narrative. But in order to cast this story in the kind of light necessary to make enough voters angry to tip Florida Obama's way, Zimmerman cannot simply be Hispanic because that's another voting bloc Obama desperately needs to win the state.

The Narrative Beast was still hungry, though, and required constant feeding. Not only must Obama's Media Palace Guards in some way make Zimmerman white, he must also be turned into a -- duh, duh-duhnnn -- racist! And it was in this department that the sycophant media sold what was left of their souls.

To kick things off, before ABC News examined surveillance tape with the full technology available to them, the network released a half-baked and rushed examination of the tape with this hysterical headline:

"Trayvon Martin Video Shows No Blood or Bruises on George Zimmerman."

The only problem is that ABC News jumped the gun. Later, a full enhancement using all the technology available to ABC showed a pretty serious gash on Zimmerman's head. But the damage was already done. By accident or design, the die was cast for many that Zimmerman had lied about shooting Martin in self-defense after the teenager attacked him.

But the media was just getting started. CNN -- "The Most Trusted Name In News," donchaknow -- went one step further than ABC News. They examined the audio of a 911 tape and before enhancing the audio using the full technology available to them, suggested to the world that Zimmerman had called Trayvon a "f-----g coon."

Later, CNN was forced to walk this back and admit Zimmerman had said no such thing, but once again, by accident or design, the seed Obama so desperately needs planted to divide this country racially, had been planted by his media pals.

But the Crown Jewel of irresponsible racial fraud most definitely goes out to NBC News, who on their oh-so legendary "Today Show" would broadcast to the world 911 audio that had been maliciously edited to make Zimmerman look racist:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. He looks black.

When the truth is that the unedited audio actually went like this:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.

Dispatcher: OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?

Zimmerman: He looks black.

And do I even need to point out the 24/7 smear campaign launched in the fever swamps of MSNBC?

To understand just how sinister the whole of the media has been here, you have to remember that this is the "whole of the media." This isn't Dan Rather with forged documents or those Left-wingnuts at MSNBC.

To aid Barack Obama's re-election campaign to racially divide and enflame this country and most especially a swing-state, the whole of the media ganged up to fabricate, parse, and misinform the public about a private citizen. And guess who was listening….

Alton L. Hayes. And by his own admission, this intentional and politically-driven misinformation campaign created by Obama's Media Palace Guards, motivated Hayes to target and assault an innocent man.

The media is not biased.

The media is not out of touch.

The media is corrupt, and now they have blood on their hands.

The Audacity of the Obama’s, Reveling in Lavishness on Our Dime!

I don’t mind their lifestyle, I just resent paying for it! I am not jealous of the rich and how they spend their money. They can spend their money the way they want, it’s theirs.

But the Obama’s are not content to spend the considerable wealth they’ve amassed as a consequence of their political connections.

Drudge headlines:

Michelle's Spanish Vacation Cost Taxpayers $467,585

Blue collar Dems jealous, angry over lavish vacations
'Fantasy' is to walk out WH 'and just keep walking'
Says she won't run for president

MOST UNPOPULAR GOV'T IN 15 YEARS

The folly of the environmentalists whacko’s

Despite ‘climategate I and climategate II, the thousands of scientists and meteorologists who disagree, the same warming seen on other planets in the solar system, and the fact that there has been no warming in the last decade, the fraud will continue because it’s a major plank in the Luciferian bankster cartel’s plan for a new world order.


They screamed and hollered about how the the Alaskan pipeline would devastate the wilderness wildlife.

Have you seen the pictures of animals hanging around the pipeline basking in it’s warmth?


A suburbanite environmentally conscience homeowner in a subdivision installed solar panels on his roof to do his part to save the planet.

Meanwhile, his next door neighbor decided to plant some trees to do his part to save the planet.

In a few years the neighbor with the solar panels was feuding and wound up suing his tree planting neighbor and green brother because the trees were blocking the sunlight from his solar panels.

It’s a true story, I kid you not!

Here’s another one, ha ha, lol:

State seeks okay to kill federally-protected bird in order to protect endangered fish

 

TimeGlobalCoolingTimeIceAge

AlGore’s palace

AlGore'sHouse

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Newsletter: The United Nations is now planning to change our calendar to accommodate witchcraft

Alas the Rockefeller's used to own the land in Manhattan as a meat processing plant. They gave it to the UN as a "gift." Sort of appropriate in a way, seeing as how it is already soaked in blood.

Here is a short extract from The Last Trumpet Newsletter...
The United Nations is now planning to change our calendar to accommodate witchcraft. The new calendar will be brought into being by U.N. resolution and is to be called “The Thirteen Moon 28-day Calendar of Peace.” (29) In addition to the new calendar, we also know that Maurice Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev are working on an agenda to replace the Ten Commandments with the Earth Charter.

Maurice Strong is the Canadian billionaire who was recently appointed President of the U.N. owned University of Peace. The former Soviet President Gorbachev is the head of the State of the World Forum and has his headquarters in the Presidio in San Francisco, California.

As we consider all of this, we must remember what Daniel prophesied regarding the antichrist. In Daniel 7:25 we read as follows: “And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.”

Zec 12:3 And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it.
Psa 9:17 The wicked shall be turned into hell, [and] all the nations that forget God.
Jer 6:2 I have likened the daughter of Zion to a comely and delicate [woman].

STOCK UP NOW. You should have at least 6 months worth of basics for every member of your household. Stay away from crowds when trouble starts, do not forget water storage, tobacco is worth more than gold or silver, and be kind to hungry children.

Saving polar bears is not the End Game of UN Agenda 21 : a new world order is

The End Game of U.N. AGENDA 21 is far more horrifying:

Karl Koenigs

The COG (Continutity OF Government) U.S. Government planning and the One World U.N. Government, headed by the forty owners of The Federal Reserve cartel pulling all of the Financial puppet strings and through their Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR who drafted U.N. Agenda 21) and IMF divisions have everything well planned and are executing the final steps through all of the Executive Orders and alarming legislation you have been hearing about lately.
The U.S. Government knows that due to contempt for the EIGHTEEN ONLY powers that we granted them under Article I Section 8 (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A1Sec8), pursuant to the 9th and 10th Amendments (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am9) and further contempt for the money clauses of Article I Sections 8 and especially 10 (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A1Sec10), pursuant to the Supremacy clause of Article VI, para 2 (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Article6), our U.S. Dollar is only months away from utter collapse in a 'sudden' black swan 72 hour hyperinflationary event of epic proportions following the last skyrocket ride of the Dow going into hyperdrive to something approaching 16000 and employment in tow. The contempt for the "enumerated powers" clauses (9th & 10th Amendments) has led to TRILLIONS of public debt and UNFUNDED libilities which are totally unsustainable. http://www.usdebtclock.org/

The UNFUNDED Liabilities of Social Security and Medicare alone are $118 TRILLION and increasing at the rate of ONE TRILLION DOLLARS every four weeks and ACCELERATING! Everything remaining the same, just for these two programs alone, all Middle Class taxpayers would need to have 80% Withholding taxes to cover them.

Once "The Matrix", our imaginary economy, as the movie analogy a world that only exists in our programmed imaginations, solely based on imaginary money printed and digitized out of thin air, having an imagined value of 100 cents times the denomination simply printed on it, with only 1 - 2 cents on the dollar in, relative, true underlying value, will soon be revalued by the national and international markets to parity with the REAL world underlying true value.

When this happens, I believe before the election as everything accelerates with additional QEs, every single thing we need to live, food, energy, gasoline, clothing, you name it, will cost FIFTY TIMES what it does today. That puts a gallon of gasoline at $191.00. Loaf of bread $155.00. Average home utility bill at $8,100.00 per month, etc, etc, etc...

Of course hardly anybody can afford that so everything mechanical stops almost in its tracks as all of this will happen like a thief in the night over a 72 hour period. It will be like the movie; The Day the Earth Stood Still. And, then the real horror begins. The U.S. Government, which caused all of this by contempt of the "Supreme Laws" that "We The People" ordained and established on them, will give us an offer most of us cannot refuse.

If we will go to the designated U.N. Agenda 21 cities, turn in our vehicles outside of the city limits where armed guards will park you and register, you and your family will get food, water, shelter, heat and light, while the Government works to resolve all of the problems. Of course you will not be allowed to bring any guns and guns will need to be turned in if you want food or water. Think of the New Orleans Dome during Katrina.

They will allow this offer to continue for several months to separate the Free and the Brave from the Tories, Bolsheviks and cowards who either gladly or willingly surrender the Constitution to the usurpers and despots for the sake of feeding their children and eating. After a few months when the millions of "the masses" check into the U.N. Agenda 21 cities under BIG Brother, they will send out U.N. Peacekeepers, foreign troops and "Blue Forces" (traitor U.S. Troops as designated by Janet Napolitano as troops who will be loyal to the U.S. Government and engage and kill American citizens), to "mop-up" and kill those that refused the "Final Ultimatum" to come into the cities and surrender.
When you register at the check point and register to to into the city or designated towns, they U.S. Government will provide a free implanted RFID Chip that will replace the collapsed dollar as your money: http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/10/16/two-minute-warning-to-big-brother-going-on-line/

That is end game of "Global Warming" and U.N. Agenda 21. Total control under a one world currency called the RFID Chip and a One World "GREEN" hybrid Socialist/Communist/Fascist U.N. Government with no place on earth to run from the IRS.

Obama’s War on Energy: Greens want red blood of oil and gas companies

Obama regime can’t hide their hostility towards Americans having affordable energy. This is not really towards the oil companies who don’t want to drill more as long as they can make just as much money.

This is just part of the overall plan to destroy the American economy for the coming world government. That’s what the whole green movement is about, It’s not about the environment. It’s about the Luciferian bankster cartel’s planned new world order!

EPA OFFICIAL: 'CRUCIFY' OIL & GAS COMPANIES...


'HIT THEM AS HARD AS YOU CAN'...
Senator launches probe over scare tactics...
VIDEO...
Salazar: 'No one knows' if US headed to $9 a gallon...

Two party deception: What is a neocon anyway?

Faux-conservatism is an infantile disorder

Posted on 30 July 2011

Americans who are familiar with the two-party system labor erroneously under the delusion that the Democratic party represents “liberalism,” and the Republican party represents “conservatism.” From within the ranks of each party, its respective members both claim that the other is inherently flawed in their ideology or policy.

This is where the divergence ends, however: both sides claim to be the heirs of the philosophy of the American founders, which in turn was influenced by the philosophy and culture of high antiquity, especially Greek liberalism. In this sense, both American parties are two sides of the same coin, and the same thinking might be applied to various European parties as well.

They certainly cannot be considered to be traditional or classical conservatives in the same tradition of Burke, for in fact, their ideology is totally opposed to it. Nor can they, with their tendency towards humanism, materialism, and secularism, be considered to be culturally conservative. But neither do they conform to the idea of classical liberalism, with their opposition to limited government, free markets, and property rights.

Here, a need for new terminology becomes important. Neo-conservatism has been used to describe the new brand of politician who either call themselves conservative or attempt to subvert true social conservatism, derive their thinking from ultimately Trotskyism, and are proponents of ”a globalist, interventionist, open borders ideology.”

Neo-conservatism then, is a corrupt political viewpoint, being based on the aggregate mixture of both bourgeoisie liberalism and Marxism. It is a viewpoint which is inherently flawed because it denies the existence of a “physical” nation composed of its citizens, and instead makes it an ideological one, as Irving Kristol so brazenly admitted in 2003:

…And large nations, whose identity is ideological, like the Soviet Union of yesteryear and the United States of today, inevitably have ideological interests in addition to more material concerns. Barring extraordinary events, the United States will always feel obliged to defend, if possible, a democratic nation under attack from nondemocratic forces, external or internal.

The history of neoconservatism is worth mentioning. Most neoconservatives had been on the left in the 1930s and 1940s, then moved right in reaction to Stalinism and supported the Cold War. Many were Jewish immigrants from Russia1, and emerged from intellectual milieu of the mid-20th century New York City.Researcher Kevin MacDonald gives this brief summary of neo-conservatism on vdare:

Neoconservatism’s key founders trace their intellectual ancestry to the “New York Intellectuals,” a group that originated as followers of Trotskyite theoretician Max Schactman in the 1930s and centered around influential journals like Partisan Review and Commentary (which is in fact published by the American Jewish Committee). In the case of neoconservatives, their early identity as radical leftist disciples shifted as there began to be evidence of anti-Semitism in the Soviet Union. Key figures in leading them out of the political left were philosopher Sidney Hook and Elliot Cohen, editor of Commentary. Such men as Hook, Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Nathan Glazer and Seymour Martin Lipset, were deeply concerned about anti-Semitism and other Jewish issues. Many of them worked closely with Jewish activist organizations.

Illustrated History of Neoconservatism

This brings us to the nature of modern neo-conservatism, which has evolved into a more sophisticated creature than it has historically been. This sort of sophistication may be called a faux-conservatism, in that they combine some truth into a large matrix of falsehoods, hoping that individuals will swallow the lies along with the truth.

A prime example such sophisticated deception comes in the person of former radical Communist David Horowitz, who penned a book called “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts about the 60′s.” While Horowitz criticizes some superficialities of liberalism, claims that he is a supporter of “free speech,” and seemingly supports many “conservative” ideas, he remains unflinchingly supportive, and on the side of the media elites and liberal bourgeoisie in others.

In a sense, he fits the mold of controlled opposition as a voice who attempts to throw a smokescreen over the faces of passers-by; he attempts to appease a certain segment of the population, but in reality seeks support for his own cause – and the cause of the media elites.

The works of David Horowitz, really do nothing to absolve his work from the charge of subterfuge — in this case on behalf of Israel and the wider war on Islam (keeping in mind that most Muslims, socially speaking, have very conservative values themselves). His book “Indoctrination U.: The Left’s War Against Academic Freedom”, for instance, appears sincere in some parts in its attack on the Left.

But for anyone wishing to look carefully, it is obvious that the main point is to attack critics of Israel, who happen to be leftists. Of course, other pseudo-conservatives will stop at nothing to criticize non-neo-conservatives such as Pat Buchanan or Ron Paul. This is essentially a technique which has been borrowed from the left2.

Of course, it is no hidden fact that a number of faux-conservatives, are also socially liberal. In the Netherlands, the radical homosexual and forerm Marxist Pim Fortuyn fits into this category quite well. Geert Wilders, also from the Netherlands, similarly hold a number of left-wing views, except when it comes to protecting his culture from Islamic immigrants.

Of course, there are also countless more examples in the political sphere. Notably, many of the architects of the Iraq War were self-confessed neo-conservatives: Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, I. Lewis Libby, Elliott Abrams, David Wurmser, and Abram Shulsky. Of course, there are other faux-conservatives as well: they range from people who occupy influential places in academia, like Daniel Pipes, to a whole army of influential bloggers and to clergy.

The problem with neo-conservatism is that it is a faux-conservatism. In other words, it is claiming to be something that it is not. Its proponents claim that it protects the conservative values of the people, while in reality faux-conservatism only exists to forcibly enforce an artificial ideology which contains all the trappings of modernism.

Moreover, they say that they have the antidote to liberalism, while, in reality they are the other side of the same liberal coin. An authentic, spiritual conservatism which is aligned both with Traditional values and with the concept of identities, calls for a reform current society in a conservative-revolutionary direction. This entails the rejection of most, if not all, of the so-called values espoused by today’s neo-conservatives.

In repudiating faux-conservatism, a revolutionary spirit is needed which places emphasis on the state as an organic concept. As Evola states:

“A State is organic when it has a centre, and this centre is an idea that shapes the various domains of life in an efficacious way; it is organic when it ignores the division and the autonomisation of the particular and when, by virtue of a system of hierarchical participation, every part within its relative autonomy performs its own function and enjoys an intimate connection with the whole.”

In order for this to happen, there must be a complete revolution that repudiates both cultural Marxism, and its ideological cousins such as liberalism and neo-conservatism.

References:

1. Alexander Bloom, Prodigal sons: the New York intellectuals and their world (1986) p. 372
2. Jack Kerwick, Neoconservatives vs. Conservatives: Who Are the Real “Extremists”?, The New American. 12 July 2011.

Rasmussen poll: 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To Protect the Individual

These kinds of polls never make it on the nightly news or the NYT and their ilk.

I did a search before I posted this and not one TV news outlet, including cable,  nor one high profile newspaper article ran it.

92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To Protect the Individual

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Voters believe too much government power is a dangerous thing and put a very high value on protecting the rights of the individual.

Sixty-five percent (65%) of Likely U.S. Voters agree with the statement that a government powerful enough to do everything you want is also powerful enough to take away everything you have. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that only 23% disagree with that statement. Eleven percent (11%) are not sure about it. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

The survey of 1,000 Likely U.S. Voters was conducted on April 16-17, 2012 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Search engine returns 0 hits on big media:

  1. 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To ... - Rasmussen Reports

    www.rasmussenreports.com/.../92_favor_strict_limits_on_governme...Cached

    Apr 18, 2012 – 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To Protect the Individual ... 64% Say Federal Government Has Too Much Power and Money · 49% Think ...

  2. Rasmussen: 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government to Protect ...

    www.allamericanblogger.com/.../rasmussen-92-favor-strict-limits-on-...Cached

    6 days ago – Sixty-five percent (65%) of Likely U.S. Voters agree with the statement that a government powerful enough to do everything you want is also ...

  3. 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To Protect the Individual - Digg

    digg.com/.../92_favor_strict_limits_on_government_to_protect_the_...Cached

    Apr 18, 2012 – Voters believe too much government power is a dangerous thing and put a very high value on protecting the rights of the individual.

  4. 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To Protect the ... - SodaHead

    www.sodahead.com/.../92-favor-strict-limits-on-government.../comm...Cached

    Apr 18, 2012 – Wednesday, April 18, 2012 Voters believe too much government power is a dangerous thing and put a very high value on protecting the rights ...

  5. Rasmussen: 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To Protect the ...

    commonamericanjournal.com/?p=42971Cached

    Apr 18, 2012 – Rasmussen Reports 4/18/2012. Voters believe too much government power is a dangerous thing and put a very high value on protecting the ...

  6. RASMUSSEN: 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To Protect the

    lmliberty.us/.../rasmussen-92-favor-strict-limits-on-government-to-pr...Cached

    4 days ago – We do have strict limits on government. It's called the Constitution, we just have a president and a political party that doesn't adhere to it, ...

  7. 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To Protect ... - Free Republic

    www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2873664/postsCached

    Apr 18, 2012 – “I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare ...

  8. 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To Protect the ... - Political Jack

    www.politicaljack.com/.../showthread.php?...92-Favor-Strict-Limits-...Cached

    Voters believe too much government power is a dangerous thing and put a very high value on protecting the rights of the individual. Sixty-five percent (65%) of ...

     
  9. 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To Protect the Individual

    yuuuup-yuuuuup.blogspot.com/.../92-favor-strict-limits-on-governm...Cached

    Apr 18, 2012 – 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To Protect the Individual - Rasmussen Reports™. 92% Favor Strict Limits on Government To Protect the ...

  10. Twitter / Tom Holthaus: 92% Favor Strict Limits on ...

    twitter.com/tjholthaus/status/192725714544504833Cached

Fukushima, world’s worst ecological disaster may get even worse

8.5 tons of radioactive water has leaked…

What happens if the pool covering the fuel rods collapses…

Fukushima Worker Suspects Explosion At Reactor 4 To Be The Cause Of 8.5 Tons Water Leakage (At 301,750,000 Bq)

Whistleblower: ‘Reactor 4 Is Like A Inverse Pyramid, Very Unstable And Dangerous’ – TEPCO Admits It Can’t Stop Reactor 4 Water Leakage

Feb 04

Collapse Of Reactor 4 Spent Fuel Pool Could Cause A Disaster Worse Than The THREE REACTOR MELTDOWNS – Structural Integrity A Major Concern Among Experts (AP)

- More leaks found at crippled Japan nuclear plant (AP, Feb. 3, 2012):

TOKYO (AP) – Leaks of radioactive water have become more frequent at Japan’s crippled nuclear power plant less than two months after it was declared basically stable.

…

Matsumoto said TEPCO also found that 8.5 tons of radioactive water had leaked earlier in the week after a pipe became detached at Unit 4, one of the plant’s six reactors. The company earlier had estimated that only a few gallons (liters) had leaked….

The structural integrity of the damaged Unit 4 reactor building has long been a major concern among experts because a collapse of its spent fuel cooling pool could cause a disaster worse than the three reactor meltdowns.

On Reactor 4:

- Fukushima Worker Suspects Explosion At Reactor 4 To Be The Cause Of 8.5 Tons Water Leakage (At 301,750,000 Bq)

- Fukushima Worker: Reactor 4 Full Of Nuclear Fuel – ‘If Another Earthquake Hits It, It’s Over’ … ‘Pacific Ocean Side Of Japan And West Side Of America Won’t Be Inhabitable Anymore’

Flashback:

- POSSIBLE RED ALERT: Japanese LDP Politician: Hydrogen Explosion May Have Happened At Reactor 4 On Jan. 9, 2012

– Fukushima Worker: Reactor 4 Spent Fuel Pool Completely Without Water, Boiled After New Years Earthquake

- Fukushima: ‘Reactor No. 4 Is Looking More And More Like The Leaning Tower Of Pisa Right Now’ – If It ‘Falls Over It’s Just Gonna Dump A Whole Reactor Core Right Out Onto The Ground’ (And Tokyo & Yokohama Will Be Lost!) (Video)

- Confirmed: Fukushima Reactor No. 4 Is Falling Apart, Wall Was Lost On The South Side (Video, Photos)

- TEPCO: Fukushima Reactor No. 4 ‘Air Duct’ Explosion On 4th Floor

- Reactor 4 Spent Fuel Pool Is Completely ‘EXPOSED’ – Ambulances Heard At Least 10 Times A Day At Fukushima Nuclear Plant (Video)

Prof. Hayakawa of Gunma University:

‘If you don’t educate yourself now and fast, you’ll die.’

You can’t trust Wikipedia, Snopes, FactCheck.org, etc.

Just a friendly reminder, Snopes was started by a hard core Democrat husband wife team with a pc a search engine…that’s all. It wasn’t a big professional research facility.

And FactCheck.org gives it’s liberal bent away in it’s title: FactCheck.org | A Project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center. Think ‘Bill Ayers and Barak Obama’…

And Wikipedia, well, just read on:

Wikipedia Exposed As Part Of Climategate Scandal

Wikipedia, the notorious online encyclopedia, which features the likes of Chip Berlet among its "editors," has been caught in the center of the climategate swindle. According to a report by Lawrence Solomon published in the National Post of Canada, a Wikipedia editor and UK Green Party activist named William Connolley, doctored literally thousands of entries, to conceal the fact that, during the Medieval period, there was a global warming spell, following the Little Ice Age.