seconds: Million 0.0328 years; Billion 31.7 years; Trillion 31,710 years


Visit USADebtClock.com to learn more!

Tuesday, April 21, 2020

Evergreen = EverEvil! Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Khrushchev, Bill Ayers, would be so envious of this indoctrination center

Evergreen State College is a public liberal arts college in Olympia, Washington. Yo staff, Hop on board the Equity Council Canoe--or else! Watch them grovel and cower to climb aboard. Prepare to be shocked, disgusted, and a little frightened! Maybe more that a little frightened as you wonder how prevalent this madness is in our academic institutions.

We kicked prayer, the Bible, and finally God out of our schools and obviously He obliged us. Why did we turn our children over to the State?

Hurray!!! TX lieutenant governor doubles down on economy, coronavirus | Fort Worth Star-Telegram

Great to see some State officials, like in Texas, still have some common sense, unlike many!

I am hearing governors, mayors, health officials, etc. justify their draconian policies saying that if it saves one life it's worth it. Give me a break. If they meant it they would ban automobiles which kill way more, 1.35 million Americans die yearly, than will likely die this entire year on the entire planet from this #CCPflu. They would ban sporting events, smoking, alcohol, guns, knives, sticks, etc., etc., etc. it it would save just one life. Again, GIVE ME A BREAK!!!

Would we ever go to war, I mean, if we could save just one life we should refrain from fighting for God and Country, That's what it sounds like they are saying.

They could save many of the 831,600 lives a study finds will commit suicide because of the coming economic crisis caused by these insane shut-down policies. Hey governors, mayors, health officials, etc., if it would save just one of these 831,600 wouldn't it be worth it to reopen the whole country!!!

TX lieutenant governor doubles down on economy, coronavirus | Fort Worth Star-Telegram

OUT OF SHADOWS OFFICIAL

The Out Of Shadows documentary lifts the mask on how the mainstream media & Hollywood manipulate & control the masses by spreading propaganda throughout their content. Our goal is to wake up the general public by shedding light on how we all have been lied to & brainwashed by a hidden enemy with a sinister agenda.



Massive Fraud at PEPFAR?, are Fauci, Birx, and Pence involved?!

Amazing Polly deep digs PEPFAR

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSfP8sXtMbk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkHDj7eUb60

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoK6h4Mg7E8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkU_m5lpVMc




Who benefits from the #Scamdemic #Plandemic #VirusHoax

1: Health Industry: I wish I had stock in medical related companies. Imagine how much money is being made from PPE: ventilators; masks; gloves; gowns; swabs; tests; etc. and telemedicine companies, and HQC/pharma, and eventually the Bill Gates vaccines for 7,000,000,000 people.

2: Socialism: Citizens have been panicked into accepting severe government control. This is known as trauma based mind-control.

3: Global elites: 

What Can We Learn from the Global Fund’s “Massive Fraud”? | Center For Global Development

News about the Global Fund, fueled in part by a recent FP article by Roger Bate, set off a flurry of tweets and blogs yesterday—so much so that I had to tune out of Twitter to write this. The alleged large scale fraud as described by the FP article doesn’t provide the whole picture (see the Global Fund’s comment, “A Half Truth On Drug Theft,” in response to Robert Bate’s commentary and my colleague Bill Savedoff’s post on how it is not really possible to assess the scale of corruption with the information we have). What worries me is that this type of sensationalist news distorts a few facts that can prompt drastic decisions that ultimately affect people who have nothing to do with the corruption in question. It also distracts attention away from the many development practice problems at hand. But, given this current level of attention, what can we learn from this news that will help the development community address the knotty issues about development and corruption?


RELATED EXPERTS

Nancy Birdsall

Senior Fellow, President Emeritus


Is the Global Fund the Only Offender?

The Global Fund is being singled out as the only offender. Any aid modality that provides large amounts of money to push relatively expensive commodities such as ARVs and combination anti-malarial drugs rapidly through the public sector is going to provide the opportunity for leakages and theft. Let’s examine PEPFAR as a direct comparison—the program has lots of money, but employs different aid mechanism for AIDS prevention, treatment, and care (see the HIV/AIDS Monitor paper Following the Funding for more details). After digging around on the web a bit, here’s what I found:


Not much.

I couldn’t find public information except for one report that came up from the USAID Office of the Inspector General, dated March 2010. In this Worldwide Audit of the PEPFAR-funded Activities and Commodities for the Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission of HIV, I noticed that no recommendations were provided to address identified problems, explaining that these were delivered to specific country missions. This non-transparent sharing of information does not allow us to understand how the U.S. Government is taking action against fraud that occurs in its reputed airtight oversight procedures. On pages 7-9, the auditors describe examples of commodity management problems at four selected missions: Ethiopia, Kenya, Nigeria, and Tanzania.  Poor inventory records were found at all four sites—incomplete stock cards, mislabeling of commodities, lack of regular inventory counts, and poor record keeping. For example:


“In Tanzania, auditors found that 5 of 14 service providers sampled lacked inventory records for commodities, while even those that had inventory records were not always updating them when the commodities were received and dispensed. Without adequate inventory records, the providers’ pharmacy staffs could not determine the current level of commodities on hand, resulting in significant variances between physical counts and inventory records. Consequently, the providers could not determine whether any commodities had been lost or stolen or whether more needed to be ordered.”


All missing and unsupported inventory at the four sites totaled $40,000, out of $39 million (or about 0.1%) in fiscal year 2008 for all PMTCT activities. In comparison, one calculation by Tom Paulson pokes fun at the proportion (0.3% of all grants) of Global Fund corruption that the AP is so troubled by.


Corruption doesn’t only happen with the Global Fund’s monies. Many developing countries are plagued with the same problems—poor management capacity and oversight capacity, and corruption—whether the Global Fund, PEPFAR, or the UN system supports them.  The difference is that the Global Fund actually reports findings from its Office of the Inspector General (OIG) and calls out countries for fraud, while other donors are reported to be highly secretive about any corruption investigation that might affect them, if they conduct them at all. See for example this information from an IOG report to the Global Fund Board from its Finance and Audit Committee (FAC) about a key principal recipient of the Global Fund—the UNDP:


“The Global Fund has been seeking access to internal UNDP audits on Global Fund grants where UNDP serves as PR, but has not been successful. The UNDP's Office of Audit and Investigation has agreed to provide summaries of its audit findings, but the FAC said that, so far, "these summaries have been inadequate." While the OIG has been able to conduct audits "around" the UNDP (e.g., by auditing sub-recipients), "this does not give a sufficient insight into the grant operations and management by UNDP."


When was the last time you heard about a PEPFAR, UN, or World Bank corruption scandal shared with the press by these agencies?  In short, the Global Fund deserves some credit for seeking out perpetrators and holding them accountable publicly. Other donors need to be more upfront about corruption in their programs and how they address it.


What Happened to Country Ownership?


The Global Fund, and more recently, the U.S. Government, believe that countries must be in the driver’s seat for sustained impact.  If donors are serious about this principle, the appetite to take—and learn from—risks is necessary as countries develop their own systems and processes to achieve results.


Through our research under the HIV/AIDS Monitor we learned that PEPFAR minimizes leakages in commodity procurement because it manages this step of the supply chain closely, providing product and technical assistance, rather than cash for countries to buy drugs. In contrast, the Global Fund finances countries to develop procurement capacity—fiscal and operational management and technical assistance. Of course, this hands-off approach contributes to a greater risk of losing both cash and commodities. But, the OIG is actively identifying cases of fraud and taking action, with the objective of slowly but surely changing the way donors and recipients do business.


The Global Fund should be commended for its approach to handling fraud rather than penalized. How long are we going to continue to provide aid that stifles development because donor policies don’t enable countries to manage money and produce results against these investments? That’s why I like my colleagues, Nancy Birdsall and Bill Savedoff’s COD Aid proposal—practical, hands-off financing for verifiable results that can build country ownership. Granted it’s impossible to ensure that no corruption will occur, but funders can take a calculated risk to minimize this by placing more weight on results and rewarding this achievement rather than hyperventilating about corruption and how money is spent. Presumably, countries will spend their existing resources more responsibly in order to get more aid. No results, no money. It’s hard to tell whether COD Aid will work, but the concept is appealing and we will only know if we try.  Rather than locking down on an aid mechanism that is trying to build country ownership, this news should be an incentive for donors to strengthen these models and try new ways of making country ownership more than just donor speak.


What’s the Way Forward for the Global Fund? And for Other Donors?


It is important for taxpayers and beneficiaries to get accurate information about donor funds and how they are spent, relative to the impact of these funds. This is the core of aid effectiveness debates, and what should drive the allocation of scarce resources. When the media distorts numbers and facts to sensationalize a problem I have to ask, “Why now?” As Congress debates the budget with increasing signs that U.S. foreign aid spending is at risk, there seems to be more (read: politics) at play here than actual facts and evidence about the Global Fund’s funding model and oversight capacity.


Nothing I saw in the recent news discusses the five year Global Fund evaluation and how learning from that endeavor and other sources influenced donors decisions at the Global Fund replenishment meeting last fall. The U.S. Government and the Global Fund agreed to specific benchmarks for the Global Fund to strengthen its oversight mechanisms, articulated in this Call to Action from the U.S. Government.  In response, the Global Fund described specific steps that it has taken and continues to take in a document that, to my knowledge, isn’t yet publicly available.


While much damage has been done, the Global Fund and its supporters need to lay out smart and honest messages about its reform measures, and share these widely—perhaps, through an AP story! And most of all, other donors who have perfected a culture of disbursement that feeds a culture of corruption in recipient countries need to come forward with information about how they handle fraud. Outing the perpetrators—whether they receive money from the Global Fund or other donors—is one essential way to make sure that our taxpayer money is being used effectively.


RELATED TOPICS:



FRAUD AND ABUSE OF GLOBAL FUND Senate Prints 112-17

Monday, April 20, 2020

Ron Paul: What If the Lockdown Was All A Big Mistake?

"Countries like Sweden that did not lock down their economy and place the population under house arrest are faring no worse than countries that did. Sweden’s deaths-per-million from coronavirus is lower than in many lockdown countries."



The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity : What If the Lockdown Was All A Big Mistake?







What If the Lockdown Was All A Big Mistake?

undefined

From California to New Jersey, Americans are protesting in the streets. They are demanding an end to house arrest orders given by government officials over a virus outbreak that even according to the latest US government numbers will claim fewer lives than the seasonal flu outbreak of 2017-2018.


Across the US, millions of businesses have been shut down by “executive order” and the unemployment rate has skyrocketed to levels not seen since the Great Depression. Americans, who have seen their real wages decline thanks to Federal Reserve monetary malpractice, are finding themselves thrust into poverty and standing in breadlines. It is like a horror movie, but it’s real.

Last week the UN Secretary General warned that a global recession resulting from the worldwide coronavirus lockdown could cause “hundreds of thousands of additional child deaths per year.” As of this writing, less than 170,000 have been reported to have died from the coronavirus worldwide.

Many Americans have also died this past month because they were not able to get the medical care they needed. Cancer treatments have been indefinitely postponed. Life-saving surgeries have been put off to make room for coronavirus cases. Meanwhile hospitals are laying off thousands because the expected coronavirus cases have not come and the hospitals are partially empty.

What if the “cure” is worse than the disease?

Countries like Sweden that did not lock down their economy and place the population under house arrest are faring no worse than countries that did. Sweden’s deaths-per-million from coronavirus is lower than in many lockdown countries.

Likewise, US states that did not arrest citizens for merely walking on the beach are not doing worse than those that did. South Dakota governor Kristi Noem said last week, “we've been able to keep our businesses open and allow people to take on some personal responsibility." South Dakota has recorded a total of seven coronavirus deaths.

Kentucky, a strict lockdown state, is five times more populated than South Dakota, yet it has some 20 times more coronavirus deaths. If lockdown and house arrest are the answer, shouldn’t those numbers be reversed, with South Dakota seeing mass death while Kentucky dodges the coronavirus bullet?

When Anthony Fauci first warned that two million would die, there was a race among federal, state, and local officials to see who could rip up the Constitution fastest. Then Fauci told us if we do what he says only a quarter of a million would die. They locked America down even harder. Then, with little more than a shrug of the shoulders, they announced that a maximum of 60,000 would die, but maybe less. That is certainly terrible, but it’s just a high-average flu season.

Imagine if we had used even a fraction of the resources spent to lock down the entire population and focused on providing assistance and protection to the most vulnerable – the elderly and those with serious medical conditions. We could have protected these people and still had an economy to go back to when the virus had run its course. And it wouldn’t have cost us six trillion dollars either.

Governments have no right or authority to tell us what business or other activity is “essential.” Only in totalitarian states does the government claim this authority. We should encourage all those who are standing up peacefully and demanding an accounting from their elected leaders. They should not be able to get away with this.
Copyright © 2020 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.

Please donate to the Ron Paul Institute

SURPRISE! Coronavirus Linked To George Soros…Linked To Anthony Fauci…Lin...

Legion of DOOM! Anthony Fauci is the man really leading our nation right now, who is leading him?



Related article:

SURPRISE! CORONAVIRUS LINKED TO GEORGE SOROS…LINKED TO ANTHONY FAUCI…LINKED TO GATES!

Saturday, April 18, 2020

Part 1 & 2 - Time to WAKE UP! | Dr Rashid A Buttar|

Part of their plan is forced vaccinations! It's spelled out in the UN/WHO | Immunization Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy to Leave No One Behind


YouTube deleted parts 3 & 4...





#CORONAVIRUS UPDATE: Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai and Stefan Molyneux (HD)

This is deep but you can handle it. What on earth is going on? You know there is more to this than a virus! This is another real peep behind the curtain. Don't miss this opportunity!



 

Q is for the Queen's Qinetiq - Coronavirus Patent (Mirror)

What on earth is going on? You know there is more to this than a virus! This is a real peep behind the curtain. Don't miss this opportunity!