Remember all those czars Obama appointed along with his cabinet after he was inaugurated in 2008? They just sort of faded from the scene almost as quickly as they appeared. What have they been doing for 8 years? Are we about to find out?
Remember when Obama said they needed a civilian force just as big and well equipped as the military? Remember all the government purchases of guns, ammunition, and survival foods they made?
Fast forward to today as we see BLM and other groups protesting the election of Trump in several US cities. It is no secret that the protestors are largely organized and funded by George Soros who said that the collapse of the USA would be the culmination of his life's work.
Are we in the early stages of a plan of sedition, a plan to overthrow the Trump administration before it can even be installed? It looks like a plan to create chaos thereby giving Obama cover for declaring martial law and forestall the inauguration of Trump!
It is unconscionable that a sitting president would not come out forcefully against protest movements against the president-elect, much less encourage the protestors.
It is no doubt that George Soros is guilty of sedition and inciting to riot and an argument can certainly be made that Obama is guilty of the same. Read the following news articles and see what you think:
Project Gunrunner, better known as ' Operation Fast and Furious', and Benghazi: The deadly connection. United States Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed December 2010. He was shot with a gun that the AFT had allowed a Mexican drug cartel to acquire. It was just one gun of 2000 the cartels were allowed to acquire. It was found that those guns were responsible for at least 150 Mexican civilians being maimed or killed. Less than 800 of the 2000 were retrieved!
The deadly connection with Benghazi is that another ill conceived weapons deal was the cause of a US helicopter being shot down in Afghanistan by the Taliban. In this case the weapons were Stinger missile. However this weapons deal, providing Stinger missiles to the Taliban, was blatantly illegal not to mention insane. Why would the US provide Stinger missiles to terrorists? Regime change in Syria. The US wanted to get rid of the Syrian leader Assad so that an oil pipeline to supply Europe with oil could be constructed. This apparently had to be covered up at all costs. So the lie that a video sparked the incident was concocted after the US Ambassador and the brave men who tried to rescue him were left on their own to die horrible deaths after repeated calls for help were ignored.
Who were the Taliban? They were first called the Mujahideen when the Russians were at war with them in Afghanistan. They morphed into the Taliban, then into al Qaeda, now they are called ISIS. Yes, the US virtually created them.
Hillary’s Benghazi Fiasco Exposed: Did Hillary Clinton Broker Illegal Arms Deals with Libyan Rebels that Spiraled Out of Control…
…and Allowed the Taliban and ISIS to Receive American Surface to Air Missiles that Downed an American Chinook Helicopter and Armed ISIS for the Syrian ‘Regime Change’ War?
Hillary Clinton Illegal Gun Running Scheme in Libya and Syria?
If this is true, then Obama and Hillary Clinton committed serious crimes, including treason.
According to investigative journalists and official sources, Ambassador Christopher Stevens was sent to Benghazi, post haste, in order to retrieve US made Stinger missiles supplied to Ansar al Sharia without Congressional oversight or permission.
Hillary Clinton brokered the deal through Stevens and a private arms dealer named Marc Turi.
Taliban Used US Stinger Missles to Down Chinook Helicopter
Subsequent to that, some of the shoulder fired missiles ended up in Afghanistan used against our own military. It was July 25th, 2012 when a Chinook helicopter was taken down by one of our own Stingers, but the idiot Taliban didn’t arm the missile and the Chinook didn’t explode, but had to land anyway.
An ordnance team recovered the serial number off the missile which led back to a cache of Stingers being kept in Qatar by the CIA. Obama and Hillary were now in full panic mode and Stevens was sent in to retrieve the rest of the Stingers.
DOJ dropped Marc Turi prosecution to keep secret HILLARY SECRET GUNRUNNING to Al-Qaeda-linked terrorists in Libya https://t.co/pL22OyqF24
Benghazi was a “Do-or-Die” Covert Mission: Hillary Clinton let them die to cover her ass…
This was a “do-or-die” mission, which explains the stand down orders given to multiple commando teams. It was the State Department, not the CIA that supplied them to our sworn enemies, because Petraeus (Director of CIA at the time) wouldn’t supply these deadly weapons due to their potential use on commercial aircraft.
General Petraeus Wouldn’t Go Along with the Fraudulent Story: Obama and Hillary Destroyed Him for it…
Then, Obama threw General Petraeus under the bus after he refused to testify that he agreed to the talking points about a spontaneous uprising due to a YouTube video. Obama and Hillary committed treason. This is what the investigation is all about, and why she had a private server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and why Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was because of a YouTube video, even though everyone knew it was not.
The Taliban Knew Obama & Hillary were Exposed: Taliban Hustled them for Return of Five (5) Taliban Generals…
Further, the Taliban knew that this administration aided and abetted the enemy without congressional approval when Boehner created the Select Committee on Benghazi, and the Taliban began pushing the Obama administration for the release of 5 Taliban Generals.
Bowe Bergdahl was just a pawn. Everyone knew that. So it may appear that we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised and a woman that is a serial liar, perjured herself multiple times at the hearing whom is running for POTUS.
Obama DOJ drops charges against alleged provider of Libyan weapons
Partners in Crime: Has Obama Been Covering Up For Hillary Clinton the Whole Time To Cover Himself?
Only the liberals, with their hands out, palms up, will support her. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft was called in, because the administration knew our enemies had Stingers. This might also explain why the Obama administration may have had a significant reason to use as much influence and leverage as possible with his Justice Department in the way in which the criminal investigation was conducted by Comey at the FBI.
Immunity or Cover Up?Why Would the FBI Hand Out 5 Immunity Deals to Key Clinton Staffers: And Get Absolutely NOTHING in Return?
Why else would so many key Clinton staffers receive immunity deals without really being used to move forward with a prosecution of Hillary Clinton? Why would the FBI think it had enough criminal evidence to make 5 different immunity deals with staffers, but then mysteriously not recommend prosecution of Clinton?
It makes it appear as if those deals were not immunity deals at all but rather, cover up deals to cover Hillary, and indirectly, to cover Obama.
Horrific Judgment: No Resolution – This Fiasco Has Led to the Killing of Hundreds of Thousands of Innocent People, has Destroyed Nations Which Were Stable Before and has Provided Absolutely Zero Answers on Key Questions…
The entire fiasco has left far more questions than it has answered and that’s only been made worse by the continuing fountain of email and document leaks regarding Clinton which seem to keep flowing from whistleblower site, WikiLeaks. Could those leaks be originating from inside of the Clinton camp?
To get more of a complete understanding of what actually happened, the following links to investigative journalist reports regarding Hillary’s connection to the matter are very helpful.
Update: Federal whistleblower Stew Webb says on his website that Hillary Clinton is a 5th degree witch. I don't know how many degrees there are but there are at least 7 because he also says Barbara Bush (daughter of Aleister Crowley) is a 7th level witch.
Today, the New York Times reminded us that Hillary Clinton is, by several light years, the candidate closest to willing to disclose any information the United States government is withholding about contact with extraterrestrials. Great! But what about ghosts?
According to decorated Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward’s 1996 book The Choice: How Bill Clinton Won, the third year of Bill Clinton’s first term—marked by the Whitewater investigations and the failure of her health care reform plan—was a difficult time for Hillary Clinton. “She seemed jerked around by the muddled role of First Lady, as she swung between New Age feminist and national housewife. Her place and her role were not clear. Her high sense of purpose and doing good had been thwarted.”
On the advice of her onetime mentor, the psychologist Jean Houston, she sought guidance from her hero, Eleanor Roosevelt. (Eleanor Roosevelt was, at this time, dead.)
One afternoon, Woodward writes in his book, Houston, who had previously been invited to Camp David, joined Clinton in “the solarium, a sun parlor with three sides of glass windows perched atop the White House. It was afternoon and they all sat around a circular table, joined by several members of the First Lady’s staff. One was making a tape recording of the session.” (Ah, ha.) “Fresh fruit, popcorn and pretzels had been set out.”
Houston asked Clinton to imagine Eleanor Roosevelt walking down a hall, and to describe her and talk with her about “the possible future of the children.” Clinton did these things, and then Houston asked her to “open herself up to Mrs. Roosevelt as a way of looking at her own capacities and place in history.
Houston regarded it as a classic technique, practiced by Machiavelli, who used to talk to ancient men. What might Eleanor say? What is your message to her? she asked Hillary Hillary addressed Eleanor, focusing on her predecessor’s fierceness and determination, and her advocacy on behalf of people in need. Hillary continued to address Eleanor, discussing the obstacles, the criticism, the loneliness the former First Lady felt. Her identification with Mrs. Roosevelt was intense and personal. They were members of an exclusive club of women who could comprehend the complexity, the ambiguity of their position. It’s hard, Hillary said. Why was there such a need in people to put other people down?
Later, Houston suggested Clinton should talk to Mahatma Gandhi.
Hillary expressed reverence and respect for Gandhi’s life and works, almost drawing his and her own lives together with her words, opening herself up wide, acknowledging the level of his exertion, empathizing with his persecution. She said he too was profoundly misunderstood, when all he wanted to do was to help others and make peace.
Next, Houston suggested Jesus Christ.
That would be too personal, Hillary finally said, declining to address Jesus.
In his description of the day’s events, Woodward was “confusing the fringe with the frontier,” Houston later told the New York Times. “My whole life has been devoted to pushing the membrane of the possible, to push the boundaries of human capacity.”
“We were using an imaginative exercise to force her ideas, to think about how Eleanor would have responded to a particular problem,” she said. “I have never been to a seance.”
Seems questionable, but we’ll take her word for it. In any case, Clinton is surging ahead with both alien and ghost voters and is surely looking forward to consulting with Eleanor again after her inauguration.
UPDATE: YouTube video found: Despite Houston trying to weasel out of the fact that they channeled Eleanor Roosevelt, telling Woodward that he was “confusing the fringe with the frontier,” that they were using an imaginative exercise--not a seance, Bill Clinton says, in this YouTube video, definitively that Hillary communicated with the dead Eleanor Roosevelt on several occasions:
A new study should convince academics and the general public that there is no “homosexual gene.”
Two distinguished scholars at Johns Hopkins University have released a lengthy, three-part report concluding that there’s not sufficient evidence to prove homosexuals and transgenders are born in that condition – in other words, there is no “gay gene.”
“The understanding of sexual orientation as an innate, biologically fixed property of human beings – the idea that people are ‘born that way’ – is not supported by scientific evidence,” states the executive summary.
“The hypothesis that gender identity is an innate, fixed property of human beings that is independent of biological sex – that a person might be ‘a man trapped in a woman’s body’ or ‘a woman trapped in a man’s body’ – is not supported by scientific evidence,” it adds.
“Homosexual activists have been desperate to try to say they’re ‘born that way’ because they believe this absolves them of their moral responsibility for their sexual behavior,” he shares. “And they know that if the public believes that people are – quote – ‘born gay,’ then the public is much more accepting of homosexual activism. And that’s exactly what we’ve seen in the culture.”
LaBarbera argues that the culture is getting false information from liberal academics and liberal media that present the “gay gene” theory as truth when study after study confirms there’s no such thing.
“I think the evidence is becoming so overwhelming that there is no gay gene that even liberal-minded academics are forced to concede this point,” he adds. “The homosexual lobby and a lot of people in it banked on the gay gene theory to win sympathy. It worked … but the evidence continues to mount against that theory.”
The 143-page report recognizes a corollary between same-gender attraction and sexual abuse as a child. The Johns Hopkins experts also emphasize that sexuality is fluid – which means homosexuals can change; and many have, mostly through Christ.
Dr. Robert Sungenis presentation on Geocentrism in Dallas, Texas
Fifteen hundred years ago everybody 'knew' the earth was the center of the universe--they were right!
What a great presentation on the false theory of heliocentricity. But you might ask, why would they lie to us. I wanted to offer an explanation because it seems crazy that they would or could carry out such a huge lie on the whole world for so long. What follows is an explanation in which I suggest it is a Jesuit plot but they don't work alone. Satan himself--Lucifer is ultimately behind this.
This presentation will thrill the Christian community and exasperate the atheists! Satan (he prefers the name Lucifer) has tried to get mankind to doubt the Word of God from the creation of Adam and Eve. Remember he approached Eve with a question--hath God said? Once he had her attention he then told her God was a bald faced liar, and furthermore he told her that God was holding back on her and her husband Adam; if she partook of the forbidden fruit she would be like God, and God did not want that! In reality God's plan all along was to make His children part of His family!
Freemasonry is the religion of Satan/Lucifer so it is the foundation of the Society of Jesus aka Jesuits and of the Illuminati which followed. It underpins all secret societies!
Following the Protestant Reformation of 1521 AD, Ignatius Loyola, a crypto Jew, created the Society of Jesus aka the Jesuits to counter the reformation in 1540 AD. The Order was established along military lines with it's leader taking the title superior General. It's soldiers take extreme vows and solemn oaths of allegiance to their superiors. The are the original zombies, having no will of their own they blindly follow the orders of their superiors. They've been called God''s marines by proponents and God's assassins by opponents. The English poet Robert Southey (1774-1843), who wrote a famous biography of Lord Nelson, once gave the following famous satirical description of a Jesuit:
A Jesuit may be shortly described as an empty suit of clothes with another person living in them, who acts for him, thinks for him, decides for him whether he shall be a prince or a beggar, and moves him about wheresoever he pleases; who allows him to exhibit the internal aspect of a man, but leaves him none of the privileges – no liberty, no property, no affections, not even the power to refuse obedience when ordered to commit the most atrocious of crimes; for, the more he outrages his own feelings, the greater his merits. Obedience to the superior is his only idea of virtue, and in all other respects he is a mere image. [Quoted inThe Protestant Echo, Vol. XX, 1899, p. 86.]
Hitler copied the Jesuit's organization: "I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits, said Hitler ... Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic Church. I transferred much of this organization into my own party." (Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist chief of the government of Dantzig: 'Hitler m'a dit', (Ed. Co-operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 ss).
http://www.end-times-prophecy.org/the-whore-of-babylon.html
The Jesuits war against the protestant heretics would not be fought with swords and shields but with subterfuge, infiltration, sedition, trickery and deceit. They would destroy the heretic nations from within. I believe their chief strategy was the same as Lucifer, to create doubt in the Word of God. This may seem a strange strategy for a supposed Christian organization but the Catholic Church has never held the Bible as their supreme authority. That is reserved for church tradition and the papacy, so attacking the Word of God would not adversely affect the catholic church as it would the protestants whose watch words are Sola Scriptura in addition to Sola Gratia, so the protestants would be dealt a death's blow were the Word of God subject to serious questioning.
I don't believe it is a coincidence that Copernicus published his theory of heliocentrism in 1543 AD just 3 years after the institution of the Jesuit Order. To understand what the effect of the Copernican Theory all you need to do is read from Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche famously proclaimed that God is dead through a character named Zarathustra in his writing called 'Thus Spoke Zarathustra'.
"Where has God gone?" he cried. "I shall tell you. We have killed him - you and I. We are his murderers. But how have we done this? How were we able to drink up the sea? Who gave us the sponge to wipe away the entire horizon? What did we do when we unchained the earth from its sun? Whither is it moving now? Whither are we moving now? Away from all suns? Are we not perpetually falling? Backward, sideward, forward, in all directions? Is there any up or down left? Are we not straying as through an infinite nothing? Do we not feel the breath of empty space? Has it not become colder? Is it not more and more night coming on all the time? Must not lanterns be lit in the morning? Do we not hear anything yet of the noise of the gravediggers who are burying God? Do we not smell anything yet of God's decomposition? Gods too decompose. God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we, murderers of all murderers, console ourselves? That which was the holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet possessed has bled to death under our knives. Who will wipe this blood off us? With what water could we purify ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we need to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we not ourselves become gods simply to be worthy of it? There has never been a greater deed; and whosoever shall be born after us - for the sake of this deed he shall be part of a higher history than all history hitherto."
Notice what brought about the death of God--Copernicus' heliocentric theory; when we unchained the earth from its sun. This theory has been shoved down our throats since 1543 AD by God's Assassins--the Jesuits and the protestant nations of the world are writhing in death throes.
The video is too large to be uploaded so just click on the link at the top.
Also consider this portion from George Orwell's classic '1984' in which Science is the new religion and mathematicians are the priests--the magicians. They can create anything and everything with numbers and calculations and a formula: E=MC2 is whatever they want it to be. How can we challenge it? There is a portion from Orwell's '1984' which illustrates this. Winston, the subversive, is being reeducated by O'Brien. He begins this part of the session with a statement:
'But how can you control matter?' he burst out. 'You don't even control the climate or the law of gravity. And there are disease, pain, death --
O'Brien silenced him by a movement of his hand. 'We control matter because we control the mind. Reality is inside the skull. You will learn by degrees, Winston. There is nothing that we could not do. Invisibility, levitation -- anything. I could float off this floor like a soap bubble if I wish to. I do not wish to, because the Party does not wish it. You must get rid of those nineteenth-century ideas about the laws of Nature. We make the laws of Nature.'
'But you do not! You are not even masters of this planet. What about Eurasia and Eastasia? You have not conquered them yet.'
'Unimportant. We shall conquer them when it suits us. And if we did not, what difference would it make? We can shut them out of existence. Oceania is the world.'
'But the world itself is only a speck of dust. And man is tiny helpless! How long has he been in existence? For millions of years the earth was uninhabited.'
'Nonsense. The earth is as old as we are, no older. How could it be older? Nothing exists except through human consciousness.'
'But the rocks are full of the bones of extinct animals -- mammoths and mastodons and enormous reptiles which lived here long before man was ever heard of.'
'Have you ever seen those bones, Winston? Of course not. Nineteenth-century biologists invented them. Before man there was nothing. After man, if he could come to an end, there would be nothing. Outside man there is nothing.'
'But the whole universe is outside us. Look at the stars! Some of them are a million light-years away. They are out of our reach for ever.' 'What are the stars?' said O'Brien indifferently. 'They are bits of fire a few kilometres away. We could reach them if we wanted to. Or we could blot them out. The earth is the centre of the universe. The sun and the stars go round it.'
Winston made another convulsive movement. This time he did not say anything. O'Brien continued as though answering a spoken objection:
'For certain purposes, of course, that is not true. When we navigate the ocean, or when we predict an eclipse, we often find it convenient to assume that the earth goes round the sun and that the stars are millions upon millions of kilometres away. But what of it? Do you suppose it is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy? The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that? Have you forgotten doublethink?'
