Executive Orders: The soft dictatorship of POTUS

UPDATE: Soft dictatorship = power exist but isn’t used

When did presidents assume the authority to seize power through executive orders and signing statements? Why did the congress let them.

Adolf Hitler assumed total dictatorship of Germany because the Germans allowed him to change the laws. I guess they didn’t think he would actually use the powers he gave to himself.

Has our congress been negligent or traitorous?

A Comprehensive List Of Obama’s Worst Executive Orders

June 15, 2012 By Laurie Roth

(Editor’s correction: This is a list of executive orders in force that outline Emergency Powers. Some of these were signed by prior US Presidents going back all the way to JFK. Obama specifically has signed executive orders starting with the number EO-13489 and forward. But these all reference powers Obama could use to limit your freedoms. Here is a full list of Obama Executive Orders.)

There have been over 900 Executive orders put forth from Obama, and he is not even through his first term yet. He is creating a martial law ‘Disney Land’ of control covering everything imaginable. Some of the executive orders he has signed recently have been exposed thanks to ‘Friends of Conservative Action Alerts.’ They have compiled a choice list of ‘Emergency Powers, Martial law executive orders’: Get your headache medication out while you still can without a prescription.

* Executive Order 10990 allows the Government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.

* Executive Order 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

* Executive Order 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels, and minerals.

* Executive Order 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.

* Executive Order 11001 allows the government to take over all health education and welfare functions.

* Executive Order 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.

* Executive Order 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

* Executive Order 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate and establish new locations for populations.

* Executive Order 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways, and public storage facilities.

* Executive Order 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issues over a fifteen-year period.

* Executive Order 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

* Executive Order 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute Industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

* Executive Order 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit, and the flow of money in U.S. financial institutions in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when the president declares a state of emergency, Congress cannot review the action for six months.

It is more than clear that Obama is planning for the total control and takeover of America via Martial Law. Food, energy, transportation, work, banking, and health…he has it covered.

---

FOOD INSURANCE: Prepare for hyperinflation, famine, economic collapse, riots, martial law, etc., with emergency food supply, 20 year shelf life.

---

---

While Obama is busy pulling executive orders out of the sky to control everything inside our country, he has been issuing executive orders to force us to submit to international regulations instead of our Constitution. Sher Zieve exposed this in one of her recent articles. Damn the U.S. Constitution, damn the American people and damn U.S. sovereignty.

We must send faxes, emails, and make calls to all congressman and demand they stop Obama’s perverted, extreme, and Unconstitutional abuse of Executive Orders. It is time to demand our elected leaders start protecting America, our sovereignty, and our Constitution. So far, they seem to be protecting the Obama – Marxist takeover plans…peppered with a little U.N. and Islam.

Read more of Laurie’s columns and listen to her on the radio at her website, http://therothshow.com/

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

NATO member Turkey fighter jet shot down: Act of war?

Did Syria take the bait? Regime change in the Middle East is obviously the goal of the new world order. First Iraq, then Afghanistan, then Libya, and now Egypt, which has fallen to the Muslim Brotherhood in the much ballyhooed ‘Arab Spring’ democratic uprising.

Is a Sharia caliphate considered a democracy? Why does the Luciferian bankster cartel want a Muslim caliphate instead of the dictatorships?

Syria confirms it shot down Turkish fighter jet

• Turkey Says Syria Downed Plane in International Airspace
• TURKEY: Cannot be ignored

---

FOOD INSURANCE: Prepare for hyperinflation, famine, economic collapse, riots, martial law, etc., with emergency food supply, 20 year shelf life.

---

---

Eric Holder Can't Wash This BLOOD Off His Hands

Eric Holder Can't Wash This BLOOD Off His Hands

There is almost nothing worse than the loss of a loved one, especially when it is unexpected. Imagine that loved one is a Border Patrol officer guarding the most dangerous stretch of land along the border of Arizona. Imagine if that Border Patrol officer was killed in the line of duty. If that isn't bad enough, imagine that this Border Patrol officer was killed by the very weapons our United States Government sold to the drug cartels of Mexico.

That is just what happened to Border Patrol Officer Brian Terry in 2010 when he was brutally murdered by weapons sold to drug cartels in operation 'Fast and Furious.' The people in charge of this ridiculous and deadly program are denying involvement or any knowledge of the operation.

We have created a video that we would like to run as a commercial to spread the word of the 'Fast and Furious' debacle and to go after those who broke United States' laws with their involvement in this operation for the purpose of pushing their anti-gun rights agenda. We cannot do this alone, please click on the picture below to help take this video public. Also by clicking this picture you can help indict Eric Holder by signing our Citizen's Indictment form. Don't wait for Congress to take action, help make a difference.

---

FOOD INSURANCE: Prepare for hyperinflation, famine, economic collapse, riots, martial law, etc., with emergency food supply, 20 year shelf life.

---

---

Sandusky Guilty: I’d like to get comments from Barney Frank and Ellen Degenerate

GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY

Not only does our government waste our tax dollars they manage to let it be funneled to Castro…

The criminals in our government have spent us into the verge of oblivion and they are so negligent that billions of tax dollars could be going to Cuba and other foreign countries via criminal schemes designed to defraud Medicare and Medicaid.

We have been betrayed by our own representatives either on purpose or through stupidity, either way they are destroying us.

I believe both parties are owned by the R&R Luciferian bankster cartel, the synagogue of Satan, and the trouble we are in today has been planned and orchestrated by them in order to destroy individual freedom and bring about a new world order ruled by them.

WATCHDOGS: Solons worry Medicare billions going to Castro, Cuba

Mark Tapscott  Executive editor

Two U.S. senators and a representative worry that billions of tax dollars could be going to Cuba and other foreign countries via criminal schemes designed to defraud Medicare and Medicaid.

The schemes often involve the use of “nominees,” individuals who are paid to be fronts for the actual owners of corporate entities being used in the fraudulent operation. By concealing the identities of true owners, the approach invites its use to funnel tax dollars out of the country.

---

FOOD INSURANCE: Prepare for hyperinflation, famine, economic collapse, riots, martial law, etc., with emergency food supply, 20 year shelf life.

---

---

In a letter made public yesterday to Marilyn Tavenner, acting administrator of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid, senators Orrin Hatch, R-UT, and Tom Coburn, R-OK, were joined by Rep. Peter Roskam, R-IL, said they fear billions of tax dollars are being lost annually as a result.

“Clearly, the program vulnerabilities that facilitate billions of dollars to be stolen from the Medicare program each year also allow for some of that money to be funneled to foreign countries,” the three congressmen said.

“While the fraud itself is unacceptable, the loss of American dollars to foreign countries because of flaws in our system is totally unacceptable. The American people deserve the peace of mind to know that federal officials are doing everything they can to safeguard taxpayers’ dollars and the Medicare program.”

“Thus far, it does not appear that CMS has addressed the concept of nominee owners, false storefronts, and shell companies in any of its enrollment regulations or its Provider Screening statement of work,” they said

CFACT’s Craig Rucker and Sir Richard Branson squared off at the Rio+20 Earth Summit in Brazil

Over one thousand climate scientists dispute the hypothesis that global warming is man-made, and over 31,000 natural scientists have signed a statement saying there is no convincing evidence that humans are causing catastrophic global warming.

Rio+20 Showdown with Richard Branson

By David Rothbard

Words flew as CFACT’s Craig Rucker and Sir Richard Branson squared off at the Rio+20 Earth Summit in Brazil. Surrounded by Greenpeace activists, Branson was leaving the Greenpeace press conference just as Rucker was entering for CFACT’s press event.

Rucker seized the opportunity to confront the globe-trotting, fossil-fuel-burning Branson about his unlikely position on global warming.

---

FOOD INSURANCE: Prepare for hyperinflation, famine, economic collapse, riots, martial law, etc., with emergency food supply, 20 year shelf life.

---

---

“Sir, do you support the European carbon tax on your own planes going from the United States to Europe?” Rucker asked. Clearly surprised, Branson responded that he would prefer that it be an “international tax, rather than just one area of the world.”

Such an idea is not unheard of. In fact, one of the items on the negotiating table here at Rio+20 is a tax — ranging from 0.2 to 0.7 percent — on international financial transactions, which would generate billions of dollars per year, and would be sent directly to the United Nations. It is unusual for the head of multinational corporations to support such radical policies.

Rucker then asked whether it would be wise for Branson to tax his clients, considering that “support for global-warming science is eroding worldwide.” Over one thousand climate scientists dispute the hypothesis that global warming is man-made, Rucker noted, and over 31,000 natural scientists have signed a statement saying there is no convincing evidence that humans are causing catastrophic global warming.

Nonetheless Branson refused to concede the point, insisted that “even if we are mistaken about that [global warming], I think it is good — we’re running out of oil, so we need to move into clean fuels as soon as possible.”

He’s equally wrong about the world running out of oil. However, Rucker will have to take that up with him next time they cross paths, as Branson was quickly ushered away by his entourage.

— David Rothbard is president of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org and www.CFACT.tv).

History of Sustainability [UN Agenda 21] Nixon, a Republican, created the EPA

History of Sustainability [UN Agenda 21]

On the EPA's website, no less! Very useful to have these UN Agenda 21 related events/organizations acknowledged by a federal agency. Vicky Davis

History of Sustainability

Creation of EPA and NEPA
In the United States, the first establishment of a national policy for environmental sustainability came in 1969 with the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) whose purpose was to "foster and promote the general welfare, to create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony and fulfill the social, economic and other requirements of present and future generations."

---

FOOD INSURANCE: Prepare for hyperinflation, famine, economic collapse, riots, martial law, etc., with emergency food supply, 20 year shelf life.

---

---

On July 9, 1970, amid a growing public demand for cleaner water, air and land, President Nixon submitted to Congress a reorganization plan proposing the establishment of a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as an independent agency in the executive branch of the federal government. The plan proposed bringing together 15 components from five executive departments and independent agencies.
On December 2, 1970, the EPA began its operations, assuming responsibility for carrying out federal laws to protect the environment. Stated broadly, the job of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is to improve and preserve the quality of the environment, both national and global. EPA works to protect human health and the natural resources on which all human activity depends.

The EPA's "History of Sustainability" includes:

Creation of EPA and NEPA [1969]

Stockholm Conference [1972]

United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP)

World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) "Brundtland Commission" [1983]

UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) and 1992 Rio Earth Summit

Agenda 21 [1992]

President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) [1993]

Climate Change [Kyoto Climate Agreement, 1997]

World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) [2001]

Plus:

"Since the WSSD, the United States has been actively engaged in the partnerships and initiatives announced in Johannesburg. These include the

Congo Basin Partnership

Clean Energy Initiative

Water for Poor Signature Initiative

Initiative to Cut Hunger in Africa

Africa Education Partnership

Geographic Information for Sustainable Development

White Water to Blue Water Initiative and

Investing in Health: Fighting Infectious Disease for Sustainable Development"
=========================================

If you're interested in a more extensive timeline, go here:

International Conferences, Treaties, events

http://users.sisqtel.net/armstrng/agenda21.htm

=========================================

Also, I didn't realize the EPA had 10 "Regional Offices":

http://www.epa.gov/epahome/whereyoulive.htm

Goldman Sachs International chairman and former BP chairman tells EU to 'undermine national homogeneity'

No surprise a giant monster megabank chairman wants to do away with nation states. The Luciferian bankster cartel virtually runs the world. Look how completely Goldman has infiltrated the government of the USA. 

• The Goldman Sachs ‘Den of Thieves’

• The banksters plan on raping US: They say ‘pay us before Social Security and Medicare’

EU should 'undermine national homogeneity' says UN migration chief

By Brian Wheeler Political reporter, BBC News

Peter Sutherland's global migration forum brings together 160 nations to discuss policy

The EU should "do its best to undermine" the "homogeneity" of its member states, the UN's special representative for migration has said.

Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.

He also suggested the UK government's immigration policy had no basis in international law.

He was being quizzed by the Lords EU home affairs sub-committee which is investigating global migration.

Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas.

He told the House of Lords committee migration was a "crucial dynamic for economic growth" in some EU nations "however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states".

'More open'

An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the "key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states", he added.

"It's impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated."

---

FOOD INSURANCE: Prepare for hyperinflation, famine, economic collapse, riots, martial law, etc., with emergency food supply, 20 year shelf life.

---

---

“Start Quote

At the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice”

End Quote Peter Sutherland UN special representative for migration

The UN special representative on migration was also quizzed about what the EU should do about evidence from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that employment rates among migrants were higher in the US and Australia than EU countries.

He told the committee: "The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.

"And that's precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine."

Mr Sutherland recently argued, in a lecture to the London School of Economics, of which he is chairman, that there was a "shift from states selecting migrants to migrants selecting states" and the EU's ability to compete at a "global level" was at risk.

'No justification'

In evidence to the Lords committee, he urged EU member states to work together more closely on migration policy and advocated a global approach to the issue - criticising the UK government's attempt to cut net migration from its current level to "tens of thousands" a year through visa restrictions.

British higher education chiefs want non-EU overseas students to be exempted from migration statistics and say visa restrictions brought in to help the government meet its target will damage Britain's economic competitiveness.

But immigration minister Damian Green has said exempting foreign students would amount to "fiddling" the figures and the current method of counting was approved by the UN.

Committee chairman Lord Hannay, a crossbench peer and a former British ambassador to the UN, said Mr Green's claim of UN backing for including students in migration figures "frankly doesn't hold water - this is not a piece of international law".

Mr Sutherland, a former Attorney General of Ireland, agreed, saying: "Absolutely not. it provides absolutely no justification at all for the position they are talking about."

'UK support'

He said the policy risked Britain's traditional status as "tolerant, open society" and would be "massively damaging" to its higher education sector both financially and intellectually.

"It's very important that we should not send a signal from this country, either to potential students of the highest quality, or to academic staff, that this is in some way an unsympathetic environment in which to seek visas or whatever other permissions are required... and I would be fearful that that could be a signal."

Mr Sutherland, who has attended meetings of The Bilderberg Group, a top level international networking organisation often criticised for its alleged secrecy, called on EU states to stop targeting "highly skilled" migrants, arguing that "at the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice" about whether to come and study or work in another country.

Mr Sutherland also briefed the peers on plans for the Global Migration and Development Forum's next annual conference in Mauritius in November, adding: "The UK has been very constructively engaged in this whole process from the beginning and very supportive of me personally."

Asked afterwards how much the UK had contributed to the forum's running costs in the six years it had been in existence, he said it was a relatively small sum in the region of "tens of thousands".

Sustainable Development (UN Agenda 21) : The devious plan to steal sovereignty from America

Under the pretense of saving the planet the Luciferian bankster cartel came up with a plan to rule the world.

They are masters of deception and double speak. They use terms like ‘Sustainable Development’, ‘Smart Growth’, ‘Biodiversity’, ‘Wildlands project’, Wetlands’, etc. to sound like benign, well meaning, programs to save the environment. All the while they are taking our freedoms away one regulation at a time.

If you hear these terms used by your local community planning board, know that they are implementing UN Agenda 21 and stop them in their tracks!

This is from their (IISD) International Institute for Sustainable Development website:

What is Sustainable Development?

Environmental, economic and social well-being for today and tomorrow

Sustainable development has been defined in many ways, but the most frequently quoted definition is from Our Common Future, also known as the Brundtland Report:^[1]

"Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It contains within it two key concepts:

• the concept of needs, in particular the essential needs of the world's poor, to which overriding priority should be given; and

• the idea of limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on the environment's ability to meet present and future needs."

---

FOOD INSURANCE: Prepare for hyperinflation, famine, economic collapse, riots, martial law, etc., with emergency food supply, 20 year shelf life.

---

---

All definitions of sustainable development require that we see the world as a system—a system that connects space; and a system that connects time.

When you think of the world as a system over space, you grow to understand that air pollution from North America affects air quality in Asia, and that pesticides sprayed in Argentina could harm fish stocks off the coast of Australia.

And when you think of the world as a system over time, you start to realize that the decisions our grandparents made about how to farm the land continue to affect agricultural practice today; and the economic policies we endorse today will have an impact on urban poverty when our children are adults.

We also understand that quality of life is a system, too. It's good to be physically healthy, but what if you are poor and don't have access to education? It's good to have a secure income, but what if the air in your part of the world is unclean? And it's good to have freedom of religious expression, but what if you can't feed your family?

The concept of sustainable development is rooted in this sort of systems thinking. It helps us understand ourselves and our world. The problems we face are complex and serious—and we can't address them in the same way we created them. But we can address them.

It's that basic optimism that motivates IISD's staff, associates and board to innovate for a healthy and meaningful future for this planet and its inhabitants.

Contents

• Twenty Years After Brundtland
  This conference was held in Ottawa, Ontario, October 18-19, 2007 to reflect on the past twenty years of sustainable development in Canada since the publication of the Brundtland report in 1987. The presentations are now available as well as information from the conference.

• Ten Years After Rio: Successes and Failures
  Looks at the most important successes and failures in SD in the decade following the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. Published in 2002 to coincide with the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg.

Further Reading

• IISD's Reporting Services is building a sustainable development knowledge base in preparation for Rio+20. Click here to follow international policy developments on sustainability.

• The Sustainable Development Timeline
  Silent Spring was published in 1962. The book's release was considered by many to be a turning point in our understanding of the interconnections among the environment, the economy and social well-being. Since then, many milestones have marked the journey toward sustainable development. The Sustainable Development Timeline captures some of the key events. The original version was published in 1998 with the support of the International Development Research Centre.
  A second edition was published in 1999. The 2002 version, available in English and French, was published for the World Summit on Sustainable Development with the support of Environment Canada. The 2006 version, available in English and Mandarin, was funded by the Canada School of Public Service and the Canadian International Development Agency. The 2007 version, available in English (PDF - 1.1 MB) and French (PDF - 1.1 MB), was supported by Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth. The latest version (2009), is also available in English (PDF - 3.5 MB) and French (PDF - 3.5 MB).

• For our views on how the field of sustainable development is evolving, click here to read IISD's commentaries.

The godfather of global warming lowers the boom on climate change hysteria

Green ‘drivel’ exposed

By Lorrie Goldstein,Toronto Sun

James Lovelock is a world-renowned scientist and environmentalist.

Two months ago, James Lovelock, the godfather of global warming, gave a startling interview to msnbc.com in which he acknowledged he had been unduly “alarmist” about climate change.

The implications were extraordinary.

Lovelock is a world-renowned scientist and environmentalist whose Gaia theory — that the Earth operates as a single, living organism — has had a profound impact on the development of global warming theory.

Unlike many “environmentalists,” who have degrees in political science, Lovelock, until his recent retirement at age 92, was a much-honoured working scientist and academic.

His inventions have been used by NASA, among many other scientific organizations.

---

FOOD INSURANCE: Prepare for hyperinflation, famine, economic collapse, riots, martial law, etc., with emergency food supply, 20 year shelf life.

---

---

Lovelock’s invention of the electron capture detector in 1957 first enabled scientists to measure CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) and other pollutants in the atmosphere, leading, in many ways, to the birth of the modern environmental movement.

Having observed that global temperatures since the turn of the millennium have not gone up in the way computer-based climate models predicted, Lovelock acknowledged, “the problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago.” Now, Lovelock has given a follow-up interview to the UK’s Guardian newspaper in which he delivers more bombshells sure to anger the global green movement, which for years worshipped his Gaia theory and apocalyptic predictions that billions would die from man-made climate change by the end of this century.

Lovelock still believes anthropogenic global warming is occurring and that mankind must lower its greenhouse gas emissions, but says it’s now clear the doomsday predictions, including his own (and Al Gore’s) were incorrect.

He responds to attacks on his revised views by noting that, unlike many climate scientists who fear a loss of government funding if they admit error, as a freelance scientist, he’s never been afraid to revise his theories in the face of new evidence. Indeed, that’s how science advances.

Among his observations to the Guardian:

(1) A long-time supporter of nuclear power as a way to lower greenhouse gas emissions, which has made him unpopular with environmentalists, Lovelock has now come out in favour of natural gas fracking (which environmentalists also oppose), as a low-polluting alternative to coal.

As Lovelock observes, “Gas is almost a give-away in the U.S. at the moment. They’ve gone for fracking in a big way. This is what makes me very cross with the greens for trying to knock it … Let’s be pragmatic and sensible and get Britain to switch everything to methane. We should be going mad on it.” (Kandeh Yumkella, co-head of a major United Nations program on sustainable energy, made similar arguments last week at a UN environmental conference in Rio de Janeiro, advocating the development of conventional and unconventional natural gas resources as a way to reduce deforestation and save millions of lives in the Third World.)

(2) Lovelock blasted greens for treating global warming like a religion.

“It just so happens that the green religion is now taking over from the Christian religion,” Lovelock observed. “I don’t think people have noticed that, but it’s got all the sort of terms that religions use … The greens use guilt. That just shows how religious greens are. You can’t win people round by saying they are guilty for putting (carbon dioxide) in the air.”

(3) Lovelock mocks the idea modern economies can be powered by wind turbines.

As he puts it, “so-called ‘sustainable development’ … is meaningless drivel … We rushed into renewable energy without any thought. The schemes are largely hopelessly inefficient and unpleasant. I personally can’t stand windmills at any price.”

(4) Finally, about claims “the science is settled” on global warming: “One thing that being a scientist has taught me is that you can never be certain about anything. You never know the truth. You can only approach it and hope to get a bit nearer to it each time. You iterate towards the truth. You don’t know it.”