Is Belgium Terror “Made in Israel”? - Zen Gardner

Makia Freeman
Contributor, ZenGardner.com

Is there an Israeli Brussels connection

behind the recent Brussels attack of March 22nd 2016? Whenever an event like this occurs, we not only need to ask ourselves whether it was a false flag attack. We also need to investigate who was behind it, and specifically, whether the clues lead back to Rothschild Zionism and Israel. Why? Because Israel has been involved in so many false flag operations over the years. We know for a fact that they attacked the USS Liberty in broad daylight, despite being an ally of the US at the time. There is strong evidence they attacked Japan by installing bombs at Fukushima to cause the nuclear disaster. Their spy agency Mossad operates by stealth and cunning, and has the motto “by way of deception, thou shalt do war”. Recently, especially in the last 2 decades or so, Israel has mastered the art of propagating a new brand of terrorism – Islamic terrorism. This has involved the devious creation of Muslim hit squads, trained, funded and controlled by Israel, who are then made to carry out various attacks so as to make Muslims look crazy and dangerous, to make Islam look bad, to stir up Islamophobia and hate against all Muslims and to make it more socially and politically acceptable for Western nations like the US, UK, France, Germany and Australia to engage in wars against Muslim countries. Look at Israel’s intimate involvement in orchestrating 9/11. Given the long history of Zionist false flag ops, it’s worth closely examining whether there is an Israeli Brussels connection in this affair … and the evidence suggests there is.

Israeli Brussels Connection: The Motive – Israel’s Public Anger with Belgium over “Made in Israel” Labeling

Click here: Is Belgium Terror “Made in Israel”? - Zen Gardner for the rest of this article

Chipotle attacked because of this?

Chipotle



The food poisoning outbreaks at Chipotle seemed unusual when I heard about them. Why was this one food franchise having such trouble with food poisoning, not just once but more. It was strange but time goes on and I forgot about it until I found out that Chipotle had pledged not to use GMO foods in their franchises. Now who would want to punish them for that? Obviously a very big and powerful agricultural entity

 I know that Monsanto has fought against requiring products with GMO content to be labeled in the USA. I'm not accusing them of sabotaging Chipotle for their stance on not using GMO products but something sure smells fishy here! This is reminiscent of mafia extortion tactics. Not only is Chipotle punished but other restaurants are put on notice, use our GMOs or else!

NON-GMO

The WHO (that's the World Health Organization, not the seminal British rock band) defines Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) as “organisms in which the genetic material (DNA) has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally." Over the years, as we have learned more about GMOs, we’ve decided that using them in our food doesn’t align with that vision. Chipotle was the first national restaurant company to cook only with non-GMO ingredients.

The meat and dairy products we buy come from animals that are not genetically modified. But it is important to note that most animal feed in the U.S. is genetically modified, which means that the meat and dairy served at Chipotle are likely to come from animals given at least some GMO feed. We are working hard on this challenge, and have made substantial progress: for example, the 100% grass-fed beef served in many Chipotle restaurants was not fed GMO grain—or any grain, for that matter. In addition, many of the beverages sold in our restaurants contain genetically modified ingredients, including those containing high fructose corn syrup, which is almost always made from GMO corn.

Jewish Historian: The Invention of the Jewish People

Shlomo-Sand-The-Invention-of-the-Jewish-People-2009.pdf

I believe the misuse of the word Jew is one of the shrewdest contrivances of Lucifer ever in the history of lost mankind, second only to "Yea, hath God said"! It has enabled the very enemies of God to pass themselves off as 'God's chosen people". Who would ever in their wildest imaginations have believed it possible to fool the Church to this extent. Some famous evangelical Christian preachers go so far as to teach that Jews don't need to accept Jesus Christ as their savior because they are already saved by virtue of their being Jewish! I believe this may very well be the "strong delusion" the Scriptures warned us about.

The information below is in my estimation extremely important!!! It clearly shows there is a difference in today's "Jews" and the ancient "children of Israel", they are not the same people!!!!

I ran across some very interesting information recently in the book "The Invention of the Jewish People" by a Jewish historian named Shlomo Sand. I believe this, plus some more information is the smoking gun that proves the Jews of today are not the Hebrews of the Old Testament. Mr. Sand believes the religion of Judaism, as opposed to ancient Hebraism, came into existence after the Babylonian captivity. Here are some excerpts of his research: 

http://www.rafapal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Shlomo-Sand-The-Invention-of-the-Jewish-People-2009.pdf 

Jewish history began with the return of the exiles from Babylonia

For Jost, as for Leopold Zunz, the second important historian in the early days of the science of Judaism, Jewish history began not with the conversion of Abraham, or the Tablets of the Law on Mount Sinai, but with the return of the +exiles from Babylonia. It was only then, they argued, that historical-religious Judaism began, its culture having been forged by the experience of exile itself. The Old Testament had nurtured its birth, but it then grew into a universal

property that would later inspire the birth of Christianity.9

9 On Zunz and the Bible see Reuven Michael, Historical Jewish Writing, Jerusalem: Bialik, 1993 (in Hebrew), 207

Exile: The start of Jewish history

"When the Children of Israel came out of Egypt they were primitive and ignorant," writes Jost. "The Jews in Persia studied and learned from the Persians a new religious outlook, a civilized life, language and science."11  Hence, it was the period of exile, in the broadest sense, that ought to represent the start of Jewish history. The breach between ancient Hebraism and Jewish history came to be the underlying concept for most of the German pioneers of the science of Judaism.12

11 Quoted in Michael, Historical Jewish Writing, 220. 

12 On this subject see Nathan Rotenstreich, Jewish Thought, Tel Aviv: Am Oved, 1966 (in Hebrew), 43.

I mentioned some more information I recently ran across, this is from http://www.karaite-korner.org/history.shtml and is the History of Karaism. The holy book of Jews is the Talmud which they brought with them from Babylon. They will tell you they use the Torah but if it is used it is only ceremonially, their holy book is the Talmud. I was sure there were "Jews" who rejected the Talmud and used only the Torah but I could never find them. Well, I've found them and they are called Karatites! Here is a page from their website:

Karaism is the original Judaism which has existed throughout history under various names incl. Righteous, Sadducees, Boethusians, Ananites and Karaites, all of whom obeyed the Torah with no additions.

Karaism has been around since God gave his laws to the Jewish people. At first those who followed YHWH's laws were merely called "Righteous" and it was only in the 9th century CE that they came to be called Karaites. The question of why God's followers are today called Karaites is really a question of the origin of the other sects. At first there was no reason to label the righteous as a separate sect because there was only the one sect which consisted of the whole Jewish people. Throughout history a variety of sects appeared and it was only to distinguish the righteous from these other groups which caused them in different periods to take on such names as Sadducees, Boethusians, Ananites, and Karaites.

Biblical Period- The Righteous

In the Biblical Period people are described as falling into two categories: the sinners and the righteous. Very often the people were led into sin by false prophets who claimed to be relaying the message of God. In some periods the majority of Israel followed the false prophets and those who remained loyal to YHWH were but a small few (e.g. Elijah at Mt. Carmel). God sent his prophets "from morning till evening" calling on the people to repent but all too often it was only by punishing the nation with a great calamity that YHWH could get them to listen. Much of Biblical history is a repeating of the familiar cycle of sin, punishment, repentance and rescue.

Second Temple period- The Sadducees and the Boethusians

The first reference in the history of Israel to more than one sect takes place some 200 years after the close of the Biblical period, in the first century BCE. Various sources tell us of two opposing sects, the Sadducees (Zadokites) and the Pharisees. The Sadducees followed the Torah as it was written while the Pharisees believed in a second "Oral" Torah which they added to the real one. The Second Temple period saw the rise of several more sects among them another group which only followed the written Torah called the Boethusians and a sect which added several books to the Bible called the Essenes (a.k.a. the "Dead Sea Sect").

Like the Karaites who were to follow them, the Sadduccees and the Boethusians continued the tradition originated by Moses (Dt 4,2) of keeping the Torah's commandments with no addition. We often hear in ancient literature that the Sadducees denied the doctrines of the immortality of the soul and reward and punishment in the hereafter. Whether this is accurate or not is of little consequence since they arrived at these beliefs based on an honest interpretation of the Bible (even if most Karaites disagree with them on these doctrines). The Pharisees on the other hand believed that the interpretation of a particular teacher was divine and elevated these teachings to the level of the Torah itself. After time this doctrine got carried away and they claimed that these teachings originated from God himself in the form of a second "Oral" Torah. They even went so far as to claim that when two teachers taught diametrically opposed interpretations of the Bible that both interpretations were from God! The third major sect, the Essenes, had a Bible which consisted of more than our 24 Books and as a result had practices which do not originate in our Bible such as a solar calendar.

How long these three sects continued to co-exist is unknown. It is often thought that the Essenes and Saducees ceased to exist with the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. However this seems unlikely as writings of the Essenes appear as late as the 10th century which seems to indicate that they survived well after the destruction of the temple. References to the Sadducees and the Boethusians continue to appear in post-70 CE literature and they also seemed to have survived for some time.

Middle Ages- The Ananites and the Karaites

In the early middle ages the Pharisees continued to thrive. They began to call themselves Rabbis and only used the name Pharisees when remembering historical events from the Second Temple period. In the 7th century the Islamic Empire swept the Middle-east. The Muslims had no interest in imposing Islamic religious practice on the Jews and gave them a degree of autonomy under a system known as the Exilarchate. The Exilarchate had been founded hundreds of years before under Sassanian rule but until now only had influence in Babylonia and Persia. Overnight the Rabbanites turned from a localized Babylonian phenomenon into a political power which stretched throughout much of the Middle-east. From the 3rd-5th centuries the Babylonian Rabbanites had developed a body of religious law known as the Babylonian Talmud which they now imposed on every Jew in the Empire.

Resistance to the Rabbinites was fierce, especially in the eastern provinces of the Empire which had never even heard of the Talmud. The historians tell us of Jewish leaders whose resistance against the Talmud put them in direct conflict with the Islamic government, which had empowered the Rabbis and given them full authority over other Jews. One resistance leader who refused to accept the Talmud was named Abu Isa al-Isfahani and it is said that he led an army of Jews against the Muslim government. Other attempts to cast off the Talmud were also undertaken but all failed and the Rabbanites and their Talmud seemed unstoppable.

Then in the 8th century a last glimmer of hope appeared in the form of a shrewd leader named Anan ben David. Anan organized various non-Talmudic groups and lobbied the Caliphate to establish a second Exilarchate for those who refused to live according to the Talmud's man-made laws. The Muslims granted Anan and his followers the religious freedom to practice Judaism in the way of their anscestors. Anan himself was not a Karaite; although Anan rejected the Talmud he used similar irrational methods of interpreting Scripture as the Rabbis, such as intentionally taking words out of context. Anan's followers became known as Ananites and this group continued to exist down until the 10th century. On the other hand, those Jews who continued to practice the Tanach-based religion of their anscestors became known as Bnei Mikra ("Followers of Scripture") which was also abbreviated as Karaim ("Scripturalists"), in English "Karaites". This name derived from the old Hebrew word for the Hebrew Bible: Mikra, Kara. The name Karaim, meaning "Scripturalists", distinguished these Jews from the camp of the Rabbis who called themselves Rabaniyin ("Followers of the Rabbis") or Talmudiyin ("Followers of the Talmud").

Victory: Hungary Orders The Rothschild Banks To Leave The Country | Neon Nettle

Well this is interesting. The article says this is the first country to do so since 1930's Germany. It didn't work out so well for Germany, we'll see if Hungary can avoid a war. I hear that the Rothschild's are pretty good at starting them and financing both sides.

I thought Iceland did something similar just a few years ago.

Victory: Hungary Orders The Rothschild Banks To Leave The Country | Neon Nettle

© press

Hungary, in 2013, finally kicked out the International Monetary Fund (IMF) from its country.

Hungary, in 2013, finally kicked out the International Monetary Fund (IMF) from its country. In July it announced its plans to repay the IMF bailout and for it to vacate the Budapest office. By August the same year, the Central European country had indeed arranged early payment of the loan.

A kindly worded letter from Gyorgy Matolcsy, the head of Hungary’s CentralBank , asked Managing Director, Christine Lagarde of the International Misery Fund, as some have fondly nicknamed it, to close the office as it was not necessary to maintain it any longer.

The Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, seemed keen to ease off austerity measures and prove that the country could go it alone. It in fact issued its first bond in 2011, borrowing off the global markets.

Hungary borrowed €20 billion loan to avoid becoming insolvent during the economic crisis in 2008. But the debtee debtor relationship has not been smooth sailing.

Many criticised the Prime Minister as making an ill-advised decision in order to win an election, which was due in 2014. He also wanted to refrain from having too many foreign eyes on their economic policies, as many reforms were criticised as being undemocratic.

Paying the loan back early has meant Hungary have saved €11.7 million worth of interest expenses, but Gordan Bajnai, leader of the electoral alliance E14-PM, claimed that they had actually lost €44.86 million by March 2014 because of the early repayment as all they did was replace the loan from the International Mafia Federation (another nickname, we’re still talking about the IMF here) with a more expensive one, labelling the stunt as Propaganda .

And what made further nonsense; another loan at high interest rates was signed to finance a nuclear upgrade, which will mean not only higher repayments but also high electricity costs. But they do have economic sovereignty now. 

Many have claimed that the IMF AKA ‘Imposing Misery and Famine’, are owned by the Rothschild group, the biggest banking group in the world, having their fingers in almost every central bank in the world. This means that not only do they make money off usurious interest rates at the misfortune of crumbling economies, they also literally own Governments and people of power – I mean they have considerable influence.

Escaping the banking clutches is therefore, iconic. Iceland joined Hungary in 2014 when it paid back its $400 million loan ahead of schedule after the collapse of the banking sector in 2008 and Russia, of course bowing down to no Western puppeteer, freed itself in 2005.

The return of these three countries to financial independence has been said to be the first time a European country has stood up to the international fund, since Germany did so in the 1930s. Greece is anxiously trying to make payments but missing them as we all stand on the sidelines routing for them to stick two fingers up to the ‘International M***** F******’.

Scientific paper which says the human hand was designed by a 'Creator' sparks controversy | Science | News | The Independent

If anyone was under the illusion that science is objective when it comes to 'God', this article should strike that notion down pretty quickly. It doesn't matter that the article is by scientists! Today's scientific community is blatantly anti-God.

This is just one more reason why I question what scientists tell me, especially NAZI-NASA. Scientists tell me that the sun is 93 million miles away, how do I know that? Just because they tell me. The fact is, you can prove that the sun is less than 5000 miles away with simple math. Since I am not a math whiz I just show you these as examples of how the scientists may be lying to us. Why lie to us? One reason is they hate God and try to undermine belief in Him as a matter of course. I don't know how far away the sun is but I don't trust the scientists to tell me--I can't verify it myself!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAOkg_dHNDM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U50EVXYD8n0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPHckG3o6NQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ly_Cdi89dmE



Scientific paper which says the human hand was designed by a 'Creator' sparks controversy | Science | News | The Independent

A recent scientific paper on the movement of the human hand has faced strong criticism for referring to a 'Creator' throughout.

The paper, titled: 'Biomechanical characteristics of hand coordination in grasping activities of daily living' was written by a team of four researchers, three from Huazhong University in China, and one from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts.

Published in the PLOS ONE journal, the fairly conventional study looked at the mechanics of how we grasp things, and involved the measurement of the hand movements of 30 participants.

READ MORE

'Creationism taught at' free school facing closure

However, members of the scientific community have demanded the paper be retracted, for its several perceived references to the pseudoscientific theory of intelligent design and a possibly divine 'Creator'.

In the opening sentences of the study, it claims the link between muscles and hand movements is the product of "proper design by the Creator."

Later, it says human hand coordination "should indicate the mystery of the Creator's invention," and concludes by again claiming the mechanical architecture of the hand is the result of "proper design by the Creator."

Thanks @PLOSONE for feeding arguments to those who say open access = lower quality. The #Creatorgate article is a harmful disgrace. ಠ_ಠ

— Simon (@simonmd) March 3, 2016

Just found out @PLOSONE published a paper with “evidence” about some “creator”. If not retracted immediately, I will resign as editor.

— Anxo Sánchez (@anxosan) March 3, 2016

"Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator"

I knew PLOS ONE wasn't top tier, but really? So bad. https://t.co/p0c8Sjs6SV

— Chris Intagliata (@cintagliata) March 3, 2016

Naturally, the multiple references to intelligent design in a reputable journal like PLOS ONE have stoked anger in the scientific community, and many people, including researchers who work as editors for the publication, are now calling for it to be retracted.