A sampling of stories (thanks to Climate Depot), since the Climategate story broke in November, that discredit "consensus" global warming science and the UN IPCC -- many from British media:
Greenpeace cited as 'sole source' for 'coral reef degradation' claims
UN climate change panel based claims on student dissertation and magazine article
'Researchers are still grappling to understand the balance of feedback loops'
UN IPCC's Global Warming Report Under Fresh Attack for Rainforest Claims
Analysis: NASA GISS Rural US Sites Show No Temperature Increase Since 1900
BBC: Temperature and CO2 feedback loop 'weaker than thought'
Study: 'Carbon dioxide appears to play a very limited role in setting interglacial temperature'
IPCC cited multiple Master's Students in AR4, some unpublished
And that just scratches the surface, as they say. But what do the intrepid Society of Environmentalist Journalist template-followers at USA Today report about today? Butterflies, in another one of those "scientists say" articles:
A study of beleaguered butterflies in California provides some of the best clues yet as to how other animals may react to climate change, scientists say.
The unprecedented, 35-year analysis of butterfly populations in the Sierra Nevada details how several species are fleeing to higher elevations to escape warming temperatures.
Formerly mainstream American enviro-media sure know how to sniff out a scandal, don't they? Source:
No comments:
Post a Comment