seconds: Million 0.0328 years; Billion 31.7 years; Trillion 31,710 years


Visit USADebtClock.com to learn more!

Friday, August 28, 2015

Supreme Court Justice John Roberts Lauded by Knights of Malta for “ObamaCare” Vote

Remember this? Shortly before the vote I ran across an article that said that Roberts had a billion dollar bank account in the Vatican bank. I then posted a blog predicting that Roberts was on the hot seat because if Kennedy sided with the conservatives then Roberts would have to side with the liberals. It happened just that way!


Universal socialized healthcare has long been the goal of the Vatican and its Secret Societies. So when U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts single-handedly forced United States citizens to accept President Obama’s unsavory and heavily socialist “ObamaCare” legislation 


Supreme Court Chief Justice arrives at the Knights of Malta building in Malta for his meeting with the Grand Master and other officials. Notice the Knights of Malta logo to right of entrance—the 8-pointed spear cross with red background. (AP Photo/Lino Arrigo Azzopardi)
with his deciding (5-4) vote, the American judge, a devout Roman Catholic, won the immediate acclaim of his brothers in such secretive and infamous groups as the Knights of Malta and Opus Dei.


Off to the “Impregnable Fortress” in Malta

Immediately after casting his vote and writing the majority opinion on ObamaCare, John Roberts told the Washington, D.C. press corps that, to escape the furor and controversy that erupted, he was heading to an “impregnable fortress to escape.” Roberts choice of words was carefully coded with secret and embedded meaning.

That impregnable fortress, as it turns out, was to the Mediterranean island of Malta, the unofficial citadel of the papacy’s Knights of Malta. It was to Malta where, after their stunning defeat in Jerusalem, the Knights and crusaders had retreated to what they referred to as their “impregnable fortress.”



European Council President Herman Van Rompuy (left) in Malta
Malta and the New World Order

It was on this same geographic island location where, in 1989, President George H. W. Bush and Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev had met on ships in the harbor and forged the “New World Order.” While the two leaders conferred on-ship, Gorby’s wife, Raisa, dressed in a symbolic, Communist red-colored dress, was taken on a pilgrimage to the Knights of Malta’s historic St. John’s Chapel, where a statue of Jesus’ mother, Mary, holds forth as the chosen icon. It sits on the exact spot where there were found ancient ruins of a great temple devoted to Goddess worship.

At Malta, U.S. Judge Roberts was met by the top potentates of the Rome-headquartered Knights of Malta, including Grand Master Matthew Festig of Great Britain. Also on hand to congratulate Justice Roberts on his monumental socialist “achievement” was Herman Van Rompuy of Belgium, a Bilderberg leader who is currently the President of the European Council.



Thursday, August 27, 2015

LiveLeak.com - Putin: `First Soviet Government Was Mostly Jewish 80-85%`

Putin: `First Soviet Government Was Mostly Jewish 80-85%`





Putin: `First Soviet Government Was Mostly Jewish 80-85%`
image: http://edge.liveleak.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said that at least 80 percent of the members of the first Soviet government were Jewish.



“I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish,” Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.



According to the official transcription of Putin’s speech at the museum, he went on to say that the politicians on the predominantly Jewish Soviet government “were guided by false ideological considerations and supported the arrest and repression of Jews, Russian Orthodox Christians, Muslims and members of other faiths. They grouped everyone into the same category.



"Thankfully, those ideological goggles and faulty ideological perceptions collapsed. And today, we are essentially returning these books to the Jewish community with a happy smile."



http://www.timesofisrael.com/putin-first-soviet-government-was-mostly-jewish/



----- related links -----

Vice President Joe Biden on Jews in America:



“I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else”



"I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry," he said. "The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good."



http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2013/05/22/biden-jewish-leaders-helped-gay-marriage-succeed/



The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution



http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n1p-4_Weber.html



Vladimir Lenin Was Part Jewish, Say Declassified KGB Files



http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2077413,00.html



Senior Orthodox Priest Calls Lenin Worse Than Hitler



http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/senior-orthodox-priest-calls-lenin-worse-than-hitler/467114.html



Jews Are Fleeing Russia Because Of Putin:



http://www.rferl.org/content/jews-are-fleeing-/27107988.html



"Ukraine run by miserable Jews", says Donetsk rebel chief



http://news.yahoo.com/ukraine-run-miserable-jews-rebel-chief-202600090.html



Putin's party unveils Russian 'straight pride' flag



http://europe.newsweek.com/putins-party-unveils-russian-anti-gay-response-same-sex-marriage-330013



Russia Tips The Grand Chess Board



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP3dEyk75sc












Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Gun Control in Germany, 1928-1945 | The New Order

Here is another lie that has been foisted upon the world about NAZI Germany and Adolf Hitler. I have repeated the lie myself before I started to question the things I had been told. The first thing Hitler did when he took over Germany was to confiscate their guns; I had heard it or read it so I repeated it. It's not true like so many other things we've been told about Hitler and WWII.

If people would just do some research instead of keeping their noses glued to the TV (make-believe machine) they would find that the history we've been told is far different than the history that actually happened. I've come to the conclusion that nearly everything we've been told about the past is a lie!

HITLER BELIEVED IN AN ARMED CITIZENRY

Gun Control in Germany, 1928-1945

A common belief among defenders of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is that the National Socialist government of Germany under Adolf Hitler did not permit the private ownership of firearms. Totalitarian governments, they have been taught in their high school civics classes, do not trust their citizens and do not dare permit them to keep firearms. Thus, one often hears the statement, "You know, the first thing the Nazis did when they came to power was outlaw firearms," or, "The first thing Hitler did in Germany was round up all the guns."
One can understand why many American gun owners want to believe this. They see in the current effort of their own government to take away their right to keep and bear arms a limitation of an essential element of their freedom and a move toward tyranny, and they want to characterize the gun-grabbers in the most negative way they can. Adolf Hitler has been vilified continuously for the past 60 years or so by the mass media in America, and certainly no politician or officeholder wants to be compared with him. If the gun-confiscation effort can be portrayed convincingly as something of which Hitler would have approved, it will have been effectively tarred.
This identification of the inclination to deny citizens the right to keep and bear arms with National Socialism and Adolf Hitler has been strengthened recently by clever magazine advertisements which show Hitler with his arm outstretched in a Roman salute under a heading: "All in favor of gun control raise your right hand." A Jewish group, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO), quite noisy for its size, has been especially zealous in promoting the idea that the current gun-control effort in America has its roots in Germany during the Hitler period. This group has gone so far as to claim in several articles published in popular magazines read by firearms enthusiasts that the current restrictive legislation being proposed by the U.S. government is modeled on a gun-control statute enacted by Germany's National Socialist government: the German Weapons Law (Waffengesetz) of March 18, 1938.
Again, one can understand the motivation of the JPFO. Many non-Jewish firearms owners are well aware that the movement to restrict their rights is led and promoted primarily by Jews, and anti-Jewish feeling has been growing among them. They know that the controlled news media, which are almost unanimously in favor of abridging or abolishing the Second Amendment, are very much under the influence of Jews, and they know that the most vocal anti-gun legislators in the Congress also are Jews. It is natural for a group such as the JPFO to mount a damage-control effort and attempt to prevent anti-Jewish feeling from becoming even stronger among gun owners. Their strategy is to deflect the blame from their kinsmen in the media and the government and direct it onto their most hated enemies, the National Socialists — or at least to create enough smoke to obscure the facts and keep the gun-owning public confused.
Unfortunately for those who would like to link Hitler and the National Socialists with gun control, the entire premise for such an effort is false. German firearms legislation under Hitler, far from banning private ownership, actually facilitated the keeping and bearing of arms by German citizens by eliminating or ameliorating restrictive laws which had been enacted by the government preceding his: a left-center government, which had contained a number of Jews.
It is not just that the National Socialist firearms legislation was the opposite of what it has been claimed to have been by persons who want to tar modern gun-grabbers with the "Nazi" brush: the whole spirit of Hitler's government was starkly different from its portrayal by America's mass media. The facts, in brief, are these:
  • The National Socialist government of Germany, unlike the government in Washington today, did not fear its citizens. Adolf Hitler was the most popular leader Germany has ever had. Unlike American presidents, he did not have to wear body armor and have shields or bulletproof glass in front of him whenever he spoke in public. At public celebrations he rode standing in an open car as it moved slowly through cheering crowds. Communists made several attempts to assassinate him, and his government stamped down hard on Communism, virtually wiping it out in Germany. Between upright, law-abiding German citizens and Adolf Hitler, however, there was a real love affair, with mutual trust and respect.
  • The spirit of National Socialism was one of manliness, and individual self-defense and self- reliance were central to the National Socialist view of the way a citizen should behave. The notion of banning firearms ownership was utterly alien to National Socialism. In the German universities, where National Socialism gained its earliest footholds and which later became its strongest bastions, dueling was an accepted practice. Although the liberal-Jewish governments in Germany after the First World War attempted to ban dueling, it persisted illegally until it was again legalized by the National Socialists. Fencing, target shooting, and other martial arts were immensely popular in Germany, and the National Socialists encouraged young Germans to become proficient in these activities, believing that they were important for the development of a man's character.
  • Gun registration and licensing (for long guns as well as for handguns) were legislated by an anti-National Socialist government in Germany in 1928, five years before the National Socialists gained power. Hitler became Chancellor on January 30, 1933. Five years later his government got around to rewriting the gun law enacted a decade earlier by his predecessors, substantially ameliorating it in the process (for example, long guns were exempted from the requirement for a purchase permit; the legal age for gun ownership was lowered from 20 to 18 years; the period of validity of a permit to carry weapons was extended from one to three years; and provisions restricting the amount of ammunition or the number of firearms an individual could own were dropped). Hitler's government may be criticized for leaving certain restrictions and licensing requirements in the law, but the National Socialists had no intention of preventing law-abiding Germans from keeping or bearing arms. Again, the firearms law enacted by Hitler's government enhanced the rights of Germans to keep and bear arms; no new restrictions were added, and many pre-existing restrictions were relaxed or eliminated.
  • At the end of the Second World War, American GIs in the occupying force were astounded to discover how many German civilians owned private firearms. Tens of thousands of pistols looted from German homes by GIs were brought back to the United States after the war. In 1945 General Eisenhower ordered all privately owned firearms in the American occupation zone of Germany confiscated, and Germans were required to hand in their shotguns and rifles as well as any handguns which had not already been stolen. In the Soviet occupation zone German civilians were summarily shot if they were found in possession of even a single cartridge.
  • Jews, it should be noted, were not Germans, even if they had been born in Germany. The National Socialists defined citizenship in ethnic terms, and under Hitler Jews were not accorded full rights of citizenship. National Socialist legislation progressively excluded Jews from key professions: teaching, the media, the practice of law, etc. The aim was not only to free German life from an oppressive and degenerative Jewish influence, but to persuade Jews to emigrate. The German Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, specifically excluded Jews from manufacturing or dealing in firearms or munitions, but it did not exclude them from owning or bearing personal firearms. The exclusion of Jews from the firearms business rankled them as much as any other exclusion, and in their typically ethnocentric fashion they have misrepresented the law involved as an anti-gun law in an effort to cast their enemies in a bad light.
It should be noted in passing that the restrictions placed on Jews by the National Socialists had the intended effect: between 1933 and 1939 two-thirds of the Jews residing in Germany emigrated, reducing the Jewish population of the country from 600,000 when Hitler became Chancellor in 1933 to 200,000 at the outbreak of the Second World War in 1939. Jews in the United States, looking at this period from their own narrowly focused viewpoint, have described these peacetime years of the National Socialist government as a time of darkness, terror and regression, whereas for the German people it was a time of hope, joy, and spiritual and material renewal.
Much the same type of distortion is seen in the portrayal of the United States in the early 1950s: the so-called "McCarthy Era." Senator Joseph McCarthy (Republican, Wisconsin) used his position as chairman of the Senate's Government Operations Committee to expose the widespread Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other U.S. institutions which had taken place during the Second World War. A substantial majority of the Communists who were dragged reluctantly out into the light of day by his efforts were Jews. As a result, the controlled media always have portrayed the period as one of terror and repression, when everyone was frightened of Senator McCarthy's "witch hunt." Of course, it was nothing of the sort to non-Jewish Americans, who were not intimidated in the least. History viewed through a Jewish lens — i.e., through media controlled by Jews — always is distorted in a way corresponding to Jewish interests and concerns.
[To understand the significance of the German Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, enacted by the National Socialists, and the Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 12, 1928, which was enacted by an anti-National Socialist government, a little background information first may help the reader.]
After Germany's defeat in the First World War (a defeat in which Germany's Jews played no small part, demoralizing the home front with demonstrations and other subversive activity, much as they did in America during the Vietnam war), the Kaiser abdicated, and liberals and leftists seized control of the government in 1918. Hitler, recovering in a military hospital from a British poison-gas attack which had blinded him temporarily, made the decision to go into politics and fight against the traitors he felt were responsible for Germany's distress.
The tendency of Germany's new rulers after the First World War was much the same as it is for the liberals in America today: they promoted cosmopolitanism, internationalism and egalitarianism. By 1923 economic conditions in Germany had become catastrophic, and there was much public unrest. The Communists had made major inroads into the labor movement and were a growing threat to the country.
Hitler had indeed gone into politics, and his National Socialists battled the Communists in the streets of Germany's cities and gradually came to be seen by many patriotic Germans in the working class and the middle class as the only force which could save Germany from a Communist takeover and total ruin. Hitler's National Socialists continued to win recruits and gain strength during the 1920s. The Communists, with aid from the Soviet Union, also continued to grow. The political situation became increasingly unstable, as the government lost popular support.
The government's response was to substantially tighten up restrictions on the rights of German citizens to keep and bear arms. The Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 12, 1928, was the most substantial effort in this regard. This law was enacted by a left-center government hostile to the National Socialists (the government was headed by Chancellor Wilhelm Marx and consisted of a coalition of Socialists, including many Jews and Catholic Centrists).
Five years later, in 1933, the National Socialists were in power, Hitler headed the government, and the Communist threat was crushed decisively. The National Socialists began undoing the social and economic damage done by their predecessors. Germany was restored to full employment, degeneracy and corruption were rooted out, Jews and their collaborators were removed from one facet of national life after another, and the German people entered a new era of national freedom, health, and prosperity.
Finally, in 1938, the National Socialist government got around to enacting a new firearms law to replace the one enacted by their opponents ten years earlier. The highlights of the 1938 law, especially as it applied to ordinary citizens, rather than manufacturers or dealers, follow:
  • Handguns may be purchased only on submission of a Weapons Acquisition Permit(Waffenerwerbschein), which must be used within one year from the date of issue. Muzzle- loading handguns are exempted from the permit requirement. [The 1928 law had required a permit for the purchase of long guns as well, but the National Socialists dropped this requirement.]
  • Holders of a permit to carry weapons(Waffenschein) or of a hunting license do not need a Weapons Acquisition Permit in order to acquire a handgun.
  • A hunting license authorizes its bearer to carry hunting weapons and handguns.
  • Firearms and ammunition, as well as swords and knives, may not be sold to minors under the age of 18 years. [The age limit had been 20 years in the 1928 law.]
  • Whoever carries a firearm outside of his dwelling, his place of employment, his place of business, or his fenced property must have on his person a Weapons Permit (Waffenschein). A permit is not required, however, for carrying a firearm for use at a police-approved shooting range.
  • A permit to acquire a handgun or to carry firearms may only be issued to persons whose trustworthiness is not in question and who can show a need for a permit. In particular, a permit may not be issued to:
    1. persons under the age of 18 years;
    2. legally incompetent or mentally retarded persons;
    3. Gypsies or vagabonds;
    4. persons under mandatory police supervision [i.e., on parole] or otherwise temporarily without civil rights;
    5. persons convicted of treason or high treason or known to be engaged in activities hostile to the state;
    6. persons who for assault, trespass, a breach of the peace, resistance to authority, a criminal offense or misdemeanor, or a hunting or fishing violation were legally sentenced to a term of imprisonment of more than two weeks, if three years have not passed since the term of imprisonment.
  • The manufacture, sale, carrying, possession, and import of the following are prohibited:
    1. "trick" firearms, designed so as to conceal their function (e.g., cane guns and belt-buckle pistols);
    2. any firearm equipped with a silencer and any rifle equipped with a spotlight;
    3. cartridges with .22 caliber, hollow-point bullets.
That is the essence. Numerous other provisions of the law relate to firearms manufacturers, importers and dealers; to acquisition and carrying of firearms by police, military and other official personnel; to the maximum fees which can be charged for permits (3 Reichsmark); to tourists bringing firearms into Germany; and to the fines and other penalties to be levied for violations.
The requirements of "trustworthiness" and of proof of need when obtaining a permit are troubling, but it should be noted that they were simply carried over from the 1928 law: they were not formulated by the National Socialists. Under the National Socialists these requirements were interpreted liberally: a person who did not fall into one of the prohibited categories listed above was considered trustworthy, and a statement such as, "I often carry sums of money," was accepted as proof of need.
The prohibitions of spotlight-equipped rifles and hollow-point .22 caliber ammunition were based on considerations that the former were unsporting when used for hunting, and the latter were inhumane.
The German firearms laws were published by the German government in the Reichsgesetzblatt. The most pertinent part of the National Socialist Firearms Law — the part pertaining to the purchase, ownership, and carrying of firearms by private citizens — is Part IV of the Law. Two separate and distinct types of permits are referred to: a Weapons Acquisition Permit(Waffenerwerbschein), required only for purchasing a handgun; and a Weapons Permit (Waffenschein),required for carrying any firearm in public. Interestingly enough, as also mentioned above, a hunting license could take the place of both these permits.
When you [consider the National Socialist law and that which preceded it], you will understand that it was Hitler's enemies, not Hitler, who should be compared with the gun-control advocates in America today. Then as now it was the Jews, not the National Socialists, who wanted the people's right of self-defense restricted. You will understand that those who continue to make the claim that Hitler was a gun-grabber are either ignorant or dishonest.
And you will understand that it was not until 1945, when the Communist and democratic victors of the Second World War had installed occupation governments to rule over the conquered Germans that German citizens were finally and completely denied the right to armed self-defense.

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Donald Trump: Obama Denies Syrian Christians Immigration but welcomes Muslims

This is the most egregious thing I've heard about this administration among the multitude of them! Syrian Christians are being hunted down and beheaded but can't flee to America while Muslims have an open door policy. This is antiChrist! How can this be! Where are the outcries from our "conservative" leaders? I've never heard this brought up before Trump said it on this tape.

I plan to make several phone calls and send several emails about this. Were you aware of it?

Cliff Sims interviews Donald Trump on Yellowhammer Radio - YouTube
Well, the trimmed version I uploaded is not working...I don't know why unless it's because I just upgraded to Windows 10 so click on the link above and catch the whole interview. About half way through he talks about the Syrian Christians--it should make you furious and ashamed at our country!





I trimmed this to start at the Syrian Christian atrocity but the whole interview is worth a listen. The link at the top is the entire interview. I normally enlarge YouTube videos but this is just audio so no need...

Monday, August 24, 2015

Here's What the Obama Family Did on Sunday - You'll HATE This

One big happy family--well, all families have those days--but most don't share the luxury they are accustomed to...

Aw, they had to leave Martha's Vineyard and go back the the horrible living quarters at the White House. I sure would like to be a fly on the wall around them, wonder if the girls will talk about their time in the White House when they get older? I think those that put them in the White House may be a little concerned about that from the looks on their faces.The stories they could tell!!!

Just so you know where I'm coming from I think this is a make believe family. Michelle is a man which means the kids are not biologically part of the family. The family was put together in order for Barack to be installed as POTUS. Barack was a member of the Reverend Wright's Down Low Club which arranged the marriage...

Here's What the Obama Family Did on Sunday - You'll HATE This - The Political Insider1obamas


America’s economy is in bad shape, and the U.S. stock market continues to take massive losses. Americans everywhere are struggling.
But not the Obama family! They spent two weeks in Martha’s Vineyard, spending tens-of-millions of your tax dollars on yet ANOTHER golfing and beach vacation. They stayed at a $12 million “cottage” (which has 7 bedrooms and 9 bathrooms), golfed with Hollywood liberals, and vacationed in style.
cottage
And now, as you can see (above) they are depressed about having to return to Washington, D.C. They couldn’t bother to even crack a smile for the cameras, and look miserable:
President Obama and the first family looked glum when they stepped off Marine One outside of the White House after their summer vacation.
They had been on Martha’s Vineyard for the past two weeks, enjoying their annual summer break – and they seemed far from happy to be home.
En route to the capital on Sunday, they stopped off at Cape Cod to swap their first helicopter for the President’s plane Air Force One, and they managed to smile at crowds on the tarmac. 
But as the family disembarked Air Force One at Andrews Air Force base, before taking another helicopter back to their official residence, the happy faces had vanished.
At the White House, a serious-looking Obama took the hand of his 17-year-old daughter Malia, while his wife and Sasha, 14, followed behind.
Maybe President Obama is disappointed that he had to spend time away from the golf course calling Democrats to support his highly unpopular deal he wants America to cut with the hostile regime of Iran?
Or could the strain of a failed Presidency be a reason why the Obamas might be divorcing after his second term ends?
This family is SO out of touch:
1

6



Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/heres-what-the-obama-family-did-on-sunday-youll-hate-this/#ixzz3jlcizpHr



Friday, August 21, 2015

Jesus Christ Did Exist - The Bodies of the Disciples/Apostles are Buried Around the World Including In India | Hidden Human StoryHidden Human Story

There are many views of the Biblical figure Jesus of Nazareth. He claimed to be the Messiah promised in Old Testament Scriptures; the Son of God. Many believe He is who He claimed, some believe He was a good man but not the Messiah, many believe he was a lunatic, while the most Jews (Talmudic) believe He was a wicked person who is now in hell, literally up to His eyeballs in boiling excrement and semen mixed. Then there are those who say He never existed at all.

What think ye, who do you say He is?

This story is from: http://hiddenhumanstory.com




Jesus Christ Did Exist – The Bodies of the Disciples/Apostles are Buried Around the World Including In India


For those that claim that Jesus Christ didn’t exist, they never seem to have an answer for the bodies and art work showing the “Semite” and “European” looking apostles and other followers that are buried around the world and have churches built over the tombs.  Some even think that Jesus was buried in Kashmir after he settled there after the crucifixion and died in his eighties.  The question of his bloodline is what needs to be looked at.  I believe Jesus Christ was pharaonic and related to the Osirian Pharaohs. The symbolism and the hidden story of Dionysus-Osiris is encoded in the Catholic religion as well as the Bible and this may be why there are remnants similar to that of the tale of Dionysus-Osiris in the story of Jesus Christ.
Too bad, they can’t get DNA samples because it would prove a lot of things, but you notice there are never any comprehensive documentaries about all of these ancient disciples and followers being buried all over India, Europe, and the Middle East.  They won’t even talk about the graves all over the world of the Biblical characters.  Here are some very interesting videos that I found on youtube.  Please look closely at the bodies and/or representation of the bodies:



You can look at this link to find the tombs of the apostles listed.
Here is a list of burial places of Biblical people:
Finally, here is a video regarding Jesus being buried in Kashmir:


Even if he was buried in Kashmir or found to be pharaonic, it would still add up and make sense to me as to who he was and what he was fighting against (Satan-Prometheus and the followers of Satan/bloodline of Satan).

Monday, August 17, 2015

Polish Atrocities Against the German Minority Led to WWII

Under the Treaty of Versailles Germans were forced to live in Czechoslovakia (the Sudetenland) and Poland, where they were horribly treated.

Hitler was quoted as saying "The victor will never be asked if he told the truth". This turned out to be quite a prophecy as the history of WWII is the the most lied about war of all time! Here is just one example. The victor said Hitler invaded Poland for no cause other than he wanted the land.

This is just one of a multitude of lies about the events surrounding WWII, no the victor was never asked if he told the truth!

Edited and published by order of the Foreign Office,
Volk und Reich Verlag Berlin, 2nd. revised ed., 1940, 311 pp.
Volk und Reich Verlag logo

GERMANS: ABUSED MINORITY!
An odd concept you may have never heard of.  But it happened.
Atrocity photos you'll never see on the History Channel.

"Poland wants war with Germany and Germany will not be able to avoid it even if she wants to." (Polish Marshal Rydz-Smigly as reported in the Daily Mail, August 6th, 1939)
For Hitler's viewpoint, see link at bottom.

The historical record, as represented by the German government at the time, on Bromberg "Bloody Sunday" and related incidents -- 58,000 claimed dead or missing by Feb 1940.*  The German invasion was Sep 1939, but it's important to understand that many of the outrages had preceded the German invasion.  This was proved by the amount of decomposition of the bodies.  Thus, these atrocities cannot be excused simply as reprisals for the German invasion (which would be wrong anyway).  They included 19 year-old girls with their faces smashed, amputations, disembowelments, shot thru' the eye, death-trauma births, you name it.  Poles had been merrily slaughtering anything or anybody German since at least as early as April 1939, with smaller incidents stretching back to the close of WW I  -- you haven't been told that by the Mass Media, or the fact that these atrocities were one of the main causes for the German invasion of Poland, something that was meant by the Germans to be a local solution to a local problem.  Germany had already done the "right thing" by protesting in writing to the League of Nations literally dozens of times.  The League of Nations did nothing, yet the problem had to be solved.  [Photo at left:  Polski marshal Rydz-Smigly, burdened with the weight of numerous medals.  As soon as his army started to lose, this bragging Polish "warrior" ran away to Romania,  leaving his troops in a lurch!  Yet to this day, no opprobrium is cast his way by the establishment media.  Why not?]
Subsequent to the German invasion, Britain declared war on Germany, yet after the Soviet Union invaded the eastern Polish territory only a few weeks later, Britain neglected to declare war on the Soviet Union.  Why not, if the integrity of Poland's borders was so important?  Inquiring minds want to know.  After using these incidents as obvious pretext (the real purpose being to take down Germany as an economic rival and arch anti-NWO force), Britain then began bombing the Ruhr Valley the day after Churchill took office (May 10, 1940), specifically targeting civilian areas in addition to industrial and military targets.  The rest is history --  a shameful and gut-wrenching one.
On Bromberg Bloody Sunday, thousands of ethnic Germans were slaughtered like pigs in an alley because the majority "poles" (the "slavic", non-Teutonic types, really Turco-Ugaric, Hunnic, Tartar and Mongoloid residue from the old "Dark Age" invasions) knew they could do so with total impunity.  Marshal Pilsudski had died, and Britain's leaders had made unconditional guarantees to Poland as a pretense to ensure maximum political tensions in Eastern Europe to serve the interests of Soviet Russia.  Poles in official capacity were openly laying claim to ancient German territory, were engaging in the crudest pea-brained saber-rattling, had engaged in border violations and boasted of marching thru' the gates of Berlin in 3 weeks (or days, depending on which buzzing brain was indulging in the fantasy).  Poland had even stolen a chunk of "Czechoslovak" territory (Teschen) in March 1939.
* WHAT ABOUT THE NUMBERS?  Are these numbers exaggerated?  Probably, but not by much, certainly nowhere near as much as the way Poles and Jews exaggerate their numbers of dead.  These historical facts were confirmed by the East-German historian Theodor Bierschenk in 1954, and the Social-Democrat journalist Otto Heike in 1955, on the basis of Polish documents.  There were 12,857 identified dead in the Bromberg area, leaving a large number of unidentified dead there, and many more dead elsewhere.  Both Hoggan (The Forced War) and de Zayas (Wehrmacht War Crimes Bureau) basically agree with these conclusions.
David Hoggan's The Forced War in a PDF (2 MB)
David Hoggan's The Forced War in HTML (4 MB)
*        *        *        *        *

George Soros funds Ferguson protests, hopes to spur civil action - Washington Times

Should George Soros be arrested for inciting riots? He was behind the Ferguson riot--he paid for it! Actually he should be arrested for treason as he has publically stated that he was going to bring America down and he puts his money where his mouth is.

He is using his immense wealth to create division and tension between black and white, cops and the public, rich and poor, latinos and whites, men and women, gay and strait, and any other kind of division he can come up with.

Liberal billionaire gave at least $33 million in one year to groups that emboldened activists
By Kelly Riddell - The Washington Times - Wednesday, January 14, 2015

There’s a solitary man at the financial center of the Ferguson protest movement.

No, it’s not victim Michael Brown or Officer Darren Wilson. It’s not even the Rev. Al Sharpton, despite his ubiquitous campaign on TV and the streets. Rather, it’s liberal billionaire George Soros, who has built a business empire that dominates across the ocean in Europe while forging a political machine powered by nonprofit foundations that impacts American politics and policy, not unlike what he did with MoveOn.org.

This picture is from another news article on the same subject sent me by a friend. 
Mr. Soros spurred the Ferguson protest movement through years of funding and mobilizing groups across the U.S., according to interviews with key players and financial records reviewed by The Washington Times
. 
In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations. The financial tether from Mr. Soros to the activist groups gave rise to a combustible protest movement that transformed a one-day criminal event in Missouri into a 24-hour-a-day national cause celebre.
Full article here:

Sunday, August 16, 2015

Euro TRANNY MIND CONTROL and the NWO LGBT Agenda

Shocking video! How have the people of the West become so stupid?


This should wake you up to the fact that the Christian West is being deliberately destroyed. Societies just don't progress this way naturally, there is a controlling agent behind this. Take a look at the world and see who is behind this, who runs the world, who owns the banks, who owns the media, who is in charge of academia. Don't just look at who is president, as in the US, but look at who put him in power, who are/were his handlers/advisors, who fills his cabinet...

Yes Christianity is under assault and who are the biggest opponents of Christ? All you have to do is look at history. It's the same today as it was while Christ walked on Earth out of Galilee towards Jerusalem. Yes it was the rulers of Jerusalem (now along with the new tribe of  non-Semitic Khazars who converted to Judaism in the 8th century AD) who opposed Him then as they do now! They are out for revenge for 2000 years of wandering but it was God who caused their wandering for their rejection of His Son, not the Christians.

The rulers of Jerusalem in the time of Jesus were not following the religion of Moses but the Talmud referred to by Jesus as the 'traditions of men'. The rulers were, by and large, not even Hebrews but Edomites (Edom is in modern Jewry today - 1906 Jewish encyclopedia.). It's the same today as the Edomites and Khazars (Ashkenazi) follow the Talmud, not the Torah!

They've decided to break His bands and return to the land they were driven from in opposition to His will. Now they want the 'Holy Land' but that's not all, they want the whole world. They are behind the push for a 'new world order' but that's not their objective. The real objective is a Jew world order in which non-Jews are their slaves.