seconds: Million 0.0328 years; Billion 31.7 years; Trillion 31,710 years


Visit USADebtClock.com to learn more!

Friday, April 12, 2013

Immigration part of the Council of Trent? Why politicians embrace illegal immigration…

The Holy Roman Empire didn’t take the reformation lying down, they planned a counter-reformation during the Council of Trent. This was a war joined not only by the catholic church but in league with the European monarchists. 


Wikipedia,: The Counter-Reformation (also the Catholic Revival[1] or Catholic Reformation) was the period of Catholic revival beginning with the Council of Trent (1545–1563) and ending at the close of the Thirty Years' War (1648), which is sometimes considered a response to the Protestant Reformation. The Counter-Reformation was a comprehensive effort composed of four major elements:
    1. Ecclesiastical or structural reconfiguration
    2. Religious orders
    3. Spiritual movements
    4. Political dimensions


The pope’s army for this war was ‘God’s marines’ the Jesuits! I can’t go into detail in this post, there is plenty of research available on the net (search Jesuit on the search box on my blog).

The idea was to stamp out the WASP. To see how effective they’ve been just look at the leaders in every area of our society today. WASP used to dominate, now they are a definite the minority. Look at the supreme court, the congress, the media, Hollywood; Jews and Roman Catholics control everything.

I’ve run across websites that postulate that the Jews joined the catholics in this war. Look at the history of communism, it was started by Jews, and catholic priest almost totally embrace it. That’s another story too…

Back to the war on WASP, the country on our southern border is almost entirely catholic, the more Mexicans that cross the border, the more catholic the nation gets and the less WASP. The pope gains another country, democracy is dealt a death blow so the monarchists are happy, and the Jews, they never had much use for Jesus so they won’t shed any tears at the loss of a Christian nation! Cold hard facts!

Wikipedia Update: Roberts is one of thirteen Catholic justices — out of 111 justices total — in the history of the Supreme Court.[50] Of those thirteen justices, six (Roberts, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Sonia Sotomayor) are currently serving.

THE BIG PUSH: GANG SET TO ROLL OUT IMMIGRATION BILL...
Report: Rubio goes all-in...
Civil Rights Commissioners Warn Amnesty will Hurt Blacks...

Council_Trent-CheckerBoardfloor

Artist rendition of Council of Trent, couldn’t help noticing the checkerboard flooring.

Which came first? Newton parents and children used in media blitz, lobbies congress

Pardon me for thinking how great the Sandy Hook shootings have been for gun control advocates. How do you revive an issue that is dead in the water? The Sandy Hook shootings fell right into the gun grabbers laps, how fortuitous! They should give Adam Lanza a medal.

What if there was a plan for a new world order but the biggest obstacle was a free, armed, America. They’ve been busy whittling away our freedoms but we still have our guns. They’ve got to get the guns before they can fully take away our freedoms!

Is it possible that they would plan this kind of an event in order to change public opinion and thus make it easier to accomplish their goals? This ideology embraces the concept that the end justifies the means. They couldn’t kill millions of babies a year if they didn’t embrace that concept.

If they can rationalize the killing of babies what can’t they rationalize? How did they get the Patriot Act passed? How did they get the DHS created? How did they start the never-ending war on terrorism in which they can define terrorists any way they decide to!

Do you really think 19 Arabs crawled out of their 7th century caves/tents and brought down the twin towers causing an event so infamous as to initiate the building of the new world order?

I mentioned they should give Adam Lanza a medal earlier, I don’t think Adam Lanza ever killed anyone in his life. Adam Lanza was the patsy, the fall guy in the false flag operation carried out at Newton Connecticut in order to build sympathy for the disarming of America and the building of the new world order!

POLL: 65% of women favor stricter gun laws; only 44% of men do...
Obama to Hand Mic to Newtown Victim's Mom for Weekly Radio Address...

NEWTOWN FAMILIES GET HANDLERS: CLINTONITE SHEPHERDS ON TV, HILL...
TV Show 'GLEE' Depicts School Shooting...

DHS to Police: Prepare for economic collapse by end of April

I don’t know how solid this information is but I know that day is coming and I believe sooner rather than later! Look at the economic situation, the unemployment, number of folks on food stamps, national debt, growth rate; 2+2 = 4, arithmetic doesn’t lie!

That’s just the numbers game, add in the fact that they are setting up the new world order in which there is no place for a free America. Open your eyes, look around, you will see it even in the lamestream media how the constitution is being shredded and denigrated!

DHS Advising Local PD’s of General Economic Collapse by the end of April.

Thursday, April 11, 2013 18:01

The source for this was an officer at the briefing. The police department was located in the Midwest and the city has a population of around 300,000.

DHS advised select PD brass that they were expecting a total economic collapse as early as the end of April. They suggested departments stock up on supplies, including that individual officers keep supplies of non-perishable foods should the need arise.

The officer also mentioned that a firearms confiscation protocol would be used and BATFE would assist via dissemination of ATF form 3310.4 data as well other info gathered from gun show surveillance.

The officer was previously clueless to any of this and is basically just your typical PD bureaucrat. He was surprised that these instructions were being issued.

I, however, am not surprised. Even a cursory look at U.S. and world economic data, as well as the fact that a chunk of the world's billionaires are dumpimg blue chip stocks such as P&G, tells me we are toast economically. Looks like DHS is finally getting ready for SHTF day in earnest.

2 guys in a jet catch a chemtrail spray in flight

Lest we forget, I haven’t posted anything on chemtrails lately so here goes…

Thursday, April 11, 2013

UN Agenda 21 & Fusion Center Concepts, -- Fascism by any other name

The left has a way with words, they mask the true nature of their intentions by doublespeak. They intend to fence in humans and let the animals roam. But they do it with nice sounding words like sustainable development…

Agenda 21: Subtle changes in language become the language of change

Agenda 21 June 9, 2012 By: Cari Ray

UN Mandated Wildlands project

UN Mandated Wildlands project Credits: Dr. Michael Coffman

For the progressive left, subtle changes in language become the language of change. Smart growth, open spaces, smart streets, walkable communities, visioning projects, sustainable communities, environmental justice, multi-use dwellings and high density urban development units are all examples of the language of change driven by the environmental movement, a.k.a Agenda 21. These buzzwords are found in the H-GAC’s sites, your city’s planning department and many other places.

J. Gary Lawrence, Advisor to President Clinton’s Council on Sustainable Development, knew the American public would not cooperate with the UN’s environmental agenda if they knew about it.

“Participating in a UN advocated planning process would likely bring out many…who would actively work to defeat any elected official…undertaking Agenda 21.” ~J. Gary Lawrence, The Future of Agenda 21 in the New Millennium

Full article here:

Putting it all together, the Fusion Centers:

Stanford University - The Triple Helix Concept

Sustainable Development - Triple Helix

Agenda 21 - Sustainable Development

Your children shouldn’t belong to you says MSNBC hostess: sounds like Hillary’s village

Why do they (government) want your kids? Head Start, No Child Left Behind, and now, Obama wants the nation's 4 year olds in 'public preschool.

Yea, they’ve done such a great job over the last half century or so, let’s turn our kids over to them even earlier!

The goal of socialism is communism. Vladimir Lenin ... Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted. Vladimir Lenin

 Department of Education “Kids Zone” Features Communist Quote from Mao

This is not a democrat or republican evil, it’s a government evil, both parties are complicit…both parties are evil!

Democrats are wolves in wolves’ clothing, republicans are wolves in sheep's clothing!

MSNBC Host Under Attack for Saying Children Shouldn’t Belong to Parents

Image: MSNBC Host Under Attack for Saying Children Shouldn’t Belong to Parents

MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry.
Tuesday, 09 Apr 2013 06:01 PM By Greg Richter

MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry lit a fuse among critics when she recorded a commercial saying children should belong to their communities, not their families.
In a spot for the network’s “Lean Forward” campaign, the host, who also is a political science professor at Tulane University, said that the notion of children belonging to their parents or families has prevented adequate money from being invested in education.
Special: Should the Supreme Court Legalize Gay Marriage? Vote in Urgent Poll.
“Your kid is yours and totally your responsibility. We haven't had a very collective notion of 'these are our children,'” she says. “So part of it is we have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents, or kids belong to their families, and recognize that kids belong to whole communities.”
That did not sit well with conservative pundits and the public alike.
Radio host Glenn Back called it a “parody of reality so far beyond what we have ever thought as a nation.”
But Rush Limbaugh said it was nothing to be surprised at. The idea is nothing new with the left, he said, but now it can now be expressed without fear of being thought “lunatic” or “extreme.”
“She's not worried that a majority of people are gonna disagree with this,” Limbaugh said. “But this is Marx-Engels, ‘Communist Manifesto.’ The nuclear family has always been under attack by communists, by leftists. The nuclear family — just like religion — must be destroyed, and in its place, ‘the community,’ the collective.”
Latest: Should ObamaCare Be Repealed? Vote in Urgent National Poll
“It's bad enough that ‘Lean Forward’ already sounds like an ad for Mao's Little Red Book, then to have your network's hosts talk about your children being part of the Collective is just spooky,” Media Research Center Director of Media Analysis Tim Graham told Fox News.
Intially, Harris-Perry’s only response was in a short tweet on Monday: “Matthew 5:44.” That’s the verse that urges Christians to love their enemies and pray for those who persecute them.
Today, she tweeted that those who “are *still* tweeting me” about the issue should read her response on MSNBC’s website.
In the article titled “Why caring for children is not just a parent’s job,” Harris-Perry repeatedly notes that the whole community is responsible for the raising of children, not the parents only. In the initial promo she didn’t use the word “only.”
“So those of you who were alarmed by the ad can relax,” Harris-Perry wrote. “I have no designs on taking your children. Please keep your kids!”

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/newswidget/msnbc-children-belong-parents/2013/04/09/id/498656?promo_code=11EFB-1&utm_source=11EFEBefore_Its_News2&utm_medium=nmwidget&utm_campaign=widgetphase1#ixzz2QAGGDMYX
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Christians labeled as ‘extremists’ by Army Reserve presentation

After complaints the Army disassociated itself from the training but the point is, this kind of thinking is out there!

Army Reserve presentation calls Christians ‘extremists’

Military

Soldiers of the U.S. Army 23rd Chemical Battalion

Associated Press/Photo by Lee Jin-man

Soldiers of the U.S. Army 23rd Chemical Battalion

A U.S. Army Reserve training brief on extremism and extremist organizations puts evangelical Christianity at the top of the list of groups soldiers should watch out for, and avoid.

According to the Power Point presentation, obtained and posted online by legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, the Army Reserve in Pennsylvania considers evangelical Christians, Catholics, and Mormons as dangerous as the Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda, and Hamas.

The text accompanying the slide listing “extremist” groups defines extremism as beliefs, attitudes, feelings, and actions far removed from the ordinary:

Because “ordinary” is subjective, no religious group would label itself extreme or its doctrine “extremism.” However, religious extremism is not limited to any single religion, ethnic group, or region of the world; every religion has some followers that believe that their beliefs, customs and traditions are the only “right way” and that all others are practicing their faith the “wrong way,” seeing and believing that their faith/religion superior to all others.

The Archdiocese for the Military Services, which endorses priests to work in the military and at VA Medical Centers, chastised the Army for the presentation in a statement issued Thursday: “The Archdiocese is astounded that Catholics were listed alongside groups that are, by their very mission and nature, violent and extremist.”

The list of groups used in the presentation appears to have come from the Southern Poverty Law Center, an organization that has applied a “hate group” label to Christian organizations based on their beliefs about homosexuality.

According to the archdiocese, the Army Chief of Chaplains office investigated the training module and found it an isolated incident not condoned by the Department of the Army. It urged the military’s commanders to take steps to prevent similar training sessions in the future.

George Wright, an Army spokesman at the Pentagon, confirmed the presentation was produced by an individual without consent from or knowledge of the Army's chain of command. The presentation is more than a year old, Wright said: "After receiving a single complaint following the presentation, this person deleted the slide, and it was never again shown. … This person has apologized for any offense it may have caused, and we consider the matter closed."

In addition to labeling evangelical Protestants and Catholics as extremists, the training module said soldiers were prohibited from supporting “extremist organizations” by attending public rallies and meetings or taking leadership roles in the groups.

Chaplain Ron Crews, a retired colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve and the executive director for the Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty, also condemned the presentation.

“Men and women of faith who have served the Army faithfully for centuries shouldn’t be likened to those who have regularly threatened the peace and security of the United States,” he said in a statement. “It is dishonorable for any U.S. military entity to allow this type of wrongheaded characterization.”

Chinese colonel: SARS, Bird flu virus are U.S. biological weapons

The American Flu

Chinese colonel says latest bird flu virus is U.S. biological weapon

AP

AP BY: Bill Gertz April 9, 2013 6:05 pm

A Chinese Air Force officer on Saturday accused the U.S. government of creating the new strain of bird flu now afflicting parts of China as a biological warfare attack.

People’s Liberation Army Sr. Col. Dai Xu said the United States released the H7N9 bird flu virus into China in an act of biological warfare, according to a posting on his blog on Saturday.

The charge was first reported in the state-run Guangzhou newspaper Southern Metropolis Daily and then picked up by several news outlets in Asia.

State Department spokesman Jason Rebholz dismissed the claim. “There is absolutely no truth to these allegations,” he told the Washington Free Beacon.

Seven deaths from the bird flu outbreak were reported as of Tuesday in state-run Chinese media. As many as 24 people reportedly were infected by the disease in Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Anhui.

Chinese authorities are trying to calm public fears of a major epidemic, claiming there is no evidence the virus can be transmitted between humans.

The government also is claiming that the outbreak is not related to the recent discovery of thousands of dead pigs floating in a river in China.

The accusation of U.S. biological warfare against China comes as the Pentagon is seeking closer military relations with China. Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is set to travel to China for talks with Chinese military leaders later this month.

Dai is a military strategist who in the past has been outspoken in seeking to foment conflict between China and the United States. He told the Global Times in August that China should go to war over U.S. support for Japan’s claims to the disputed Senkaku Islands.

Writing on Sina Weibo, a Chinese microblogging site akin to Twitter, Dai stated that the new bird flu strain was designed as a biological weapon similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), which he also claimed was developed as a U.S. bio-weapon, that affected the country in 2003.

According to Dai’s posting, the new flu outbreak should not be a cause for concern. “The national leadership should not pay too much attention to it,” the PLA lecturer at the National Defense University wrote. “Or else, it’ll be like in 2003 with SARS!”

“At that time, America was fighting in Iraq and feared that China would take advantage of the opportunity to take other actions,” he said. “This is why they used bio-psychological weapons against China. All of China fell into turmoil and that was exactly what the United States wanted. Now, the United States is using the same old trick. China should have learned its lesson and should calmly deal with the problem.”

Dai said that even if “a few may die” from the flu outbreak, it will not equal one-thousandth of the deaths caused by vehicle accidents in China.

Dai in the past has called for China to punish the United States for U.S. arms sales to rival Taiwan, by selling arms to U.S. enemies. “China recognizes that a few perfunctory protests will not have any effect,” Dai said in 2010. “China can’t directly sanction American arms companies since they did not do business with China … but China can sanction companies that are doing business with China directly, like Boeing or General Electric.”

Dai also has said the United States has used crises with North Korea and offers of cooperation on the issue as a plot to drive a wedge between Beijing and its fraternal communist ally.

Dai also has said U.S. efforts to counter Chinese espionage and intelligence-gathering were part of a U.S. “plot theory” of “western countries threatening others by [releasing] information gained through spying in order to damage the reputations of other countries.”

A State Department official said China notified the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 31 about its first detected human cases of H7N9 infection. Fourteen cases were confirmed by the WHO by April 5, of which six were fatal. The organization said there is no evidence of human-to-human transmission.

“U.S. Embassy Beijing and U.S. Consulate Shanghai are monitoring the situation, working closely with counterparts at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, and the Beijing and Shanghai municipal governments,” the official said.

The colonel’s accusation provoked a widespread response on Chinese websites. One post in reaction joked that Dai’s comment about auto deaths must mean that the United States and Germany are responsible for a conspiracy to produce cars, according to a report in Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post.

Luo Changping, deputy editor of Caijing, said most PLA soldiers would not support Dai’s comments and he urged the colonel to resign and apologize to those who have died from the current bird flu outbreak.

A defiant Dai then said in a new posting Sunday that “it is common knowledge that a group of people in China have been injected with mental toxin by the United States.”

“Now, a group of fake American devils are attacking me,” he wrote in another post. “I will not retreat even half a step.”

Analysts say the colonel’s remarks are a reflection of the growing xenophobic atmosphere within the Chinese military that views the United States as its main enemy.

Former State Department intelligence analyst John Tkacik said China’s military was largely to blame for mishandling the 2003 outbreak of SARS. Tkacik said there was speculation when the epidemic began that “the PLA suspects SARS had emanated from its own biological laboratories and was all the more eager to keep it secret.” China is known to have a covert biological arms program.

“Col. Dai Xu is a shameless liar when he accuses the United States of using bio weapons,” Tkacik told the Free Beacon. “He’s probably motivated by a desire to exculpate the PLA for their mishandling of the epidemic—no doubt most Chinese have happily forgotten the episode—as much as by a cynical xenophobia. But, that’s what passes for deep strategic thought at China’s National Defense University these days.”

The Pentagon has been trying with varying success to develop closer ties to the Chinese military as part of a strategy aimed at building trust. However, China’s military leaders believe the U.S. offers of closer ties are a ruse designed to contain China’s growing military buildup.

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel spoke by phone with China’s Defense Minister Gen. Chang Wanquan on April 2. Chang is the No. 4 defense official after Chinese President Xi Jinping and two other generals who run the Central Military Commission, the Communist Party’s ultimate power organ.

“The leaders both expressed their intention to work together to continue to build a military-to-military relationship that serves the vision of both President Obama and President Xi,” Pentagon press secretary George Little said in a statement after the call.

“The secretary discussed the importance of focusing on areas of sustained dialogue, practical areas of cooperation, and risk reducing measures,” he said.

U.S. ties with China are strained due to China’s reluctance to rein in neighboring North Korea.

China provides North Korea with large amounts of fuel oil and other goods. However, Beijing has not taken steps to pressure Pyongyang using its economic leverage during the ongoing crisis.

The flu has lit up China’s thriving Internet, according to analysts. Over 945,600 microblog postings addressed the flu between April 8 and 9. Since the outbreak began some seven days ago, between 1.3 million and 3 million postings were put online on outlets including Sina Weibo and QQ Weibo.

Tens of thousands of users expressed doubts about the official Shanghai municipal government’s denial of any link between the dead pigs found floating last month in the region’s Huangpu River.

The proximity to the initial outbreak in Shanghai and the river has led to speculation that the pig deaths may have been linked to the flu virus jumping from animals to humans.

That speculation was fueled by reports that one of the victims of the flu was a pig butcher.

The avian flu strain is similar to an earlier outbreak with a significant difference: The current strain does not kill the birds it infects, making it more difficult to identify infected poultry.

The Shanghai government waited 20 days before announcing the first H7N9 infection on March 31.

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Biographer admits: There was no Obama family

Everything about Barak Hussein Obama is a lie! I used to think Bill Clinton was the biggest liar I’d ever seen, he makes Clinton look like a Boy Scout by comparison. Lucifer is a liar and the father of lies, and his son is Obama!

Exclusive: Jack Cashill notes Maraniss book puts lie to O's 'improbable love' claim

Jack Cashill

In all the talk about David Maraniss’ new book, “Barack Obama: The Story,” the chattering classes seem to have overlooked the most significant of Maraniss’ revelations, namely that the story on which Obama based his 2008 candidacy is “received myth, not the truth.”

“My parents shared not only an improbable love,” said Obama famously in his 2004 Democratic Convention keynote, “they shared an abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation.” This concept of multicultural romance shaped his persona and his campaigns.

At the 2008 Democratic Convention in Denver, Obama leaped into the story in the very first sentence. “Four years ago,” he began, “I stood before you and told you my story – of the brief union between a young man from Kenya and a young woman from Kansas who weren’t well-off or well-known, but shared a belief that in America, their son could achieve whatever he put his mind to.”

As Maraniss concedes, these two young people shared very close to nothing. “In the college life of Barack Obama in 1961 and 1962,” writes Maraniss, “as recounted by his friends and acquaintances in Honolulu, there was no Ann; there was no baby.”

Although Maraniss talked to many of Obama Sr.’s friends, none of the credible ones ever so much as saw him with Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham.

One Obama friend, a Cambodian named Kiri Tith, knew the senior Obama “very well.” He had also met Ann through a different channel. “But he had no idea,” writes Maraniss, “that Ann knew Obama, let alone got hapai (pregnant) by him, married him, and had a son with him.”

Only Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie claims to have seen the pair together during the presumed courtship stage, but he is not close to credible.

“Maybe I’m the only one in the country,” Abercrombie told the Los Angeles Times in December 2010, “that could look you right in the eye right now and tell you, ‘I was here when that baby was born.’” This was pure lie, no other word for it.

A few days later, Abercrombie clarified to Mark Niesse of the Associated Press that he didn’t exactly see Obama’s parents with their newborn son at the hospital, but that he “remembers seeing Obama as a child with his parents at social events.” Another lie.

Maraniss should have quoted Abercrombie with the stated qualifier that he has proved unreliable on all things Obama, but he did not. Abercrombie was too important. Without Abercrombie, there is no contemporary witness to any kind of relationship. Maraniss, however, knew enough not to quote Abercrombie on his claim to having seen the baby with his parents.

Despite his Herculean digging into the dung of Obama’s life, Maraniss’ shovel comes up empty on the couple’s alleged February 1961 wedding. He footnotes his comments thusly: “Marriage facts recorded in divorce records.”

There is no doubt that both Ann Dunham and Obama claimed a wedding. It suited both their purposes, Obama to extend his visa and Dunham to legitimize her baby with a black husband.

As to the divorce, Dunham at the time was desperately trying to keep her future husband, Lolo Soetoro, in the country. The INS believed her to be married to Obama. Even if she were not married, a divorce would have been useful to clear the way for a marriage to Soetoro.

Like all other biographers of either Obama or his parents, Maraniss is totally silent on Dunham’s whereabouts from the February marriage to the August birth. He adds one detail, however, that deepens the mystery.

According to the birth certificate and the newspaper announcements, the young family lived at 6085 Kalanianole Highway where Dunham’s parents lived. Obama Sr. clarified to the INS that mother and baby lived there without him.

Maraniss definitively states that “[Dunham] and Obama and the infant never lived [at 6085 Kalanianole].” There was no room. The senior Dunhams shared the house with the Pratt family. The Pratt daughter “has no memory of the Dunhams’ daughter bringing an infant home.”

And yes, finally, an Obama biographer admits what the blogosphere has known for the last four years: “Within a month of the day Barry came home from the hospital, he and his mother were long gone from Honolulu, back on the mainland. …”

“This period, Washington State revisited,” Maraniss writes, “is missing from the memoir the son would write decades later.” In fact, as recently as Father’s Day 2012, Obama was claiming that his father left home when he was 2.

What Maraniss does not say is that he missed the Seattle hegira story himself in the 10,000-word Washington Post article he wrote on the eve of the 2008 election.

He was hardly unique. No one in the mainstream media wanted to blow the whistle on the fraudulent family fable that got Obama elected president.

The New Yorker’s David Remnick chose to overlook it in his 2010 Obama bio. The New York Times’ Janny Scott overlooked it in her 2011 bio of Obama’s mother. The Boston Globe’s Sally Jacobs overlooked it in her 2011 bio of Obama’s father, and the Times’s Jodi Kantor overlooked it in her 2012 book on the whole extended family.

Worse, conservative writer Dinesh D’Souza chose not to report the fraud in his disingenuous best-seller, “The Roots of Obama’s Rage.” As D’Souza explains, Obama was “his father’s son.” Dunham served largely as the vehicle through which the absent Obama exercised his will on the young Obama, she being “Obama Sr.’s first convert” to anti-colonialism.

D’Souza should have known this was nonsense. Conservative writer Michael Patrick Leahy had broken the Seattle story as early as 2008 in his book, “What Does Barack Believe.” It was accepted knowledge in the conservative blogosphere by 2009.

What Maraniss has laid bare, perhaps without meaning to, is a journalistic scandal of historic proportions in which, alas, he himself has played a part.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/biographer-admits-there-was-no-obama-family/#cdSZCZF9r3MXKTAZ.99

Bill Ayers confirms what Obama has denied

According to Bill Ayers, yes, Obama did launch his political career in the living Room of Bill Ayers, one of the myriad of questions the media never pursued. Why not, because Obama was the ‘chosen one’!

You do remember the occasion in which Obama had the media on his campaign plane but he never showed but sneaked away to a secret meeting. We later learned that both he and Hillary had secretly attended the Bilderberg meeting. After that meeting everything swung Obama’s way—they had chosen him, not her.

Weatherman domestic terrorist finally spills the beans

Aaron Klein

120409ayers

Weatherman domestic terrorist Bill Ayers is now confirming what the White House has previously denied – that he held a fundraiser in his living room for Barack Obama.

That 1995 meeting was said to have launched Obama’s political career.

In an October 2008 interview on MSNBC host Chris Matthews’ show, Robert Gibbs, a spokesman for Obama’s presidential campaign, categorically denied the fundraiser was ever held.

Matthews asked Gibbs: “Did [Ayers] have a fundraiser for [Obama], or not?”

Gibbs, who would become the White House spokesman, replied: “No, he did not have a fundraiser for our candidate as he said ten seconds ago.”

However, in an interview last week with the Daily Beast, Ayers recalled that fundraiser.

Stated Ayers of his relationship with Obama: “We were friendly, that was true; we served on a couple of boards together, that was true; he held a fundraiser in our living room, that was true; Michelle [Obama] and Bernardine were at the law firm together, that was true. Hyde Park in Chicago is a tiny neighborhood, so when he said I was ‘a guy around the neighborhood,’ that was true.”

Does this explain infamous Ayers living-room meeting?

Is the socialist-oriented New Party the missing link at the center of that now infamous 1995 Obama fundraiser in Ayers living room in Chicago?

It was at that meeting that New Party member Alice Palmer announced she wanted Obama as her successor as state senator since she was stepping down to run for Congress.

WND has found that in the July 1996 edition of the New Party’s newsletter, the New Party news, the controversial party announced “the Illinois New Party capped off a month-long house party drive in Chicago.”

Further review of New Party literature from 1995 and 1996 finds that so-called house parties were regularly utilized by the New Party to introduce candidates to leading party activists as well as to raise money and recruit new members.

It is known that single-payer activist Quentin Young, who advised Obama on healthcare when the politician was a state senator, was present at the parlor meeting at the Ayers’ residence.

WND reported that Young was listed by the New Party as an early party founder and builder.

“I can remember being one of a small group of people who came to Bill Ayers’ house to learn that Alice Palmer was stepping down from the senate and running for Congress,” Young was quoted as saying. “[Palmer] identified [Obama] as her successor.”

Chicago-based blogger Maria Warren was also present. She wrote that she remembered watching Obama give a “standard, innocuous little talk” in the Ayers’ home.

“They were launching him,” Warren wrote, “introducing him to the Hyde Park community as the best thing since sliced bread.”

It would make sense that the New Party sponsored the get-together in Ayers’ living room for Palmer’s announcement.

Palmer was the New Party’s signed candidate for office. The New Party, which had partnered closely with ACORN, was mobilizing support for Palmer among its constituents and the larger Chicago progressive community.

New Party founder and Marxist activist Carl Davidson recalled screening Palmer and signing her up to the party.

Wrote Davidson:

In the next two elections in the city … the New Party has taken a slightly different approach. It organized a citywide candidates forum and invited a number of progressive candidates. Of those responding, two were of special interest, Alice Palmer and Willie Delgado … Both Palmer and Delgado attended the [New Party] forum and were thoroughly questioned by 70 or so New Party members. At the close, both publicly signed a “contract” with the New Party … Two weeks later, the New Party formally endorsed them and is now mobilizing support.

How was the New Party mobilizing the stated support for Palmer at the time, an effort that Palmer wanted transferred to Obama?

WND reported the New Party had such a close relationship with ACORN that at one point the two shared an office address, fax lines and email addresses.

ACORN led the New Party’s mobilization and voter drive efforts. In progressive circles at the time, the New Party was considered the de facto political wing of ACORN, a group with which Obama long maintained a close relationship.

Ayers and Dohrn, meanwhile, traveled in the same political circles as New Party leaders, making it even more likely the duo could have hosted a New Party house meeting. The duo were key supporters of Palmer.

In 1994 Dohrn and Bill Ayers were listed on a “Membership, Subscription and Mailing List” for the Chicago Committees of Correspondence, which was co-chaired by New Party founder Davidson.

WND found that Chicago activists Joe Iosbaker and Stephanie Weiner were also listed as New Party leaders.

Iosbaker is a University of Illinois-Chicago office worker and a union steward for his SEIU local. His home was raided by the FBI in September 2010 reportedly as part of a terror probe investigating material support for jihadist groups.

Together with other activists raided in the same probe, Iosbaker and Weiner are founders of the so-called Committee to Stop FBI Repression, which protested the FBI raids.

Another founder of the committee whose home was part of the same raid is Hatem Abudayyeh, the executive director of the Arab American Action Network, or AAAN.

WND was first to report that Obama, while serving as a paid director of the far-left nonprofit Chicago Woods Fund, provided two grants to the AAAN. Obama served at the Woods Fund alongside Ayers.

AAAN was founded by a longtime Obama associate, Columbia University Professor Rashid Khalidi. Khalidi’s wife, Mona, is president of the Arab American Action Network.

The New Party, meanwhile, is coming under increased scrutiny after new information emerged further indicating Obama was a member of the party in the 1990s.

The New Party was a 1990s party that sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

In 2008, Obama’s campaign denied the president was ever a member amid reports, including from WND, citing the New Party’s own literature listing Obama as a member.

Information uncovered in recent weeks, including Obama’s signed contract with the New Party, further establishes the president’s membership with the controversial organization.

Socialist goals

The New Party, established in 1992, took advantage of what was known as electoral “fusion,” which enabled candidates to run on two tickets simultaneously, attracting voters from both parties. But the New Party disbanded in 1998, one year after fusion was halted by the Supreme Court.

The socialist-oriented goals of the New Party were enumerated on its old website.

Among the New Party’s stated objectives were “full employment, a shorter work week and a guaranteed minimum income for all adults; a universal ‘social wage’ to include such basic benefits as health care, child care, vacation time and lifelong access to education and training; a systematic phase-in of comparable worth; and like programs to ensure gender equity.”

The New Party stated it also sought “the democratization of our banking and financial system – including popular election of those charged with public stewardship of our banking system, worker-owner control over their pension assets [and] community-controlled alternative financial institutions.”

Many of the New Party’s founding members were Democratic Socialists of America leaders and members of Committees of Correspondence, a breakaway of the Communist Party USA.

Last month, WND reported on a 1996 print advertisement in a local Chicago newspaper that shows Obama was the speaker at an event sponsored and presented by the Democratic Socialists of America, the DSA.

WND first reported on the event in 2010.

Obama listed as New Party member

In 2009, WND reported on newspaper evidence from the New Party’s own literature listing several new members of the New Party, including Obama.

Earlier this month, Kurtz, writing at National Review Online, reported Obama signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.

In 2008, Obama’s Fight the Smears campaign website quoted Carol Harwell, who managed Obama’s 1996 campaign for the Illinois Senate, as stating: “Barack did not solicit or seek the New Party endorsement for state senator in 1995.”

Fight the Smears conceded the New Party did support Obama in 1996 but denied that Obama had ever joined.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/bill-ayers-confirms-what-obama-has-denied/#lQpKIq5WFrGVo33a.99