Pages

Sunday, December 27, 2020

Q: Who is behind the 'New World Order'? A: "Judaism is Masonry, and Masonry is Judaism." (The Jewish Chronicle)

Klaus Schwab Chairman of the World Economic Forum proponent of 'The Great Reset' aka 'NWO'

Note the occult symbology!
 Consider the words of Jesus, John and Paul before you start calling this antisemitic:

Jesus in Matthew 23: Jesus refers to the scribes and Pharisees as hypocrites, fools, blind, serpents, and generation of vipers

The Apostle John in Revelation 3:9:  …the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie…

The Apostle Paul in Romans 9:  For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel

The 'Alta Vendita' and 'The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' should give you a clue! If you are thinking communism; communism was created by Jews.

Judaism (Talmud and Kabbala) was not the religion of the ancient Hebrews. It came out of the Babylonian captivity! The terms Jew was used prior to the Babylonian captivity but in 1775 according to Benjamin H. Freedman. This has nothing to do with the Hebrews aka the children of Israel but with the 'Synagogue of Satan', the ones Jesus referred to as vipers and sons of the devil and the non-Semitic Ashkenazi Jews from the ancient Khazar empire.

According to Jewish-born Historian Benjamin H. Freedman, author of Facts Are Facts:

“The best known 18th century editions of the New Testament in English are the Rheims (Douai) Edition and the King James Authorized Edition. The Rheims (Douai) translation of the New Testament into English was first printed in 1582 but the word ‘Jew’ did not appear in it.

“The King James Authorized translation of the New Testament into English was begun in 1604 and first published in 1611. The word ‘Jew’ did not appear in it either. The word ‘Jew’ appeared in both these well known editions in their 18th century revised versions for the first times.

“When the word ‘Jew’ was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was ‘Judean’. However, during the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries a well-organized and well-financed international “pressure group” created a so-called ‘secondary meaning’ for the word ‘Jew’ among the English-speaking peoples of the world. This so-called ‘secondary meaning’ for the word ‘Jew’ bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word ‘Jew’. It is a misrepresentation.

“The present generally accepted secondary meaning of the word ‘Jew’ is fundamentally responsible for the confusion in the minds of Christians regarding elementary tenets of the Christian faith. It is likewise responsible today to a very great extent for the dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith.

 

    Insert From "How the Ashkenazi Jews Conquered the West":Jewish-born historian Benjamin H. Freedman explained it thus:

    “When the word ‘Jew’ was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was ‘Judean’. During the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries a well-organized and well-financed international ‘pressure group’ created a so-called ‘secondary meaning’ for the word ‘Jew’ among the English-speaking peoples of the world. This so-called ‘secondary meaning’ for the word ‘Jew’ bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word ‘Jew’. It is a misrepresentation.”

    As it stands, the adherents of Pharisaism or Rabbinists not only hijacked the word Judaism, but they also misappropriated the word Jew. However – over time and as it pertains to Christianity – the word Jew was completely hollowed out of its “Judean” or “Judahite” meaning because those who hijacked it were not of the tribe of Judah. In fact, in many Christian circles today, that word causes quite the confusion.

    Again, here’s historian Benjamin Freedman:

    “The present generally accepted ‘secondary meaning’ of the word ‘Jew’ is fundamentally responsible for the confusion in the minds of Christians regarding elementary tenets of the Christian faith. It is likewise responsible today to a very great extent for the dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the word ‘Jew’ today, to the preponderant majority of intelligent and informed Christians, is contradictory and in complete conflict with incontestable historic fact. Christians who cannot be fooled any longer are suspect of the Christian clergy who continue to repeat, and repeat, and repeat ad nauseam their pet theme song ‘Jesus was a Jew’. It actually now approaches a psychosis.

"Judaism is Masonry, and Masonry is Judaism." - Stormfront




Companions of the Provincial Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons of Buckinghamshire
website

"there is not, nor can there be, any objection to Jewish Brethren rising to the highest offices, either in Craft or Royal Arch Masonry ; it has been ever universally admitted by the order, in fact, to use a well known axiom amongst us, "Judaism is Masonry, and Masonry is Judaism."
- Letter to the Editor, by 'Z', Past Master, The Jewish Chronicle (London), December 20, 1867, p.7.
 

 An Inconvenient History - Probably Alexandria


 

 
 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment