Pages

Monday, May 16, 2011

Update: Affidavit Filed with Louisiana Court Declares Obama “Birth Certificate” a Forgery

It’s looking more and more like Trump was part of a strategy to get rid of the birth certificate story. Obama needed a reason to produce it after refusing to for so long.

It looks like the plan was to have Trump dog him about it and force his hand the same weekend that the Royal Wedding and the Osama story would consume all the news and bury the birth certificate story.

BUT WILL THE JUDGE HAVE THE COURAGE TO ADDRESS IT?

Is this man an empty suit?

(May 12, 2011) — A document which has become part of a lawsuit filed by offshore oil-drilling companies states unequivocally that the image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 purported to be a certified copy of Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate is a forgery.

The affidavits and accompanying exhibits are part of a Motion to Intervene in the Hornbeck v. Salazar lawsuit filed by attorney and dentist Orly Taitz. The government defendants have opposed her Motion. Taitz’s response to the government’s opposition includes her allegation that Barack Hussein Obama is using a fraudulent social security number and is not eligible to occupy the office of president. She also alleges that Department of the Interior Ken Salazar is ineligible because he was appointed by Obama.

The analyst, Douglas B. Vogt, agreed with three other analysts whose reports have been published in recent days at The Post & Email in regard to the presence of multiple layers in the image. Vogt has described a superimposition of text as a “cut and past [sic] job” (page 4 of 21). He contends that the operation to create the image involved more than one person and amounted to “a conspiracy to defraud the United States” (page 5 of 21).

The document was notarized on May 10, 2011, in the state of Washington (page 6 of 21).

A second affidavit from the state of Florida by a different analyst states:

I observed that the birth certificate pdf file could be opened with Adobe Illustrator and the software revealed that this document has many layers of images on it. This indicates that the document was not a true copy of the original birth certificate, but a recently created document using Adobe Illustrator.

On January 20, 2011, a former Hawaii Elections Office supervisor, Tim Adams, signed an affidavit stating that his supervisors had declared that it was “common knowledge,” at least within the Elections Office, that when Obama ran for president there was no original birth record on file at the Hawaii Department of Health or anywhere in the state. Although Dr. Chiyome Fukino and former Governor Linda Lingle had insisted that original birth records were kept on file with the Health Department, the department’s own Communications Director, Janice Okubo, had refused to corroborate their statements. On July 27, 2009, Fukino had gone so far as to declare Obama “a natural-born American citizen,” although no one at the former attorney general’s office would corroborate that statement.

Also in January, the present governor, Neil Abercrombie, had set out to find Obama’s original birth record and then stated publicly that one did not exist. Last month, current Health Director Loretta Fuddy stated in a letter that Obama’s attorney, Judith Corley, could obtain two certified copies of Obama’s original birth record on his behalf shortly before the April 27, 2011 presentation on national television of the image purportedly retrieved from her department.

The U.S. State Department has refused to release the travel records of Stanley Ann Dunham prior to 1965 as well as any travel information on Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro.

Did officials in Hawaii conspire to provide a cover for Obama’s foreign birth? If so, what were they promised in return?

If there was a conspiracy to violate the U.S. Constitution and put Obama in the White House, how many people are involved?

In 2006, Sarah P. Herlihy, an attorney working at a Chicago law firm with ties to Obama, posited that a foreign-born president could serve the United States just as well as a “natural born” one, and that the “natural born” requirement of Article II, Section 1 was “divisive” and “discriminatory” (page 279 of text).

Herlihy also wrote:

Although it seems unlikely and has even been called ludicrous that a foreign power would conspire to place someone with foreign allegiances in the White House, some Americans more legitimately fear that a naturalized citizen will somehow try to change America by promoting his own culture to the exclusion of others. For example, a foreign-born president could soften immigration policies towards immigrants coming from his “home” country, or allow his previous ties to a different country to influence foreign policy decisions such as whether to attack another country, when to issue economic sanctions against that country, or even to provide that country with American aid. Although these concerns may appear reasonable, this argument fails to recognize that a person seeking to become president will face intense public scrutiny during the election process, making it doubtful that anyone would be able to come to the presidency with a hidden agenda regarding a foreign country.

Since entering the White House, Obama has spent $23,000,000 of taxpayer money to encourage Kenyans to adopt a new constitution which legalized abortion for the first time. He has hosted Iftar dinners to celebrate Ramadan and hesitated when our military has had Muslim terrorists in its sights.

In January 2009, Obama signed a presidential determination appropriating more than$20,000,000 to Palestinian refugees in order to establish an “Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs, including by contributions to international, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and payment of administrative expenses of Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department of State, related to humanitarian needs of Palestinian refugees and conflict victims in Gaza.”

Many sources from around the world have reported that Obama was born in Kenya, and a criminal investigation has been launched regarding missing birth records from the early 1960s from the Coast Province Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya about which the U.S. Ambassador to Kenya was apprised in 2008. The ambassador to the United States from Kenya, Peter Ogego, affirmed Obama’s Kenyan birth in November 2008, stating that his birthplace was “already an attraction.”

Obama’s first phone call after taking office was to Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority.

Obama’s step aunt, Zeituni Onyango, has been allowed to remain in the United States despite her illegal immigrant status for many years, during which she received public benefits while living in Boston, MA. Onyango stated that she is entitled to U.S. citizenship despite her violations of U.S. immigration law.

With a British father, Obama was at best born a dual citizen, which could have been enough to disqualify him from the presidency.

Could this be why John Jay, who became the first U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice, suggested during the drafting of the section of the Constitution dealing with presidential eligibility:

Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expresly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.

Update, May 12, 2011: Dr. Taitz’s Motion to Intervene has reportedly been denied.

No comments:

Post a Comment