Pages
Wednesday, June 30, 2021
Sunday, June 27, 2021
Pagan Jewish Lag B'Omer and How Rabbi Akiva's False Messiah Split Christian Jews from the synagogues
People up and down the country of Israel will light bonfires to celebrate “Lag B’Omer” – the 33rd day of the Counting of the Omer. The air will sizzle with sparks and families will gather around a fire with friends, while religious Orthodox Jewish people will flock to a place called Meron for the celebration to be by the graves of famous rabbis – some believe by stretching out on their graves they can somehow absorb some of the rabbi’s spirit.
This is not a Biblical holiday. In fact it is quite the opposite.
TWISTING GOD’S STORY
The counting of days between Passover and Pentecost (the Feast of Weeks) is supposed to be a time of eager anticipation. Here is the original intention of the time of counting the Omer in the Bible:
You shall count for yourselves – from the day after the Shabbat, from the day when you bring the Omer of the waving – seven Shabbats, they shall be complete. Until the day after the seventh sabbath you shall count, fifty days. (Leviticus 23:15-16)
You shall count for yourselves seven weeks, from when the sickle is first put to the standing crop shall you begin counting seven weeks. Then you will observe the Festival of Shavu’ot for the LORD, your God. (Deuteronomy 16:9-10)
An “omer” of grain was brought each day, a blessing was given, and the days counted down to Pentecost or Shavuot. This is where the expression “counting the omer” comes from. The word Pentecost comes from the number 50, because they had to count 50 days from the Passover festival to the feast of Shavuot, the Feast of Weeks. God’s desire was to help his people connect the two feasts in their minds and to count down to the Feast of Weeks; the time of celebrating first fruits. As we know now, Passover foreshadowed the redeeming work of Yeshua at Calvary, and Pentecost foreshadowed the phenomenal pouring out of the Holy Spirit.
But Lag B’Omer interrupts this countdown to focus on other things entirely.
WHAT IS “LAG B’OMER?”
During this time of counting the days between Passover and Pentecost some events transpired in Jewish history back in the late first century and early second century after Yeshua which gave rise to this tradition… but it flies in the face of God’s intentions for his people.
The “Lag” is better represented as just two letters – L and G. Together they mean the number 33 because L means 30 and G stands for 3. It’s the 33rd day of the time when God commands 50 days to be counted from Passover to Pentecost, the Feast of Weeks.
Up until the 33rd day of the 50 day Omer countdown, rabbinic Jewish tradition imposes a time of mourning, forbidding feasting, weddings, and celebrations… and haircuts as well. But the scissors come out on the 33rd day of the Omer, the ‘LG’ of the Omer, which is a time for celebration. There are different reasons for celebrating according to different traditions, but the two main stories are as follows:
THE STORY OF RABBI AKIVA AND HIS FALSE MESSIAH
After Passover one year in the early second century, Rabbi Akiva’s disciples were struck by a plague and 24,000 of them died. However, on the 33rd day of the Omer, the plague was apparently brought to a miraculous halt. This is one of the reasons for the celebrations. It should be noted that Rabbi Akiva had hailed Simon Bar Kochbar as the Messiah. Akiva’s disciples and all patriotic Israelites were expected to rally behind Bar Kochbar’s plans to liberate the Israel from the Roman oppression, and support him as the promised Messiah. This obviously created problems for the disciples of Yeshua, who could not support this false Messiah claim. Their refusal was seen as betrayal of the Jewish people and cut a deep ravine between those who followed Yeshua and the Jewish majority who followed the other rabbis in the other direction. Today the bonfires are often seen as marking a time of heroism and nationalistic pride, but it’s pride in human rebellion, not in God’s victorious provision. As HaAretz Israeli news site says dryly, “Here are the results: About 580,000 Jews were killed, 950 communities were destroyed. We embarked on a 2,000-year exile.”1 Not really a cause for celebration.
Sadly, because nobody wants to suggest that Rabbi Akiva’s words are fallible, and that he made a big mistake in naming Bar Kochbar the messiah, many Jewish people would say that Bar Kochbar was ‘a’ messiah, but that he was unable to reach his full potential. It has twisted people’s ideas of who the promised Messiah should be, and driven a wedge between “patriotic” Jews who followed this false messiah, and wrongly labelled those who followed the true Messiah as ‘traitors’.
THE STORY OF RABBI SIMON BAR YOCHAI AND HIS “DEEP SECRETS”
The other story is that of Rabbi Shimeon Bar Yochai who, it is said, passed on the deep secrets of Kabalah on the day that he died, in the form of the Zohar – the source texts of Jewish mysticism. He didn’t want his death to be a sad day, but wanted people to rejoice and celebrate with light. To this day, thousands of Orthodox devotees go to worship at his grave for Lag B’Omer, to remember this Rabbi and celebrate the giving of the Zohar. Worshiping by graves, it should be added, is very much contrary to what Yeshua stood for, and is an abomination to God (Isaiah 65:4). The Zohar itself contains dark mysticism, tinged with the occult.
Neither of these two events are causes for celebration for those who love Yeshua. They are false hopes full of deceit that are leading Jewish people astray. Human warriors cannot redeem, and occultic mysticism is dangerous fire to play with.
This passage in Jeremiah 9:1-3 breaks my heart as I see God’s sorrow for the deceit and lies that his people are living in:
Oh that my head were waters, and my eyes a fountain of tears, that I might weep day and night for the slain of the daughter of my people!… Falsehood and not truth has grown strong in the land; for they proceed from evil to evil, and they do not know me, declares the Lord.
Please pray earnestly for the people of Israel to see through empty lies and false promises, and to hunger and thirst after the real God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and his TRUE Messiah. We worship a God who is not the God of the dead but of the LIVING! Please pray in these days leading up to Pentecost, the Feast of Weeks, that God would pour out his Spirit of truth and revelation on this land and on his people.
Saturday, June 19, 2021
Friday, June 18, 2021
Marxism Relied on the New 'Scientism''; The Story of Cannibal Island
Marxism, communism, socialism, progressivism, liberalism are different names for the same devil's 'fools gold'!
Thursday, June 17, 2021
The Results of 'Trauma-Based Mind Contro'l: Fight Breaks Out At Ace Hardware, Allegedly Over Masks
Wednesday, June 16, 2021
Judge Dismisses Nurses "Vaccine Rights" Case
Flat Earth Banned BBC Documentary & Secret Expeditions Part 3
Flat Earth Banned BBC Documentary & Secret Expeditions Part 2
Flat Earth - Secret Expeditions & Banned BBC Documentary Part 1
Forced Vaccination Law in Denmark Abandoned After Public Protests – Summit News
How's that 'Defund the Police' thing working out? Check out the stats!
Tuesday, June 15, 2021
THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION: Protocol 1 With Notes
Yes, it's a difficult read, much like the King James Bible, because of the archaic language but it's even more difficult that the KJV. So, I added some notes and highlighted some text with italics.
When 'The Protocols' were released the Jews immediately attacked it as an anti-Semitic smear not for it's veracity. How could they? It's just as true in today's world as it was in Henry Ford's days!
"The Protocols: Ruled a Forgery but it was actually a plagiarization". The German edition of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, was declared a forgery by a court in Bern, Switzerland on May 31, 1935. Whether it was written by Russians (who camouflaged it as Jewish) and is a Russian plot or by Jews and is a Jewish plot the plot has been unfolding for over a century in startling detail. Nostradamus would be green with envy!
The plagurization charge is that much of the language was taken from Niccolò Machiavelli, who is much speculated to have been a crypto-Jew. No surprise here as the thought about rulers are very similar. The charge is a 'red herring'. More here
More hereWORLD CONQUEST THROUGH WORLD JEWISH GOVERNMENT
THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS
OF ZION
My notes are in bold type:
Hitler was a Boy
Scout compared to them! Some say he was one of them, playing his part!
PROTOCOL No. 1
1.Putting aside fine phrases we shall speak of the
significance of each thought: by comparisons and deductions we shall throw
light upon surrounding facts.
2. What I am about to set forth, then, is our system from
the two points of view, that of ourselves and that of the GOYIM [i.e., non-Jews]
3. It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in
number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are
attained by violence and terrorisation, and not by academic discussions. Every
man aims at power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could,
and rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare
of all for the sake of securing their own welfare.
The modern State of
Israel was born of terrorism (‘Irgun’ and ‘Haganah’ King David Hotel bombing).
Do you know now who's behind the 'war on terror'? Keep reading, you will know!
4. What has restrained the beasts of prey who are called
men? What has served for their guidance hitherto?
5. In the beginnings of the structure of society, they were
subjected to brutal and blind force; afterwards - to Law, which is the same
force, only disguised. I draw the conclusion that by the law of nature, right
lies in force.
Might makes right!
6. Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea
one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the
people to one's party for the purpose of crushing another who is in
authority. This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself been
infected with the idea of freedom, SO-CALLED LIBERALISM, and, for the sake of
an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is precisely here that the
triumph of our theory appears; the slackened reins of government are
immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand,
because the blind might of the nation cannot for one single day exist without
guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the old already
weakened by liberalism.
Liberalism is fools
gold by which they will destroy the nations.
GOLD
How did the Jews
become the ‘money masters’ of the world? The Christian nations actually tried to follow the Bible’s
teachings. One of those teachings was against usury aka interest. The kings of
the Christians would employ a ‘court Jew’ to handle the realms finances because
the Jew had no such compunction about usury. They would loan the king’s money
on interest!
7. In our day the power which has replaced that of the
rulers who were liberal is the power of Gold. Time was when Faith ruled. The
idea of freedom is impossible of realization because no one knows how to use it
with moderation. It is enough to hand over a people to self-government for a
certain length of time for that people to be turned into a disorganized mob.
From that moment on we get internecine strife which soon develops into battles
between classes, in the midst of which States burn down and their importance is
reduced to that of a heap of ashes.
The Rothschild's
Luciferian bankster cartel—but it started way before the Rothschilds
8. Whether a State exhausts itself in its own convulsions,
whether its internal discord brings it under the power of external foes - in
any case it can be accounted irretrievably lost: IT IS IN OUR POWER. The
despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our hands, reaches out to it a straw
that the State, willy-nilly, must take hold of: if not - it goes to the bottom.
Rothschild, I care
not who makes the laws Soros bragged
about collapsing nations economies.
9. Should anyone of a liberal mind say that such reflections
as the above are immoral, I would put the following questions: If every State
has two foes and if in regard to the external foe it is allowed and not
considered immoral to use every manner and art of conflict, as for example to
keep the enemy in ignorance of plans of attack and defense, to attack him by
night or in superior numbers, then in what way can the same means in regard to
a worse foe, the destroyer of the structure of society and the commonweal, be
called immoral and not permissible?
They rationalize
about the rightness of their actions thereby proving that down deep inside they
know they are wrong.
10. Is it possible for any sound logical mind to hope with
any success to guide crowds by the aid of reasonable counsels and arguments,
when any objection or contradiction, senseless though it may be, can be made
and when such objection may find more favor with the people, whose powers of
reasoning are superficial? Men in masses and the men of the masses, being
guided solely by petty passions, paltry beliefs, traditions and sentimental
theorems, fall a prey to party dissension, which hinders any kind of agreement
even on the basis of a perfectly reasonable argument. Every resolution of a
crowd depends upon a chance or packed majority, which, in its ignorance of political secrets, puts forth some
ridiculous resolution that lays in the administration a seed of anarchy.
They claim for
themselves some superior occult knowledge.
11. The political has nothing in common with the moral. The
ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is
therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have recourse both
to cunning and to make-believe. Great
national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they
bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than
the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms
of the GOYIM, but we must in no wise be guided by them.
They claim the right
to lie as rulers, in fact, they scoff at the idea of honesty. Also, make note
of the phrase ‘make-believe’; it is a chief stratagem for them.
RIGHT IS MIGHT
12. Our right lies in force. The word "right" is
an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me
what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than
you.
13. Where does right begin? Where does it end?
14. In any State in which there is a bad organization of
authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have lost their
personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying out of liberalism, I find
a new right - to attack by the right of the strong, and to scatter to the winds
all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions
and to become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights of
their power by laying them down voluntarily in their liberalism.
15. Our power in the present tottering condition of all
forms of power will be more invincible than any other, because it will remain
invisible until the moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning can
any longer undermine it.
Professor Carroll
Quigley (Bill Clinton’s mentor) authored the book ‘Tragedy and Hope’ which was
the first open publication allowed to be circulated about the shadowy elite’s
plans for a one world government; Rockefeller thanks media for not reporting on
the group’s plotting for world governance; Rockefeller pleads guilty to the
charge of working towards a one world government; GHW Bush was the first world leader to talk openly
about forming a ‘new world order’!
16. Out of the temporary evil
we are now compelled to commit will emerge the good of an unshakable rule,
which will restore the regular course of the machinery of the national life,
brought to naught by liberalism. The result justifies the means. Let us,
however, in our plans, direct our attention not so much to what is good and
moral as to what is necessary and useful.
The end justifies the
means
17. Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically
the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the
labor of many centuries brought to naught.
The Illuminati was
born on May 1, 1776, the plan is at least that old and probably older. It's
probably as old as the Garden of Eden or as Nimrod's Tower, or as Solomon’s
Temple.
18. In order to elaborate satisfactory forms of action it is
necessary to have regard to the rascality, the slackness, the instability of
the mob, its lack of capacity to understand and respect the conditions of its
own life, or its own welfare. It must be understood that the might of a mob is
blind, senseless and un-reasoning force ever at the mercy of a suggestion from
any side. The blind cannot lead the blind without bringing them into the abyss;
consequently, members of the mob, upstarts from the people even though they
should be as a genius for wisdom, yet having no understanding of the political,
cannot come forward as leaders of the mob without bringing the whole nation to
ruin.
Democracy too is fool’s
gold! A democratic republic is better but alas, we are seeing its demise right
before our eyes!
The American
democratic republic is the exception in that she was born under the Rule of Christ;
as long as America followed Christ she would avoid the abyss. America was good
because her people followed Christ. They (learned elders of Zion) have to a
large extent led the nation away from Christ and because of that is in extreme
danger today. A democracy can only prosper when it's people are good.
19. Only one trained from childhood for independent rule can
have understanding of the words that can be made up of the political alphabet.
Politics is an art
and it is a hidden one; only open to those chosen. They are unmatched in their
zeal, one could say supernaturally. This is how a population so few can affect
the world in such enormity.
20. A people left to itself, i.e., to upstarts from its
midst, brings itself to ruin by party dissensions excited by the pursuit of
power and honors and the disorders arising therefrom. Is it possible for the
masses of the people calmly and without petty jealousies to form judgment, to
deal with the affairs of the country, which cannot be mixed up with personal
interest? Can they defend themselves from an external foe? It is unthinkable;
for a plan broken up into as many parts as there are heads in the mob, loses
all homogeneity, and thereby becomes unintelligible and impossible of
execution.
Cloward-Piven!
WE ARE DESPOTS
21. It is only with a despotic ruler that plans can be
elaborated extensively and clearly in such a way as to distribute the whole
properly among the several parts of the machinery of the State: from this the
conclusion is inevitable that a satisfactory form of government for any country
is one that concentrates in the hands of one responsible person. Without an
absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization which is carried
on not by the masses but by their guide, whosoever that person may be. The mob
is savage, and displays its savagery at every opportunity. The moment the mob
seizes freedom in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy, which in itself is the
highest degree of savagery.
Tyranny,
dictatorship, absolute power, this is how they plan to rule the world. They
bait the world into accepting it with the false promise of ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity’ This was the Freemasonic catch
phrase for the French Revolution!
22. Behold the alcoholic animals, bemused with drink, the
right to an immoderate use of which comes along with freedom. It is not for us
and ours to walk that road. The peoples of the GOYIM are bemused with alcoholic
liquors; their youth has grown stupid on classicism and from early immorality, into
which it has been inducted by our special agents - by tutors, lackeys,
governesses in the houses of the wealthy, by clerks and others, by our women in
the places of dissipation frequented by the GOYIM. In the number of these last
I count also the so-called "society ladies," voluntary followers of
the others in corruption and luxury.
They will infiltrate
and corrupt the nations.
23. Our countersign is - Force and Make-believe. Only force conquers in political affairs, especially if
it be concealed in the talents essential to statesmen. Violence must be the
principle, and cunning and make-believe
the rule for governments which do not want to lay down their crowns at the feet
of agents of some new power. This evil is the one and only means to attain the
end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when
they should serve towards the attainment of our end. In politics one must know
how to seize the property of others without hesitation if by it we secure submission
and sovereignty.
Force and
Make-believe, might and deception is their M O, the end justifies the means.
24. Our State, marching along the path of peaceful conquest,
has the right to replace the horrors of war by less noticeable and more
satisfactory sentences of death, necessary to maintain the terror which tends to produce blind submission. Just but merciless severity is the greatest
factor of strength in the State: not only for the sake of gain but also in the
name of duty, for the sake of victory, we must keep to the programme of
violence and make-believe. The
doctrine of squaring accounts is
precisely as strong as the means of which it makes use. Therefore it is not so
much by the means themselves as by the doctrine
of severity that we shall triumph and bring all governments into subjection
to our super-government. It is enough for them to know that we are too
merciless for all disobedience to cease.
Terror is one of
their tools, i. e., terrorism! The modern State of Israel was born of
terrorism, e. g., Irgun and the King David Hotel! So, who came up with the ‘war on terror’? There
will be no mercy, submit or die!
WE SHALL END LIBERTY
25. Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among
the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,"
words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll-parrots who, from all
sides around, flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the
well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded
against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the GOYIM, the
intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their
abstractedness; did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be
freedom: that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of
characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established
subordination to her laws: never stopped to think that the mob is a blind
thing, that upstarts elected from among it to bear rule are, in regard to the
political, the same blind men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a
fool, can yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius,
understands nothing in the political - to all those things the GOYIM paid no
regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule
rested: the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political
affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and
none could betray it to the governed. As time went on, the meaning of the
dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the political was
lost, and this aided the success of our cause.
They planned to
destroy the Christian West by destroying the Church. Their plan was exposed by
the Freemasonic ‘Alta Vendita’. Don’t be confused because Judaism is Masonry and
Masonry is Judaism (‘The Jewish Chronicle’ Dec 20, 1867)! The king was the
Defender of the Faith so they plotted the overthrow of all kings. The French
revolution was by their hands, this was written in circa 1900. At this very
time they were plotting the overthrow of Tsarists Russia. Look at the leaders
of the communist’s revolution, Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, all Jewish
Zionists. "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," was the bait, the
Make-Believe they used to get the mob to revolt!
26. In all corners of the earth the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,"
brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our
banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work
boring into the well-being of the GOYIM, putting an end everywhere to peace,
quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the GOY States. As you
will see later, this helped us to our triumph: it gave us the possibility,
among other things, of getting into our hands the master card - the destruction
of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy
of the GOYIM, that class which was the only defense peoples and countries had
against us. On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the
GOYIM we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the
aristocracy of money. The qualifications for this aristocracy we have
established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which
our learned elders provide the motive force.
The 'blind agents'
are the revolutionaries that took the 'bait' of liberalism, i. e.
"Liberty, Equality, Fraternity". These are the useful idiots and
their reward will be the guillotine when the King of Israel is installed as
ruler of the world. There will be no revolutionaries allowed in the new world
order.
27. Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in
our relations with the men, whom we wanted, we have always worked upon the most
sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash account, upon the cupidity,
upon the insatiability for material needs
of man; and each one of these human weaknesses, taken alone, is sufficient to
paralyze initiative, for it hands over the will of men to the disposition of
him who has bought their activities
Bribes, extortion,
honey pots, secret society initiation rituals and extreme oaths are some of
their tools!
28. The abstraction of freedom has enabled us to persuade
the mob in all countries that their government is nothing but the steward of
the people who are the owners of the country, and that the steward may be
replaced like a worn-out glove.
Look at how the office
of president of the United States of America has been scandalized and ridiculed
over the decades. Nixon the crook, Carter the buffoon, Clinton the immoral
criminal, Obama the illegitimate, homosexual Nigerian Muslim illegal alien, Trump;
trash mouth womanizer, hated by all but his supporters, and OBiden; the senile
communist, slave to China, child sniffer, rapists, etc..
The further away from
the teachings of Jesus the nations strayed, or were led, the easier it was to
deceive and ensnare them. Freedom is pretty well understood in the framework of
Christianity but the less influence the Bible has on the nation, the easier it
is to confuse the people with dubious claims of freedom. Take the concept of
justice, it's simply seeking that which is right. Justice is all encompassing,
there is no social justice, no racial justice, no economic justice, etc., there is just justice. They misused these
concepts to cause divisions within the nations, women’s rights, minority
rights, animal rights, environmental rights, and on and on. The last Church the
Apostle John wrote to in the Book of Revelation was Laodicea which could be
translated rights of the people. Many believe the letters were written in chronological
sequence as ages of the Church. If so, this would certainly fit with the age of
people's rights.
29. It is this possibility of replacing the representatives
of the people which has placed at our disposal, and, as it were, given us the
power of appointment.
Monday, June 14, 2021
The planned 'One World Government' aka 'New World Order' aka 'Great Reset' is here!
Sunday, June 13, 2021
Update: Police continue to hunt down Pastor while threatening his church...
Friday, June 11, 2021
President Trump Converts to Judaism?
President Trump Converts to Orthodox Judaism | by Moshe Schulman | Medium
Trump’s decision comes after days of consulting with his D.C. area rabbi — Rabbi Gary Busey.
President Trump announced that he will follow in his beautiful daughter’s footsteps and convert to Orthodox Judaism. This is an unprecedented move for a President, but he is convinced this will help ease any harsh and negative feelings toward him since the Charlottesville attack and his plethora of blunders when it comes to race relations and anti-Semitism. Timed perfectly for Hanukkah and the holiday season, Trump’s decision comes after days of consulting with his D.C. area rabbi — Rabbi Gary Busey.
President Trump is committed to only eating kosher food even though it means giving up his late-night fast food treats like McDonald’s and taco bowl from the Trump Grill. But he is very much looking forward to gefilte fish and traditional potato stew, chulent. It is unclear whether Melania and Baron will convert as well, but President Trump is encouraging them to join him. Even if that means Melania will have to wear long skirts and wigs.
“I love the Jewish people,” Trump said in a statement. “Last year I enjoyed a great Hanukah with the latkes and the dreidels at my amazing Mar-a-Lago, and I figured why not wear a yarmulke and just convert. I intend on making religion great again, too. Believe me.”
Trump plans on rewriting the Ten Commandments citing that they are ancient rules and they need to be upgraded to fit the world he lives in. Regarding the Sabbath, he usually rests anyway on Saturday so adjusting his lifestyle won’t be an issue. Trump doesn’t plan on wearing a yarmulke. He believes the way he conducts himself daily is God fearing enough; however, he will wear a yarmulke when in a synagogue as is the custom. “I have respect for traditions and customs for all people,” Trump said. “Except for the illegals.” Trump also plans on rebuilding the Western Wall, coating it in signature Trump gold, and renaming it the Trump Wall. No notes will be allowed in its crevices. Too messy.
To commemorate this historic conversion, Trump, his family, and some cabinet members will visit the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. to honor the Jewish people that came before him and to criticize how he could have made a better museum. Hope Hicks will be asked to stay behind. Too goyish.
President Trump wants to make a few things clear regarding his conversion:
1) this doesn’t mean he will disavow David Duke.
2) he will still support Steve Bannon and Breitbart.
3) He will definitely not be getting a bris at the age of 71.
To expand his Jewish knowledge, Trump plans to immediately watch Fiddler on the Roof. “I’ve heard great great things,” he said. He will also watch a marathon of Curb Your Enthusiasm, even if it means missing a few daily intelligence briefings. Trump’s transition team has reached out to Hulu and HBO to set up a presidential account. He has also requested his staff to fill the White House with Roman Vishniac photographs.
Going forward Trump will use the following hashtags to remind you of his conversion:
#makereligiongreatagain
#IlovetheJewishpeople
#Icanalsosplitasea
For all press related questions, please contact Rabbi Gary Busey.
Monday, June 7, 2021
Under Duress: Are Coerced COVID-19 Vaccinations Proportionate? - 21st Century Wire
Chris Lonsdale
21st Century Wire
To begin this article, in order to lay to rest the inevitable criticism that I am “telling people not to get vaccinated”, I want to state unequivocally my view that any person who wishes to take any vaccine should do so. Ideally, such a decision would be on the basis of fully informed consent and should never happen as a result of any form of coercion.
Why do I mention coercion? If you have never looked into the details of the Nuremberg code, now would be a good time. The essence of this code, developed due to dangerous medical experiments carried out on an unsuspecting public during the second world war, states very clearly that voluntary informed consent is required for any person taking part in a medical experiment. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his or her own body.
Moreover, any person deciding to take part in a medical experiment should have the legal capacity to give consent, and there should be no element of fraud, force, deceit, coercion or duress. The text of the Nuremberg Code can be found here:
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2011/04/BMJ_No_7070_Volume_313_The_Nuremberg_Code.pdf
So, a FUNDAMENTAL principle in the Nuremberg Code is that, whether or not a person takes any medication, vaccines included, should be a matter of individual informed choice. Nowhere should coercion be part of the process. Yet everywhere we look today we see coercion, force, propaganda, bribery and very slick and well-funded “persuasion” intended to get people jabbed with a COVID-19 “vaccine”.
Early May 2021, the state of Ohio started running a lottery to award five $1 million prizes to each of 5 lucky vaccinated people.
New York Mayor Bill de Blasio recently did a news conference promoting new fast food vouchers for a Shake Shack burgers and fries for residents who get their COVID-19 shots.
In Hong Kong we now have lotteries for property in order to “encourage” people to get the jab!
In the UK, a contract worth GBP320 million was awarded to the OMD GROUP LIMITED for “media buying service” – to do advertising around COVID19, and presumably to “encourage” people to get COVID vaccinations. Go to https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/search/ and search for “COVID 19 media buying.”
The information barrage is clearly having an effect. However, according to authorities around the world, the massively funded PR (read propaganda) campaigns seem not to be doing the job that is required. So, we’re seeing more and more examples of outright coercion, intended to force people to get injected with the COVID-19 “vaccines”.
I have been observing various people from both Hong Kong and elsewhere struggling as to whether or not they should proceed to get the COVID-19 jab. They are struggling because they believe that if they don’t get the jab, their freedom of movement or even their ability to hold down a job, will be significantly impaired. One neighbour informed me that he realises the COVID-19 vaccines have only been approved for emergency use and have not been fully tested for safety. However, he wants to travel to another country in Asia to see his wife but can’t do so unless he has proof of vaccination. Clearly under duress, he has taken the jab even though he feels there are significant risks. I saw him today. He looks ten years older, his face grey and drawn. He’s angry, and clearly feels violated.
Others (including in Hong Kong) have told me that they are under pressure from their employers to get the jab and are in fear of losing their job if they fail to do so.
While these personal observations may be anecdotal, they do illustrate an important point: instances of coercion and duress are very real, and perhaps more significant than mainstream media coverage is indicating.
In New Zealand at the end of April 2021, the government announced that in order to work, people dealing with incoming flights to the country had to have the jab. And, if they came to work without the jab they would then be liable to a $4000 fine and/or jail time. Note the following legislative text:
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2021/0094/latest/LMS487911.html
In Canada, regulations are being passed allowing children to be stuck with the jab without requiring parental consent, even though young people are at near ZERO risk of ever getting ill from, let alone dying of COVID-19.
Other government bodies are moving forward with mandatory vaccinations. Authorities in Buri Ram Province in Thailand recently issued an order requiring everyone to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or risk being jailed for up to two years or fined. People who refuse to be vaccinated may be liable to a maximum two years in prison and/or a fine up to 40,000 baht for breaching Thailand’s emergency decree around COVID-19.
Some governments maintain the official line that a Covid vaccination is not mandatory, but they are obviously working with industry groups to facilitate certain companies and organisations to compel vaccination using threats of withdrawal of services as a lever.
For example, in the US, Anthony Fauci, the chief medical advisor to President Joe Biden, said he expects businesses like airlines and cruise ships to require customers to show proof of getting a COVID-19 vaccine before coming on-board. Vis-à-vis universities he stated: “[i]f you want to come into campus and be in in-person learning, you’re going to have to show proof of vaccination.” Ergo, if you’re not vaccinated for COVID-19 you basically can’t travel or go to school.
In the UK, on May 19 Sean O’Grady wrote in The Independent that people who have not had the COVID-19 injection should be punished. As he said: “No jab, no job; no jab, no access to NHS healthcare; no jab, no state education for your kids. No jab, no access to pubs, restaurants, theatres, cinemas, stadiums. No jab, no entry to the UK, and much else.”
In Hong Kong the government “has offered the incentive of further relaxing social-distancing rules if staff and customers of restaurants and other venues are vaccinated,” as reported recently.
To be clear, every single one of the above examples violates the Nuremberg principles, wherein there should be no element of fraud, force, deceit, coercion or duress.
A question that we should ask is a simple one: for a product that is supposed to have so much benefit and (we are told) so little downside, why would cash lotteries, free hamburgers, incentives of varying kinds, massive ad campaigns, and non-stop cajoling be required? Why are threats to limit freedom of movement, use of services, and even the opportunity to make a living, being made in order to (literally) force people to get the COVID-19 injection? Wouldn’t people just go and get jabbed because they know it’s good for them?
As Dr. Peter McCollough recently said, “why (do stakeholders) want a needle in every arm? Why”?
Dr. McCollugh is a Texas based doctor who successfully treated COVID-19 patients and was the lead author in a study published in the American Journal of Medicine that summarized existing drugs already approved and in the market that had success in treating COVID-19 patients. His paper is published here:
https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext
Under normal circumstances many would agree that actions to coerce a medical intervention onto an individual, and more incredibly – onto an entire population, are nothing short of blackmail. And, as we know, people really don’t like to be blackmailed. Perhaps this explains the fact that, despite all the pressure, only 10 per cent of Hong Kong’s population have volunteered to receive the first jab.
It may also explain the fact that around 40%-50% of employees at the US NIH (National Institute of Health – Dr. Anthony Fauci’s organization) have also not been vaccinated against COVID-19, even though they were given priority.
Of course, all these people exercising their right NOT to be vaccinated is pejoratively labelled by many in the media as “vaccine hesitancy”. We are told that such hesitancy is childish and does not reflect the supposed reality that vaccines are “safe and effective”. In a recent SCMP editorial, the mantra that “vaccines are safe and effective” is repeated, and we are told that “inoculations bring about immunity without causing illness, prevent the spread of the disease.”
This, however, ignores the fact that the makers of the various COVID-19 vaccines have stated on the record that these vaccines are not guaranteed to prevent you getting a COVID-19 infection (i.e. they do NOT necessarily inoculate you).
As the Pfizer COVID-19 FACT SHEET FOR RECIPIENTS AND CAREGIVERS states, “the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is a vaccine (sic) and may prevent you from getting COVID-19. There is no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19” and “The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine may not protect everyone.” See labeling text here:
http://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14472
Of importance is the fact that we already see many reports of people diagnosed with COVID-19 after receiving these very same vaccinations!
Whether or not these injections prevent you infecting others is also a very open question, especially if the criterion for “infection” is a positive PCR Test. See my recent article in China Daily that goes into this problem in detail: https://www.chinadailyhk.com/article/168617#The-COVID-19-gaslighting-express
As to the belief that the current crop of vaccines is safe, one must be aware of three facts. Firstly reports of injury submitted to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) in the US following COVID-19 vaccines over only 4 months, are higher than all reported vaccine injuries from all vaccines over the past 15 years. As of May 26, 2021, based on a single search I personally made in the VAERS database, deaths recorded in that system following COVID-19 jabs stood at 3,528, with many tens of thousands of reported injuries. You can check this data for yourself online by visiting:
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html
In Europe, the Eudravigilance website that was launched by the European Medicines Agency in 2012 provides public access to reports of suspected side effects (also known as suspected adverse drug reactions). Their report through May 8, 2021 lists 10,570 deaths and 405,259 injuries following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots.
According to The Standard, in a recent report Hong Kong already appears to have had 12 deaths occurring post-vaccination for COVID-19.
Given the presence of all this information ANY blanket statement about vaccine safety needs to be considered very carefully in the context of real-world data related to the actual impacts of COVID-19 injections. And, importantly, as a person makes a decision about whether or not to get jabbed that person needs to estimate relative risk from COVID-19 vs the risks associated with getting the injections.
Secondly, most people are probably unaware that the COVID-19 injections are currently only in the middle of Phase III trials, which are scheduled to end in 2023. AND, the injections now available have only been given provisional approval. In the US, all the vaccines have EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) only. In the UK, COVID-19 these injections have only been given conditional approval. This is indicated on official documents from the vaccine manufacturers.
For instance, Pfizer’s own documentation states: “This EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine will end when the Secretary of HHS determines that the circumstances justifying the EUA no longer exist or when there is a change in the approval status of the product such that an EUA is no longer needed.” (i.e. when the FDA actually determines they are both safe and effective).
Of interest is the fact that the vaccines being produced by Johnson & Johnson in the US are coming out with no information on the vaccine inserts i.e. the consumer information normally found inside the vaccine packaging communicating about dosages, side effects, etc. The vaccine inserts are physically in the box, but they are blank. So, any persons injecting themselves with the current crop of emergency use vaccines are in fact volunteering to participate as a subject in a medical trial.
Nature magazine stated as much during the initial UK roll-out in December 2020, admitting that, “The vaccine has completed only a few months of the two-year clinical-trial period that it will need to complete before it is approved to be sold freely on the market. As a result, health officials, clinicians and people receiving the vaccine will be watching closely for as-yet unobserved signs of danger.”
Also of importance is the fact, probably unknown to most people, that the vaccine companies have been granted immunity from all legal challenges due to injury or death from their vaccines.
Why would that be? Makes one wonder, does it not? Perhaps the question we should be asking is cui bono? – Latin for “who benefits”?
Given the above information, the only basis upon which an intelligent and informed person would accept being injected with any new and not fully tested medical intervention would be if there was a deadly disease sweeping the world for which there is no cure and to which everybody is vulnerable.
Based on the massive amounts of epidemiological evidence gathered over the last 12 months it is clear that this is definitely not the case.
As early as mid-2020 the CDC indicated that COVID-19 has a survival rate of somewhere between 99.6% and 99.8%.
Also, the average age of death due to COVID-19 (based on UK data) is roughly 82 years old, which just happens to be one year longer than the common lifespan age of about 81. Hence, based on the official figures, COVID-19 will not affect most people, so one cannot claim that the entire population is at risk. Children and young adults statistically have zero risk, and even older people who have met with other corona viruses will in most cases have cross-immunity which protects them from COVID-19. The belief that COVID-19 will “get us all” is not supported by the science or the data. See my China Daily article: https://www.chinadailyhk.com/article/168617#The-COVID-19-gaslighting-express
It is notable that as of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 was no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK, based partly on the fact that mortality rates were clearly low overall. See government guidance here:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid
Thirdly, the belief that there is ‘no cure for COVID’ is also wildly out of place. There are a number of well known medications which have demonstrated successful results in treating those with this severe respiratory illness. For instance, Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with Zinc, used early in a COVID-19 infection, has been very successful in significantly reducing hospitalization and death. So has Ivermectin. “Fact checkers” will tell you that such information isn’t authorised by major institutions like the FDA, CDC, or WHO. They will also try to discount any positive results using ad hominem attacks and smears, such as pointing out that a person may have at some time in the past, voiced “anti-vaccine sentiments” (whatever that may be). You can see an example here: https://factcheck.afp.com/ivermectin-and-hydroxychloroquine-are-not-proven-covid-19-treatments
A study which came out in The Lancet mid-2020 supposedly showing that HCQ was dangerous was subsequently withdrawn due to it being fraudulent. Sadly, this withdrawal happened only after the damage was done, and HCQ had been successfully kicked to the curb in many places around the world – up to the point that in some jurisdictions doctors could be jailed for prescribing it.
Despite all this, we must remember that science is not about following instructions from bureaucrats or from on-high, but rather doing empirical work and looking at the results. And, mobbing people who present a view that is different to what is politically correct is also not science. What matters is the data and, of course, how that data is interpreted.
As of this writing, 248 trials of HCQ used for treating COVID-19 have been completed, by 3,972 scientists, with 378,812 patients. We can see 66% improvement in 26 early treatment trials, 75% improvement in 11 early treatment mortality results, and 24% improvement in 35 randomised controlled trials. These results are publicly available on a database that is tracking all HCQ studies to date. You can see those studies here: https://c19hcq.com
We must also realise that HCQ, along with Ivermectin (discussed below), are both included in the WHO list of essential medicines! Of course “fact checkers” will give stern warnings about the fact that for COVID-19 the use of HCQ or Ivermectin is “off label”, meaning that they were previously used for treating other diseases and suggesting that therefore they can’t be used to treat COVID-19. What they fail to mention is that doctors use all sorts of medicine “off label” all the time!
Since Ivermectin and HCQ are both on the WHO list of essential medicines and have been so for a long time – decades in the case of HCQ – the world knows about the safety and dosage of these medicines, which means that even if they don’t effectively treat COVID-19, there is no danger to patients from using these medicines. It’s better than following official guidelines which were, to all intents and purposes, “do nothing, stay home, and when you turn blue go to the hospital”.
The thing is, there really is overwhelming evidence that these treatments are effective against COVID-19.
Ivermectin has been demonstrated to be very effective at treating COVID-19. While the fact checkers would have you believing otherwise, Ivermectin has been used very successfully in many places around the world where media hysteria did not get it banned from the shelves. Just this week, reports coming out of India are demonstrating massive benefits from Ivermectin.
There is already a 97% decline in cases in New Delhi, India. 4 other Indian states that are using Ivermectin now report decreases in cases by 60% to 95%. However, other states that have blocked the use of Ivermectin have increases in cases by several hundred percent – the exponential explosion that everyone is terrified of!
As The Desert Review says in their report, “It is a clear refutation of the WHO, FDA, NIH, and CDC’s policies of “wait at home until you turn blue” before you get treatment.”
Before you buy into the line from “Fact Checkers” that these are only “observational studies” and haven’t been tested by large scale, randomised control trials approved by the WHO, CDC, NIH, FDA etc. you should know that 56 studies on Ivermectin, 17 of them being Randomised Controlled Trials, have clearly demonstrated very positive effects from Ivermectin. A site doing real-time meta-analysis of all the Ivermectin studies as they get published summarises the results as follows: “100% of the 17 Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) for early treatment and prophylaxis report positive effects, with an estimated improvement of 73% and 83% respectively”.
They also make the point that “The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 56 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 2 trillion (p = 0.00000000000041).” You can check this information yourself directly on their site https://ivmmeta.com
These treatments (and others) have, of course, been available since at least mid-2020, but you may not have even heard of them until right now. The reason is simple. Throughout 2020 and into 2021, anybody trying to share this information (ESPECIALLY professionals working in the field) would find themselves banned on most social media. Mainstream Media would also not publish this information, but rather would engage in so-called “fact-checking” and smears against the people bringing this information to the world. That in itself is a major red flag! We need to ask, why would information that could save (and is saving) tens of thousands of lives around the world be blocked?
In summary, and very importantly, we must understand that COVID-19 is not anything like a “black death,” which could strike any one of us down at any moment. It is not everywhere, killing anyone it touches. And the above evidence shows us it is not true that there is a complete lack of any form of effective treatment. This fact alone undermines the very basis of Emergency Use Authorization for all the COVID-19 vaccines.
Therefore, all talk of coercion or making COVID-19 vaccination mandatory should be stopped now before it’s too late. Because, when the lawsuits come – and they will come (they have started in Germany, the UK, Canada and other places) – the people on the stand for Nuremberg code violations will be company bosses, doctors, editors and government officials who pushed unsafe and unnecessary medical interventions onto a good-hearted, supportive, yet not-fully-informed public. Remember, the vaccine manufacturers have already negotiated legal immunity. Let that sink in.
***
Author Chris Lonsdale is a psychologist, linguist, educator, entrepreneur, dialogue facilitator and corporate advisor with over thirty years experience doing business in Asia. He is the creator of the Kungfu English mobile self-learning system, author of “The Third Ear” and “How to Learn Any Language in 6 Months” (in Chinese), and his TEDx talk on Language Learning is one of the top 10 TEDx videos of all time.
READ MORE VACCINE NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Vaccine Files
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT OUR INDEPENDENT MEDIA PLATFORM HERE